The following ethical scenario was obtained from http://www.cwru.edu/wwwethics.
You are an engineer charged with performing safety testing and obtaining appropriate regulatory agency or outside testing laboratory approvals of your company’s product. The Gee Whiz Mark2 (GWM2) has been tested and found compliant with both voluntary and mandatory safety standards in North America and Europe. Because of a purchase-order error and subsequent oversights in manufacture. 25,000 units of GWM2 were built that are not compliant with any of the North American or European safety standards. A user would be more vulnerable to electric shock from one of these units than from a compliant unit. Under some plausible combinations of events, the user of the bad unit could be electrocuted. Retrofitting these products to make them compliant is not feasible because the rework costs would exceed the profit margin by far. The company agrees that because of this defect the agency safety labels will not be attached to the bad units, as per the requirements of the several agencies. Only two options exist: (a) Scrap the units and take the loss, or (b) sell the units. An employee of the company notes that many countries have no safety standards of any kind for this type of product. It is suggested that the bad units be marketed in these countries. It is pointed out that many of these nations have no electrical wiring code; or if codes exist, they are not enforced. The argument is thus advanced that the bad GWM2 units are no worse than the modus operandi of the electrical practice of these countries and their cultural values. Assume that no treaties or export regulations would be violated.
- a. What would be your recommendation?
- b. Suppose one of the countries under consideration was the country of origin for you or your recent ancestors. Would this affect your recommendations?
- c. Now suppose you are not asked for a recommendation, only an opinion. What is your response?
- d. Suppose it is suggested that the bad units be sold to a third party, who would very likely sell the units to these countries. Your comments?
- e. You are offered gratis one of the bad units for your use at home, provided that you sign a release indicating your awareness of the condition of the unit and that it is given to you as a test unit. Assume you cannot retrofit it and that the product could be very useful to you. Would you accept the offer?
- f. Suppose it is suggested that the offer stated in part (e) be made to all employees of the company. Your comments?
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 3 Solutions
ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS
- A hotel chain based in the United States contracts with a European vacuum cleaner manufacturer to supply a large number of upright cleaner units. After delivery, the hotel raises questions about manufacturer vacuum cleaner performance claims, pointing out that the units should have been tested to meet ASTM 558, an American standard. The manufacturer notes the advertised performance is based on IEC 60312, a European standard, and the two test codes will yield similar, if not exact, results. Investigate both test codes and address similarities and differences. Is there a legitimate claim here?arrow_forwardQuestion 2 You are a biomedical engineer working for a small orthopaedic firm that fabricates rectangular shaped fracture fixation plates from titanium alloy (model = "Ti Fix-It") materials. A recent clinical report documents some problems with the plates implanted into fractured limbs. Specifically, some plates have become permanently bent while patients are in rehab and doing partial weight bearing activities. Your boss asks you to review the technical report that was generated by the previous test engineer (whose job you now have!) and used to verify the design. The brief report states the following... "Ti Fix-It plates were manufactured from Ti-6Al-4V (grade 5) and machined into solid 150 mm long beams with a 4 mm thick and 15 mm wide cross section. Each Ti Fix-It plate was loaded in equilibrium in a 4-point bending test (set-up configuration is provided in drawing below), with an applied load of 1000N. The maximum stress in this set-up was less than the yield stress for the…arrow_forward00 T R %24 Bb R V qa du/webapps/assessment/take/launch.jsp?course_assessment_id%=_254968_1&course_id%3D 3565256_1&content id= 52826 * Question Completion Status: Attach File Browse Local Files Browse Content Collection QUESTION 2 A company needs to choose one supplier for a particular type of silicon wafer used'in the production of semiconductors. The company has three options. Supplier A sells the silicon wafers for $2.50 per wafer, independently of the number of wafers ordered. Supplier B sells the wafers for $2.40 each but does not consider an order for less than 2,000 wafers. Supplier C sells the wafers for $2.30 each but does not accept an order for less than 3,000 wafers. Assume an order setup cost of $100 and an annual requirement of 20,000 wafers. Assume a 20% annual interest rate for holding cost calculations. a. Which supplier should be chosen to minimize the total annual cost for the wafers, and what is the optimal order quantity? b. If the replenishment lead time for wafers…arrow_forward
