(a)
To illustrate the given situation with supply and demand curves.
(a)
Explanation of Solution
Figure 1 illustrates the
The figure 1 shows the demand and supply curves for the oil painting, which was sold in auction for $450.3 million. The horizontal axis measures the quantity and the vertical axis measures the price of the commodity. The supply curve is a vertical line because the quantity of the artwork is fixed and unity.
Demand Curve: A demand curve is a graph which shows the quantities of a commodity that the consumers will buy at different price levels.
Supply Curve: A supply curve is a graph which shows the quantities of a commodity that the producers are willing to sell at different price levels.
(b)
Illustration of shift in supply curve.
(b)
Explanation of Solution
Figure 2 illustrates the change in market equilibrium.
The figure2 shows the demand and supply curves for the hogs. The horizontal axis measures the quantity and the vertical axis measures the price of the commodity. The increase in the supply of the hogs has led to a rightward shift of the supply curve and while the demand remains unchanged. As a result the equilibrium changes and the prices decrease from 81 cents to 70 cents and the quantity increases from Q0 to Q1.
(c)
Illustration of market equilibrium.
(c)
Explanation of Solution
Figure 3 illustrates the change in market equilibrium.
Figure 3
The figure3 shows the demand and supply curves for the organic produce. The horizontal axis measures the quantity and the vertical axis measures the price of the commodity. The initial increase in the demand for organic produce led to the shift of the demand curve from D0 to D1. However, the increase in the number of farmers producing the organic produce also increased leading to an increase in the supply of the product which shifts the supply curve from S0 to S1. The combined effect is that the price of organic produce reduces from P0 to P1 as the quantity supplied increases from Q0 to Q1.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 4 Solutions
Principles Of Microeconomics
- The preferences of a consumer are represented by the following utility function: U = min (×1, 2x2) If income is 100 and p1=p2=1 a) What is the optimal bundle? b) If p₁=4, what is the new optimal bundle? c) If p2=4, what is the new optimal bundle? d) Decompose the price effect into income and substitution effect and provide a graphical representation of your results.arrow_forwardChallenges of Nepal's foreign trade.arrow_forwardSolarrow_forward
- The answer is not Carrow_forwardSocial capital includes: a) labour, produced capital, and natural capital. b) human capital, physical capital, and natural resources. c) labour, physical capital, and human capital. d) labour, physical capital, and produced capital.arrow_forwardGeneral Accounting Question solution and give me Blank ? Carrow_forward
- It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives. Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.arrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardanswerarrow_forward
- Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forwardFor the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education