Principles Of Auditing & Other Assurance Services
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781259916984
Author: WHITTINGTON, Ray, Pany, Kurt
Publisher: Mcgraw-hill Education,
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 36P
a.
To determine
Explain under the given assumption the plaintiffs’ allegations that must be proved in the court and the defence mechanism that auditors can exercise to avoid or reduce their liability.
b.
To determine
Explain under the given assumption the plaintiffs’ allegations that must be proved in the court and the defence mechanism that auditors can exercise to avoid or reduce their liability.
c.
To determine
Explain under the given assumption the plaintiffs’ allegations that must be proved in the court and the defence mechanism that auditors can exercise to avoid or reduce their liability.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Major, Major & Sharpe, CPAs, are the auditors of MacLain Technologies. In connectionwith the public offering of $10 million of MacLain securities, Major expressed anunqualified opinion as to the financial statements. Subsequent to the offering, certainmisstatements were revealed. Major has been sued by the purchasers of the stockoffered pursuant to the registration statement that included the financial statementsaudited by Major. In the ensuing lawsuit by the MacLain investors, Major will be ableto avoid liability if(1) the misstatements were caused primarily by MacLain.(2) it can be shown that at least some of the investors did not actually read theaudited financial statements.(3) it can prove due diligence in the audit of the financial statements of MacLain.(4) MacLain had expressly assumed any liability in connection with the public offering.
Nixon & Co., CPAs, issued an unmodified opinion on the 2015 financial statements of Madison Corp. These financial statements were included in Madison’s annual report and Form 10-K filed with the SEC. Nixon did not detect material misstatements in the financial statements as a result of negligence in the performance of the audit. Based upon the financial statements, Harry Corp. purchased stock in Madison. Shortly thereafter, Madison became insolvent, causing the price of the stock to decline drastically. Harry has commenced legal action against Nixon for damages based upon Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. What would be Nixon’s best defense to such an action? Explain.
Liability under the Securities Acts. Orange is a public entity whose shares are traded ona national exchange. A Public Company Accounting Oversight Board inspection revealed adeficiency in audits conducted by Orange’s auditor, LeGrow. LeGrow had failed to performimportant auditing procedures; after performing these procedures in response to the inspection, LeGrow identified several material misstatements and requested that Orange restateits financial statements. These restatements had the effect of reducing Orange’s reportedincome and cash flow from operations and increasing its liabilities.Upon the disclosure of these restatements, Orange’s stock price declined more than 40percent. Angered over this decline, investors are contemplating bringing legal action againstLeGrow for failing to detect the misstatements.Required:a. Assume that investors are bringing suit under the Securities Act of 1933. What wouldinvestors need to demonstrate to bring suit against LeGrow under this act?b. What…
Chapter 4 Solutions
Principles Of Auditing & Other Assurance Services
Ch. 4 - Prob. 1RQCh. 4 - Prob. 2RQCh. 4 - Prob. 3RQCh. 4 - Prob. 4RQCh. 4 - Prob. 5RQCh. 4 - Prob. 6RQCh. 4 - Prob. 7RQCh. 4 - Prob. 8RQCh. 4 - Prob. 9RQCh. 4 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 4 - Prob. 11RQCh. 4 - Prob. 12RQCh. 4 - Prob. 13RQCh. 4 - Prob. 14RQCh. 4 - Prob. 15RQCh. 4 - Prob. 16RQCh. 4 - Prob. 17RQCh. 4 - Prob. 18RQCh. 4 - Prob. 19RQCh. 4 - Prob. 20QRACh. 4 - Prob. 21QRACh. 4 - Prob. 22QRACh. 4 - Prob. 23QRACh. 4 - Prob. 24QRACh. 4 - Prob. 25QRACh. 4 - Prob. 26QRACh. 4 - Gordon Moore, CPAs, were the auditors of Fox ...Ch. 4 - Prob. 28AOQCh. 4 - Prob. 28BOQCh. 4 - Prob. 28COQCh. 4 - Prob. 28DOQCh. 4 - Prob. 28EOQCh. 4 - Prob. 28FOQCh. 4 - Prob. 28GOQCh. 4 - Prob. 28HOQCh. 4 - Prob. 28IOQCh. 4 - Prob. 28JOQCh. 4 - Prob. 28KOQCh. 4 - Prob. 28LOQCh. 4 - Prob. 29OQCh. 4 - Prob. 30OQCh. 4 - Match the important cases listed below with the...Ch. 4 - Prob. 32OQCh. 4 - For each definition (or portion of a definition)...Ch. 4 - Prob. 34PCh. 4 - Prob. 35PCh. 4 - Prob. 36PCh. 4 - Charles Worthington, the founding and senior...Ch. 4 - Prob. 38PCh. 4 - Prob. 39PCh. 4 - Prob. 40PCh. 4 - Prob. 41ITCCh. 4 - Prob. 42RDC