- The following is a series of questions pertaining to the NSPE Code of Ethics. Please indicate whether the statements are true or false. These questions are provided by the NSPE. Note: This ethics test is intended solely to test individual knowledge of the specific language contained in the NSPE Code of Ethics and is not intended to measure individual knowledge of engineering ethics or the ethics of individual engineers or engineering students. Engineers shall not accept compensation, financial or otherwise,from more than one party for services on the same project, or for servicespertaining to the same project, unless the circumstances are fully disclosedarrow_forwardAfter creating a decision matrix for two types of materials used to design a safety belt, an engineer assigns a weight of 4 to nylon for thickness and a weight of 5 to polyester for thickness. The engineer also assigns a weight of 4 to nylon for strength and a weight of 3 to polyester for strength. Polyester is more expensive than nylon. Describe which material would be preferable to use for the safety belt, if cost is prioritized as a criterionarrow_forwardhand written plz 6. Design for , that is, the load can be taken by other members or the effect of fatigue failure otherwise mitigated, until the failed component can be detected and repaired or replaced. This approach is common in aircraft structural design. 7. create variations in dimensions, which can affect wear and fatigue properties. 8. is often used as the starting point to identify the most important problems and the most likely causes. 9. is a type of failure mode identification test, which use one/two samples to establish multiple design inherent failure modes, and establish operating and destruct limits of a product. 10. concerns the improvement in reliability, during use, that comes from field data feedback resulting in modifications.arrow_forward
- (b) 2000 light bulbs were tested by the manufacturer. After 500 hours of testing, it was found that 5 out of all the light bulbs subjected to testing have failed. Strict quality control has been implemented to eliminate premature failures. Assume the light bulb has a constant failure rate. What is the failure rate, Mean Time Before Failure (MTBF) and the reliability of the light bulb after 500 hours? l vangarrow_forwardsubject: quality control topic : six sigma What are the financial benefits are reported by the organization after the successful implementation in the world?arrow_forwardMECT361 Mechatronics Components and Instrumentation 8.1. Why is it not possible to connect sensors such as thermocouples, strain gages, and accelerometers directly to a digital computer or microprocessor? PLEASE GIVE ME THE REFRENCE I Will get zero if you didn't put the refrencearrow_forward
- Which tool helps to categorise risks into three colour-coded zones representing major, moderate, and minor risks Risk Priority Number Risk assessment matrix Failure Mode and Effects Analysis O Severity Matrixarrow_forwardTruncation errors are increased as the round-off errors are decreased.Group of answer choices True False Say, you have a thermometer and you are checking the temperature of a body that has a temperature of 36o Using your thermometer five times, it gives you the following measurements: 29oC, 29.2oC, 29.3oC, 28.9oC, and 29.1oC. What can we conclude about the accuracy and the precision of the thermometer?Group of answer choices The thermometer is not accurate and not precise The thermometer is faulty. The thermometer is accurate and precise The thermometer is not accurate but precise. Say, you have a thermometer and you are checking the temperature of a body that has a temperature of 36o Using your thermometer five times, it gives you the following measurements: 36oC, 35.6oC, 36oC, 37oC, and 36.2oC. What can we conclude about the accuracy and the precision of the thermometer?Group of answer choices The thermometer is accurate and precise. The thermometer is accurate but not precise. The…arrow_forwardAssignment 1: Killer Robot Summary of the case: Bart Matthews, a robot operator at Cybernetics, Inc., has been killed by an out- of-control robot named Robbie. The creator of the robot, Silicon Technologies, is also in a tight financial position and had hoped that the robot would put the company back on its feet. It has been determined that several situations contributed to the death of Matthews: 1. Improper methodology was used in developing the software. 2. Testing of the software was faked. 3. The company pressured Robbie's creators to by-pass testing. 4. Part of the software used in the robot was stolen from another vendor's application. 5. The programmer did not understand or know the code which he used. 6. Security measures used were illegal, and therefore all information gathered in regard to the case might not be permissible in court. 7. The project leader did not understand or use proper design methodologies. 8. The end-user interface was designed improperly. Questions for…arrow_forward
- Elements Of ElectromagneticsMechanical EngineeringISBN:9780190698614Author:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.Publisher:Oxford University PressMechanics of Materials (10th Edition)Mechanical EngineeringISBN:9780134319650Author:Russell C. HibbelerPublisher:PEARSONThermodynamics: An Engineering ApproachMechanical EngineeringISBN:9781259822674Author:Yunus A. Cengel Dr., Michael A. BolesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
- Control Systems EngineeringMechanical EngineeringISBN:9781118170519Author:Norman S. NisePublisher:WILEYMechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)Mechanical EngineeringISBN:9781337093347Author:Barry J. Goodno, James M. GerePublisher:Cengage LearningEngineering Mechanics: StaticsMechanical EngineeringISBN:9781118807330Author:James L. Meriam, L. G. Kraige, J. N. BoltonPublisher:WILEY