The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305967304
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 3, Problem 2BS
Summary Introduction
Case summary: There are various motions which are used in different situations. The law favored the defendant and there was an issue of the question of law only.
To find: The purpose for which the motions can be used and the motion which applies in the above situation.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
The Supreme Court of State G decided that the U.S. Constitution requires professors to warn students of their right to remain silent before questioning the students about cheating. This ruling directly conflicts with a decision of the Federal Court of Appeals for the circuit that includes State G. a. Must the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals withdraw its ruling? b. Must the Supreme Court of State G withdraw its ruling?
In Kelo v. New London (mentioned in Chapter 12 on p. 429), the U.S. Supreme Court made one of its most controversial decisions in the last 20 years; in a brief summary, the Court dramatically expanded the meaning of the phrase “for public use.”
Please find and read the actual Kelo case, both the majority and the dissenting opinions, and please indicate in a one to two-page, double-spaced paper, what the majority and dissent ruled and why, and whether you agree with the majority or dissent, explaining your rationale. Make sure to discuss relevant legal principles as appropriate.
True-False and Multiple Choice Questions. 1. A trial de novo is a trial with new discovery, testimony, and evidence.2. If th Delaware Court of Common Pleas (a general trail court and court of record) makes a common law decision, that decision becomes precedent for all Delaware courts.3. Primary methods of alternative dispute resolution include litigation, mediation and arbitration.4. Delivering the complaint and attached summons to the defendant establishes in personam judgment for the court,5. Sandra sued her employer, Cape Inc., claiming that she was wrongfully terminated from her is a criminal lawsuit.6. The jury decides the law and the judge decides the facts.7. The categorical imperative approach to ethical decision making is to ask the following question “which alternative causes the greatest good (or least harm) to the most people?â€8. A summons is a paper ordering a defendant to answer a complaint within a certain time.9. According to the…
Chapter 3 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- 1) A black firefighter alleges that each time he is transferred from one fire station to another, he must take his bed with him, on orders of the fire chief. The fire chief defends on the basis that it is a legitimate decision because white firefighters would not want to sleep in the same bed in which a black firefighter slept. Is this illegal under Title VII? Explain 2) A white college receptionist is fired when it is found that she told a black college applicant that the applications for admissions are distinguished by race by the notation of a small Rh in the corner of black applicants’ applications.”Rh,”she says, is her supervisor’s term for “raisin heads, “which he calls African-Americans. Is this employee entitled to reinstatement? 3) jose and Cesar, both Hispanic, are carpenters employed by a contractor to help build an office building in Maryland. While working, Jose and Cesar discover that they are being paid less than non-Hispanic employees. In addition, they allege a hostile…arrow_forwardNow explain what would be Harvey's best argument in response to the argument on provocation? In other words, argue on behalf of Harvey that there was no provocation of the dog. (Messa v. Sullivan)arrow_forwarda. Provide a reasonable textbook definition of what intoxication in law means with the use of examples. b. Use your critical analysis skill to explain how a person can avoid a contract entered into under intoxication. Use the case laws below and state the issue, facts, and judgment of them. Halsted v. Globe Indemnity Co. (1935) Jackson v. Alexander (1879) Matthews v. Baxter (1873)arrow_forward
- With respect to the doctrine on Consideration, Past Consideration is ‘irrelevant’ Discuss this statement, with the following requirements;1. Three (3) applicable case laws on the subject matter2. Clearly state: The issue, Basic facts of the Cases, The Judgementarrow_forwardIn a lawsuit, after the complaint and summons are served on the defendant, what must the defendant do to avoid a default judgment? file and serve an answer on the plaintiff file counterclaims serve discovery responses on the plaintiff none of the abovearrow_forwardCasey is on trial under criminal allegations that she engaged in fraudulent behavior at the company she manages. She is worried when the plaintiff alleges that it has "unambiguous proof" that Casey is guilty. Which of the following is most likely true? If the plaintiff provides proof only up to the level of "clear and convincing," Casey can still be acquitted. Casey need not worry about the plaintiff's evidence, since parties tend to boast about the level of proof they can establish anyway. If the plaintiff meets a "clear and convincing" burden of proof, Casey will be found guilty. The plaintiff will most likely prove Casey is guilty, since criminal charges only need to meet a prima facie burden of proof.arrow_forward
- An offer can be defined as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous. Critically discuss this statement, with the following requirements; 1. On These six applicable case law on the subject matter: Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1892) Gibson v. Manchester City Council (1979) Basic facts Harvey v. Facey (1893) Stevenson, Jacques & Co. v. McLean (1880) Routledge v. Grant (1828) Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd (1953) 2. Thoroughly and in full detail explain • The issue • Basic facts of the Cases • The Judgement Note. • You cannot copy and paste the various cases. • You are required to discuss via a few paragraphs, what was the issue, basic facts and the judgement. • Conclude by applying the mentioned cases to the issue at hand in respect of question above.…arrow_forwardWhich of the following was the issue in the case of Parker? Were there any issues of fact so that the trial court should not have granted summary judgment? A summary judgment can only be granted if there are no issues of fact. Shirley MacLaine Parker had a contract with Fox to do a musical movie in CA. O Parker wins.arrow_forwardIn case of non-compatibility of the conflict displayed before the primary court it is placed before O a. Court of Appeal O b. Individual Circuit Court consisting of one judge O c. Primary Court consisting of three judges O d. Regular Courtsarrow_forward
- Michael Hauck claimed that he was discharged by his employer, Sabine Pilot Service, because he refused its direction to perform the illegal act of pumping the bilges of the employer’s vessel into the waterways. Hauck was an employee at will, and Sabine contends that it therefore had the right to discharge him without having to show cause. Hauck brought a wrongful discharge action against Sabine. Decide.Please give your answer using the IRAC format. Issue: Call of the QuestionRule: Rule of Law to be applied to properly answer the questionAnalysis: Applying the rule of law to the facts of the problem presentedConclusion: Answer to the Issuearrow_forward15. What is the contra proferentem doctrine? It is a doctrine of interpretation stating that where a term is ambiguous the judge will apply the interpretation that most closely aligns with any legislated standard It is a doctrine of interpretation stating that where a term is ambiguous the judge will apply the interpretation that best suits the party that did not draw up the contract It is a doctrine of interpretation stating that where a term is ambiguous the judge will apply the interpretation that best suits the party that drew up the contract It is a doctrine of interpretation stating that where a term is ambiguous the judge will apply the interpretation that most closely aligns with the contracts of other employees at the firmarrow_forwardFind a case with the following citation: 792 F.3d 1146. Assume your client lives in Maine that this case is relevant to your clients issue. Is this case authoritative for your client?a. Yes, as long as the facts of the case are identical to the facts of your clients case. b. Yes, as long as the facts of the case are similar to the facts of your clients case.c. No.d. No, but only because the case is over five years old, and therefore no longer good law.e. Unable to tell from the fact given in this question.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education