Fraud Case Case Summary: A, the newly minted CPA was auditing the Company P. He observed that the current ratio has gone down drastically from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2017. He detected that the sales returns for the substandard quality was being debited to an long-term asset called “grain reserves” in place of sales return and allowance to keep the income unaffected. To Discuss: How the fraudulent accounting treatment affect the current ratio.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 4.1CTFC

1.

To determine

Fraud Case

Case Summary: A, the newly minted CPA was auditing the Company P. He observed that the current ratio has gone down drastically from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2017. He detected that the sales returns for the substandard quality was being debited to an long-term asset called “grain reserves” in place of sales return and allowance to keep the income unaffected.

To Discuss: How the fraudulent accounting treatment affect the current ratio.

2.

To determine

To Identify: Any reason for someone in the company to take such kind of action.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

You are auditing the accounts receivable for Conor Company as of December 31, 2022 One of your procedures was to send positive confirmations to a sample of 50 accounts. Of those 50 confirmations, 40 have been positively confirmed without comments, 7 had minor differences that have been cleared satisfactorily. The remaining 3 had the following comments: “We received $6,000 of goods on consignment on November 20, 2022. We have not sold them yet.” “We received these goods on January 5, 2023 and mailed a check on January 7, 2023.” “The balance of $2,000 was paid on December 10, 2022.” For each of these comments, identify the steps that you would take to clear (resolve) them.

You are auditing the accounts receivable for Conor Company as of December 31, 2021. One of your procedures was to send positive confirmations to a sample of 50 accounts. Of those 50 confirmations, 40 have been positively confirmed without comments, 7 had minor differences that have been cleared satisfactorily. Two of the responses had the following comments: a. “We never received these goods.” b. “The balance of $1,000 was paid on December 15, 2021.” For each of these comments, identify the steps that you would take to clear (resolve) them.

Indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements and explain your reasoning. Teresa Dziuba was assigned to the Heathcliff Energy audit. She was ensuring that when recognizing revenues, all transactions and events that should have been recorded have been recorded. She was testing the existence assertion. Assume materiality for the financial statements as a whole is $200,000 and performance materiality for accounts receivable is set at $80,000. If the auditor finds one receivable that is overstated by $110,000, the auditor can ignore the error as it is less than $200,000 (overall materiality). Steve Slopak, the group partner was reviewing the work of Manny Fernandez on the Lake Shore Gold account. Manny asked Steve for an explanation on how audit risk_ould affect his work. Steve answered: “Audit risk affects the quantity and quality of evidence gathering."