Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Quality Audit
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305080577
Author: Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher: South-Western College Pub
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 6TFQ
To determine
Introduction: The independent examination of the financial statements of an entity is termed as an audit. In an audit engagement, the auditor provides an opinion on the true and fair view of the financial statements. An auditor can be held liable under common law, contract law, and statutory law.
To identify: Whether the given statement is true or false.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
What does a third-party user of financial statements have to prove under common law in a suit against an auditor for the auditor's negligence?
Auditors may be held liable to both their clients and third parties under common law.
a. What must a client prove to recover its losses from the auditors under common law?
b. In a court that adheres to the precedent set by the Ultramares v. Touche case, what must an ordinary third party prove to recover losses from the auditors under common law
What does a third-party user of financial statements have to prove under common law in a suit against an auditor for the auditor's negligence? Explain each item with an example
Chapter 4 Solutions
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Quality Audit
Ch. 4 - Prob. 1TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 2TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 3TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 4TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 5TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 6TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 7TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 8TFQCh. 4 - Utilitarian theory holds that what is ethical is...Ch. 4 - Prob. 10TFQ
Ch. 4 - Prob. 11TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 12TFQCh. 4 - Prob. 13MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 14MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 15MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 16MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 17MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 18MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 19MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 20MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 21MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 22MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 23MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 24MCQCh. 4 - Prob. 25RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 26RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 27RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 28RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 29RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 30RSCQCh. 4 - Refer to the Focus on Fraud feature “Moss Adams...Ch. 4 - Prob. 32RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 33RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 34RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 35RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 36RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 37RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 38RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 39RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 40RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 41RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 42RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 43RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 44RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 45RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 46RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 47RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 48RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 49RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 50RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 51RSCQCh. 4 - Refer to Exhibit 4.4. Briefly explain the seven...Ch. 4 - Prob. 53RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 54RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 55RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 56RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 57RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 58RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 59RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 60RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 61RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 62RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 63RSCQCh. 4 - Prob. 64RSCQCh. 4 - KPMG (LO 1, 2, 3) KPMG LLP served as the external...Ch. 4 - Prob. 66FF
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- What elements does a plaintiff have to prove to be successful in a case against a negligent auditor?arrow_forward2. A client has departed from GAAP for what you, the auditor, considers to be justifiable. The financial statements would have been misleading if the client had not departed from GAAP. Circumstance: Type of Opinion:arrow_forwardIn comparison to the burden of proof required of plaintiffs in civil lawsuits against independent auditors under common law, section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934a. Is the same regarding plaintiffs’ need to prove damages or losses.b. Is the same regarding plaintiffs’ need to establish privity or a beneficiary relationshipwith auditors.c. Does not require that plaintiffs prove their reliance on materially misstated financialstatements.d. Does not require that plaintiffs prove that relying on the materially misstated financialstatements caused their losses.arrow_forward
- The Commissioner can force a taxpayer to produce his/its accounting records if the taxpayer refuses to provide the same during audit. A. True B. Falsearrow_forwardWhy are auditors not liable for defamation in connection with his/her audit?arrow_forwardUnder common law, which of the following statements most accurately reflects the liability of a CPA who fraudulently gives an opinion on an audit of a client's financial statements? A. The CPA is liable only to third parties in privity of contract with the CPA B. The CPA is liable only to known users of the financial statements C. The CPA probably is liable to any person who suffered a loss as a result of the fraud D. The CPA probably is liable to the client even if the client was aware of the fraud and did not rely on the opinionarrow_forward
- In a common law action against an accountant, lack of privity is a viable defense ifthe plaintiff(1) is the client’s creditor who sues the accountant for negligence.(2) can prove the presence of gross negligence that amounts to a reckless disregardfor the truth.(3) is the accountant’s client.(4) bases the action upon fraud.arrow_forwardThe attorney's refusal to reply to the audit inquiry is a scope limitation that may affect the audit report. True Falsearrow_forwardAudit evidence obtained directly by the auditor will not be reliable if Select one: a. it is provided by the client's attorney b. the auditor lacks the competence to evaluate the evidence c. it is impossible for the auditor to obtain additional corroboratory evidence d. the client denies its veracityarrow_forward
- What is the auditor's role when a client fails to follow the law?arrow_forwardAuditor’s failure to exercise sufficient care and skill in carrying out their audit might lead to legal action by those who claim to rely on the work of the auditor (Che-Ahmad et. Al., 2018). Discuss THREE (3) safeguards by auditors that could help minimize the risk of legal liability.arrow_forwardThe following pertains to auditor legal liability standards under the PSLRA:a. The Reform Act requires that, in any private securities fraud action in which the plaintiff is alleging a misleading statement or omission on the part of the defendant, “the complaint shall specify each statement alleged to have been misleading, the reason or reasons why the statement is misleading, and, if an allegation regarding the statement or omission is made on information and belief, the complaint shall state with particularity all facts on which that belief is formed.”90Do you believe this standard better protects auditors from legal liability than the standards which existed before the PSLRA? Explain.b. Do you believe the change in standards for auditors’ liability under the PSLRA from joint-and-several to proportional liability was a good thing? Explain.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning