The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights. To explain : The cause as well as the clause of the US Constitution that had been violated in the given case.

Question

BUSINESS LAW 3 - David Ungar holds a Dunkin’ Donut's franchise. The terms of his franchise agreement require him to use only those ingredients furnished by Dunkin’ Donuts. He is also required to buy its napkins, cups, and so on, with the Dunkin’ Donut's trademark on them. Is this an illegal tying arrangement? What if Dunkin’ Donuts maintains that it needs these requirements to maintain its quality levels on a nationwide basis? [Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts of America, Inc., 429 U.S 5 - Hines Cosmetic Co. sold beauty preparations nationally to beauty shops at a standard or fixed- price schedule. Some of the shops were also supplied with a free demonstrator and free advertising materials. The shops that were not supplied with them claimed that giving the free services and materials constituted unlawful price discrimination. Hines replied that there was no price discrimination because it charged everyone the same. What it was giving free was merely a promotional campaign that was not…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 10BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To explain :The cause as well as the clause of the US Constitution that had been violated in the given case.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reason for how the rule of law had been breached.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reasoning behind the court’s conclusion that there was a violation of right.

(d)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The decision of the federal appellate court regarding the allegations as well as the court’s view for the post order stage.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

BUSINESS LAW 3 - David Ungar holds a Dunkin’ Donut's franchise. The terms of his franchise agreement require him to use only those ingredients furnished by Dunkin’ Donuts. He is also required to buy its napkins, cups, and so on, with the Dunkin’ Donut's trademark on them. Is this an illegal tying arrangement? What if Dunkin’ Donuts maintains that it needs these requirements to maintain its quality levels on a nationwide basis? [Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts of America, Inc., 429 U.S 5 - Hines Cosmetic Co. sold beauty preparations nationally to beauty shops at a standard or fixed- price schedule. Some of the shops were also supplied with a free demonstrator and free advertising materials. The shops that were not supplied with them claimed that giving the free services and materials constituted unlawful price discrimination. Hines replied that there was no price discrimination because it charged everyone the same. What it was giving free was merely a promotional campaign that was not…

An example of a legal object may be : a) an idea you have for a new business venture B) a 21-year old male person C) all natural and juristic persons D) all the above

Should U.S. courts, and in particular the United States Supreme Court look to the laws of other nations for guidance when deciding important issues, including those involving rights granted by the Constitution? If so, what impact might this have on their decisions? Please explain.

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 10BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To explain :The cause as well as the clause of the US Constitution that had been violated in the given case.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reason for how the rule of law had been breached.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reasoning behind the court’s conclusion that there was a violation of right.

(d)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The decision of the federal appellate court regarding the allegations as well as the court’s view for the post order stage.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 10BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To explain :The cause as well as the clause of the US Constitution that had been violated in the given case.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reason for how the rule of law had been breached.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reasoning behind the court’s conclusion that there was a violation of right.

(d)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The decision of the federal appellate court regarding the allegations as well as the court’s view for the post order stage.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 10BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To explain :The cause as well as the clause of the US Constitution that had been violated in the given case.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reason for how the rule of law had been breached.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reasoning behind the court’s conclusion that there was a violation of right.

(d)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The decision of the federal appellate court regarding the allegations as well as the court’s view for the post order stage.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 5

Chapter 4, Problem 10BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To explain :The cause as well as the clause of the US Constitution that had been violated in the given case.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reason for how the rule of law had been breached.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reasoning behind the court’s conclusion that there was a violation of right.

(d)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The decision of the federal appellate court regarding the allegations as well as the court’s view for the post order stage.

Answer 6

Chapter 4, Problem 10BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To explain :The cause as well as the clause of the US Constitution that had been violated in the given case.

Answer 7

Chapter 4, Problem 10BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To explain :The cause as well as the clause of the US Constitution that had been violated in the given case.

Answer 8

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reason for how the rule of law had been breached.

Answer 9

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reason for how the rule of law had been breached.

Answer 10

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reasoning behind the court’s conclusion that there was a violation of right.

Answer 11

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The reasoning behind the court’s conclusion that there was a violation of right.

Answer 12

(d)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The decision of the federal appellate court regarding the allegations as well as the court’s view for the post order stage.

Answer 13

(d)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person MT is a Muslim inmate incarcerated at WCI in Wisconsin. During the month of Ramadan, a core religious practice required him to undertake sunrise to sunset fast. This was accommodated by the prison through the provision of “meal bags” at sunset to each Muslim prisoner. The eligibility criteria were decided by the prison’s chaplain. On two specific days, the person MT was denied meal bags by guard L even though the person MT was on the list maintained, and was further informed by two other guards that his name had been removed by Captain H, which was false. If he wanted to consume food, he had to go to the cafeteria. He was later provided with meal bags till the end of Ramadan. The person MT sued the guards later for breaching his First Amendment rights.

To find:The decision of the federal appellate court regarding the allegations as well as the court’s view for the post order stage.

Answer 14

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 15

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 16

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 17

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 18

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 19

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Answer 20

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Answer 21

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Answer 22

Trending now

Answer 23

This is a popular solution!

Answer 24

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 25

Ch. 4 - Prob. 1RE Ch. 4 - Prob. 2RE Ch. 4 - Prob. 3RE Ch. 4 - Prob. 4RE Ch. 4 - Prob. 1IS Ch. 4 - Prob. 2IS Ch. 4 - Prob. 1BS Ch. 4 - Prob. 2BS Ch. 4 - Prob. 3BCP Ch. 4 - Prob. 4BCP

Solution Summary: The author explains the violation of the First Amendment of US Constitution, which allows freedom of following any religion and the religious practices associated with it.

Chapter 4 Solutions