ECO 2020 INCLUSIVE ACCESS
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781260564617
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL HIGHER EDUCATION
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 33, Problem 1P
To determine
The government spending, tax cut and change in the amount of outstanding debt.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Which of the following is correct?
1) Expansionary fiscal policy during a recession means cutting taxes, increasing
government spending, or taking both actions.
2) The goal of expansionary fiscal policy is to rein in inflation.
3) Expansionary fiscal policy tends to lead to a smaller budget deficit.
O 4) Expansionary fiscal policy is always better than contractionary fiscal policy for
4)
the economy.
Suppose that the investment demand curve in a certain economy is such that investment declines by $110 billion for every 1
percentage point increase in the real interest rate. Also, suppose that the investment demand curve shifts rightward by $190 billion at
each real interest rate for every 1 percentage point increase in the expected rate of return from investment. If stimulus spending (an
expansionary fiscal policy) by government increases the real interest rate by 2 percentage points, but also raises the expected rate of
return on investment by 1 percentage point, how much investment, if any, will be crowded out?
Instructions: Enter your answer as a whole number.
billion
%24
Suppose that the investment demand curve in a certain economy is such that investment declines by $110 billion for every 1 percentage point increase in the real interest rate. Also, suppose that the investment demand curve shifts rightward by $170 billion at each real interest rate for every 1 percentage point increase in the expected rate of return from investment. If stimulus spending (an expansionary fiscal policy) by government increases the real interest rate by 2 percentage points, but also raises the expected rate of return on investment by 1 percentage point, how much investment, if any, will be crowded out?
Note:-
Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.
Answer completely.
You will get up vote for sure.
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- 9. True or false? If the statement is false, explain why: LO4 a. An internally held public debt is like a debt of the left hand owed to the right hand. b. The Federal Reserve and federal government agencies hold more than half the public debt. c. As a percentage of GDP, the federal debt held by the public was smaller in 2010 than it was in 1990. d. As a percentage of GDP, the total U.S. public debt is the highest such debt among the world’s advanced industrial nations.arrow_forwardIf government spending rises by $100, mps = 0.2, then the GDP multiplier is O 5 O 4 O 1arrow_forwardQUESTION 14 Assuming that the "equilibrium income" is $4,000 and the "full-employment" income is $8,000, which means a recessionary gap of $4,000, how much tax cut is needed to fill the gap if MPC is 0.50? O $7,000 O $5,000 O $3,000 O $4,000arrow_forward
- 9. Refer to the accompanying table in answering the questions that follow: L011.8 (1) Possible Levels (3) Aggregate Expenditures (2) Real Domestic (C, + 1, + X, + G), Millions of Employment, Output, Millions Millions 90 $500 $520 100 550 560 110 600 600 120 650 640 130 700 680 a. If full employment in this economy is 130 million, will there be an inflationary expenditure gap or a recessionary expenditure gap? What will be the consequence of this gap? By how much would aggregate expenditures in column 3 have to change at each level of GDP to eliminate the inflationary expenditure gap or the recessionary expenditure gap? What is the multiplier in this example? b. Will there be an inflationary expenditure gap or a recessionary expenditure gap if the full-employment level of output is $500 billion? By how much would aggregate expenditures in column 3 have to change at each level of GDP to eliminate the gap? What is the multiplier in this example? c. Assuming that investment, net exports,…arrow_forward#wk4-10 Suppose that the investment demand curve in a certain economy is such that investment declines by $120 billion for every 1 percentage point increase in the real interest rate. Also, suppose that the investment demand curve shifts rightward by $170 billion at each real interest rate for every 1 percentage point increase in the expected rate of return from investment.If stimulus spending (an expansionary fiscal policy) by government increases the real interest rate by 2 percentage points, but also raises the expected rate of return on investment by 1 percentage point, how much investment, if any, will be crowded out?$ billionarrow_forwardWhich of the following statements is not true? A decrease in federal income tax rates is an example of fiscal policy that affects GDP through consumption adjustments. O Automatic stabilizers act to moderate business cycles primarily through the personal income and consumption channels. O Other things equal, the steeper the slope of the aggregate supply curve, the less effective will be the expansionary fiscal policy. When aggregate expenditure (AE) exceed Real GDP, inventory levels rise unexpectedly, which sends a signal to firms that they have overproduced, so they cut back on production.arrow_forward
- 6. Assume that a hypothetical economy with an MPC of 0.75 is experiencing severe recession. By how much would government spending have to rise to shift the aggregate demand curve rightward by $35 billion? How large a tax cut would be needed to achieve the same increase in aggregate demand? Determine one possible combination of government spending increases and tax increases that would accomplish the same goal without changing the amount of outstanding debt.arrow_forwardConsider an economy that has the following GDP and price levels if there was no fiscal policy: Year 1 2 3 Potential real GDP $18 trillion $18.2 trillion $18.7 trillion Actual real GDP $18 trillion $18.3 trillion $18.5 trillion Price level 175 182 187 What should the government do if it wants the real GDP at its potential level in year 1 and there were no fiscal policy lags? Choose one: O A. recommend an expansionary fiscal policy B. recommend a contractionary fiscal policy O C. no change is necessary See Hintarrow_forwardFigure: Aggregate Expenditures Curve II Aggregate expenditures (per year) $800 Reference: Ref 11-16 45-degree line AE $2,000 Real GDP (per year) (Figure: Aggregate Expenditures Curve II) The slope of the aggregate expenditures curve in the aggregate expenditures model shown in this figure is: O 45 degrees. O 0.6. O 0.5. O 0.25.arrow_forward
- Suppose real GDP is $1.7 trillion, potential real GDP is $1.8 trillion, and the federal government plans to use fiscal policy to restore the economy to potential real GDP. Assuming a constant price level, the federal government would need to increase government purchases by more than $100 billion. O None of the above is correct. The federal government must decrease government purchases in this case. O $100 billion. O less than $100 billion.arrow_forwardSuppose that the MPC is 0,80 and there is an AD excess of $1,200 million. Which of the following is an appropriate desired fiscal restraint? O $240 million decrease in government spending. $1.200 million decrease in government spending. O S1,500 million decrease in government spending. $960 million decrease in government spending.arrow_forward10.1For each of the following events,explain the short-run and long-run effects on output and price level,assuming policymakers take no action. a) The stock market declines sharply,reducing consumers' wealth. b) The federal government increases spending on national defence. 10.2 In which of the following circumstances is expansionary fiscal policy more likely to lead to a short-run increase in investment?Explain. a)When the investment accelarator is large or when it is small?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education