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- In comparison to the burden of proof required of plaintiffs in civil lawsuits against independent auditors under common law, section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934a. Is the same regarding plaintiffs’ need to prove damages or losses.b. Is the same regarding plaintiffs’ need to establish privity or a beneficiary relationshipwith auditors.c. Does not require that plaintiffs prove their reliance on materially misstated financialstatements.d. Does not require that plaintiffs prove that relying on the materially misstated financialstatements caused their losses.arrow_forwardA CPA issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of a company that sold common stock in a public offering subject to the Securities Act of 1933. Based on a misstatement in the financial statements, the CPA is being sued by an investor who purchased shares of this public offering. Which of the following represents a viable defense? A) The investor has not proven CPA negligence. B) The CPA detected the misstatement after the audit report date. C) The audit work was adequate to support the CPA's opinion. D) The investor did not rely upon the financial statement.arrow_forwardSawyer and Sawyer, CPAs, audited the financial statements of Rattler Corporation that were included in Rattler’s Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC. Subsequently, Rattler Corporation went bankrupt and the stockholders of the corporation brought a class-action lawsuit against management, Sawyer and Sawyer, and the corporation’s board of directors and attorneys for misstatements of the financial statements. Assume that the jury in the case decides that responsibility for $5 million in losses should be allocated as follows: Management 70% Board of directors 20 Auditors 5 Attorneys 5 100% Under what securities act would the stockholders initiate this lawsuit? Assuming that all the defendants in the case are financially able to pay their share of the losses, calculate the amount of losses that would be allocated to Sawyer and Sawyer. Assuming that management had no financial resources, describe how Sawyer and Sawyer’s share of the losses might be increased.arrow_forward
- The Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act of 2002 is federal legislation designed to protect publicly held companies from frivolous litigation. The Act makes it m pursue litigation based solely on commentary by company executives and decreased penalties for violation of existing securities laws. True or False True Falsearrow_forwardMark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. If Apex Construction also sues Williams for negligence, what are the probable legal defenses Williams’s attorney would raise?…arrow_forwardMark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. Will the negligence of Mark Williams, CPA, prevent him from recovering on a liability insurance policy covering the practice of…arrow_forward
- Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. What liability does Williams have to Jackson Financial? Explainarrow_forwardWhat was the significance of the controversy in 1977 over the appropriate accounting principles to be used by oil- and gas-producing companies?a. Several major lawsuits resulted.b. Companies refused to follow the SEC’s dictates.c. Partners of a major accounting firm were indicted on criminal charges.d. The SEC overruled the FASB on its handling of this matter.arrow_forwardEY did not modify the 2007 audit opinion of Lehman Brothers for going-concern uncertainty, yet the entity filed for bankruptcy less than a year later. In your opinion, is this indicative of an audit failure? Why?arrow_forward
- Which of the following statements regarding auditors’ liability under the Securities Act of1933 is not true?a. The act relates to the initial issuance of securities to the public, normally through an initial public offering.b. Auditors’ liability arises because of audited financial information filed with the SEC.c. Third parties must demonstrate that they relied on misstated financial statements thatwere examined by auditors.d. Auditors may be liable if they are found to have engaged in ordinary negligence.arrow_forwardUnknown to the other four proponents, Enrico (who had been given the task of attending to the Articles of Incorporation of the proposed corporation, Auto Mo,AyosKo) misappropriated the filing fees and never filed the Articles of Incorporation with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (SEC). Instead, he prepared and presented to the proposed incorporators a falsified SEC certificate approving the Articles. Relying on the falsified SEC certificate, the latter began assuming and discharging corporate powers. . Auto Mo, Ayos Ko is a __________. a. de jure corporation b. de facto corporation c. corporation by estoppel d. general partnershiparrow_forwardAn investor or creditor believes that they have suffered harm due to the unexpected the bankruptcy of a large corporation: Required: Can that investor or creditor sue the auditor of the large corporation under contract law? Explain. If the investor or creditor chooses to sue the auditor of the large corporation under tort law, what must they prove before their claim can succeed? How can the auditor contest a claim of negligence?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And AnalysisAccountingISBN:9781337788281Author:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald PagachPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And Analysis
Accounting
ISBN:9781337788281
Author:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald Pagach
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337485913
Author:BROOKS
Publisher:Cengage