Whether the inter vivos gifts of the stock valid in this case. Case summary: Person D, their two brothers and family manage and operate the whole stock of businesses which is owned by D. Person D has three children among whom R is looking after the business which is owned by the family. By seeing R’s involvement in the business activities, D transferred certain properties and stocks to R’s name which are around half of the whole stock. But the certificates of R were put safely in the office along with other stock certificates and documents of the business. When D died, the estate was equally divided between the three children and it ignored the reference for previous gifts which were given by D to R at the time the estate was distributed. The other two children (DA and B) brought an action to contest the validity of the stock transfers.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 47, Problem 25CP

Summary Introduction

To determine: Whether the inter vivos gifts of the stock valid in this case.

Case summary: Person D, their two brothers and family manage and operate the whole stock of businesses which is owned by D. Person D has three children among whom R is looking after the business which is owned by the family. By seeing R’s involvement in the business activities, D transferred certain properties and stocks to R’s name which are around half of the whole stock. But the certificates of R were put safely in the office along with other stock certificates and documents of the business. When D died, the estate was equally divided between the three children and it ignored the reference for previous gifts which were given by D to R at the time the estate was distributed. The other two children (DA and B) brought an action to contest the validity of the stock transfers.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Prior to her death in 2023, Elfrieda made lifetime taxable gifts of $34,000. At her death, she was survived by her husband and daughter and owned the following property interests. Sole ownership: Life insurance on her husband's life with a death benefit of $500,000 and a replacement cost of $120,000, with her children as the beneficiaries A portfolio of stocks, bonds, and CDs valued at $8,000,000 Personal residence with a fair market value of $500,000 Joint ownership: With her husband: household furnishings, personal property, bank accounts, and automobiles worth a total of $800,000 With her daughter: a vacation condo valued at $400,000 for which her executor has records showing a 20% contribution by her daughter Her will bequeaths the personal residence outright to her husband with the rest and remainder of her estate to her daughter. She had debts of $6,000 and administrative costs of $24,000. Which one of these amounts, if any, most closely approximates Elfrieda's estate tax…

Leonard Wolfe was killed in an automobile accident while driving his Toyota Camry. The car was rendered a total loss, and Wolfe’s insurance carrier paid his estate $18,550 for damage to the vehicle. Under the terms of Wolfe’s will, any car owned at his death was to be given to his brother, David. Wolfe’s daughter, Carol, however, brought an action, claiming that the gift of the car to David was adeemed by its total destruction and that she, as the residuary legatee under the will, was entitled to the insurance proceeds. Who is entitled to the insurance proceeds?

Jean died in a common-law state in 2023 and was survived by her husband, Loren, and three adult children. Jean's gross estate, all of which was owned solely in her name, was composed of the following assets and date of death fair market values: Assets Values Common stock $ 4,900,000 Residence 750,000 Personal property 60,000 IRAs 3,450,000 Hummel figurines 175,000 Total Assets $ 9,335,000 Jean's only liabilities, together with their date of death balance, were as follows: Liabilities Balance Mortgage on residence $175,000 Car loan 8,000 Total $183,000 The following is a list of all of the gratuitous transfers that Jean made during her lifetime: 2000: Placed the common stock listed above in an irrevocable trust in which she retained the right to a 5% distribution of the trust account revalued annually for 25 years with the remainder to her children at her death; the date of gift fair market value of the stock was $190,000; the value of Jean's…