Concept explainers
To explain: The possibility for the existence of antiatoms in some part of the universe, their detection, and the problems might arise if we actually did go there.
Answer to Problem 44.1DQ
There is possibility for the existence of antiatoms in the universe and their detection is not possible since their spectra will be the same as that of corresponding matter and the matter antimatter annihilation will result the destruction of our body if we actually go to a region of antimatter.
Explanation of Solution
The antiparticles bind with one another to form antimatter as exactly same as the ordinary particle bind to form the matter. If a positron and an antiproton bind together, the result will be an antihydrogen which can be considered the smallest antiatom. The physical principles indicate that in the universe, complex antimatter atomic nuclei composed of antiprotons and antineutrons are possible, as well as when they surrounded by positrons, the existence of antiatoms corresponding to the known chemical elements is also possible.
A specific method for the detection of the antimatter is not known since, if the neutral antiatoms do exist, their behavior will be exactly same as the normal atoms. So any spectra of an atom that given by the light that emit which composed of photons will be the same as the spectra that given by the antiatom, which composed of antiphotons. This is only because photon is its own antiparticle. So we cannot detect the antiatoms by identifying the light they emit as composed of antiphotons. The only way to identify the presence of antimatter is through their annihilation with matter. If we actually did go to the antimatter region the problem that might occur is that the annihilation of matter in our body with the antimatter in that region and thereby the complete destruction of our body.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is possibility for the existence of antiatoms in the universe and their detection is not possible since their spectra will be the same as that of corresponding matter and the matter antimatter annihilation will result the destruction of our body if we actually go to a region of antimatter.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 44 Solutions
University Physics with Modern Physics (14th Edition)
- No chatgpt pls will upvotearrow_forward8.114 CALC A Variable-Mass Raindrop. In a rocket-propul- sion problem the mass is variable. Another such problem is a rain- drop falling through a cloud of small water droplets. Some of these small droplets adhere to the raindrop, thereby increasing its mass as it falls. The force on the raindrop is dp dv dm Fext = + dt dt dt = Suppose the mass of the raindrop depends on the distance x that it has fallen. Then m kx, where k is a constant, and dm/dt = kv. This gives, since Fext = mg, dv mg = m + v(kv) dt Or, dividing by k, dv xgx + v² dt This is a differential equation that has a solution of the form v = at, where a is the acceleration and is constant. Take the initial velocity of the raindrop to be zero. (a) Using the proposed solution for v, find the acceleration a. (b) Find the distance the raindrop has fallen in t = 3.00 s. (c) Given that k = 2.00 g/m, find the mass of the raindrop at t = 3.00 s. (For many more intriguing aspects of this problem, see K. S. Krane, American Journal of…arrow_forward8.13 A 2.00-kg stone is sliding Figure E8.13 F (kN) to the right on a frictionless hori- zontal surface at 5.00 m/s when it is suddenly struck by an object that exerts a large horizontal force on it for a short period of 2.50 time. The graph in Fig. E8.13 shows the magnitude of this force as a function of time. (a) What impulse does this force exert on t (ms) 15.0 16.0 the stone? (b) Just after the force stops acting, find the magnitude and direction of the stone's velocity if the force acts (i) to the right or (ii) to the left.arrow_forward
- Please calculate the expectation value for E and the uncertainty in E for this wavefunction trapped in a simple harmonic oscillator potentialarrow_forwardIf an object that has a mass of 2m and moves with velocity v to the right collides with another mass of 1m that is moving with velocity v to the left, in which direction will the combined inelastic collision move?arrow_forwardPlease solve this questionarrow_forward
- Please solvearrow_forwardQuestions 68-70 Four hundred millilitres (mL) of a strong brine solution at room temperature was poured into a measuring cylinder (Figure 1). A piece of ice of mass 100 g was then gently placed in the brine solution and allowed to float freely (Figure 2). Changes in the surface level of the liquid in the cylinder were then observed until all the ice had melted. Assume that the densities of water, ice and the brine solution are 1000 kg m-3, 900 kg m3 and 1100 kg m3, respectively. 68 Figure 1 400 400 Figure 2 1m² = 1x10 mL After the ice was placed in the brine solution and before any of it had melted, the level of the brine solution was closest to 485 mL. B 490 mL. C 495 mL. Displaced volume by ice. D 500 mL. weight of ice 69 The level of the brine solution after all the ice had melted was A 490 mL B 495 mL D 1100kg/m² = 909 xious mis 70 Suppose water of the same volume and temperature had been used instead of the brine solution. In this case, by the time all the ice had melted, the…arrow_forwardPlease showarrow_forward
- Principles of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningModern PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781111794378Author:Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. MoyerPublisher:Cengage LearningCollege PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781938168000Author:Paul Peter Urone, Roger HinrichsPublisher:OpenStax College