a)
Case summary:
It is given that Company V admitted to criminal wrongdoing in 2017. They have confirmed that they cheated on emission test of two-liter diesel engines, which were designed in 2005 to satisfy the emission standards. However, the engines dd not perform as per planned. Later, they have designed a software to pass the emission test.
There was a large difference between the actual output of the vehicle and the measured emission. Hence, they have started investigating on this issue and the CEO of the firm lost his job due to this scandal.
To determine: Why Company A made the decision over the emission problem.
b)
Case summary:
It is given that Company V admitted to criminal wrongdoing in 2017. They have confirmed that they cheated on emission test of two-liter diesel engines, which were designed in 2005 to satisfy the emission standards. However, the engines dd not perform as per planned. Later, they have designed a software to pass the emission test.
There was a large difference between the actual output of the vehicle and the measured emission. Hence, they have started investigating on this issue and the CEO of the firm lost his job due to this scandal.
To determine: Whether Person X agree with the decision to go after individual managers in this case.
c)
Case summary:
It is given that Company V admitted to criminal wrongdoing in 2017. They have confirmed that they cheated on emission test of two-liter diesel engines, which were designed in 2005 to satisfy the emission standards. However, the engines dd not perform as per planned. Later, they have designed a software to pass the emission test.
There was a large difference between the actual output of the vehicle and the measured emission. Hence, they have started investigating on this issue and the CEO of the firm lost his job due to this scandal.
To determine: The competitive implications of the actions of Company V.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution- Pollution remediation obligations should be recognized if which of the following obligating events has occurred? Multiple Choice A violation of a pollution prevention permit has occurred. All of the given items are obligating events that would require recognition of a pollution remediation obligation. The government is compelled to take remediation action due to imminent endangerment to the public health. The government is named or will be named as the responsible or potentially responsible party to a remediation.arrow_forwardKnown for its stylish ready-to-assemble home furnishings, IKEA has long relied on an extensive supplier net- work to manufacture its products and support its rapid global expansion. It has worked hard to develop a successful approach to encourage high ethical standards among its suppliers, including standards concerning the notoriously difficult issue of child labor. IKEA's initial plan to combat the use of child labor by its suppliers involved (1) contracts that threatened immediate cancellation and (2) random audits by a thirdparty partner. Despite these safeguards, the company discovered that some of its Indian suppliers were still employing children. IKEA realized that this issue would crop up again and again if it continued to use low-cost suppliers in developing countries—a critical element in its cost-containment strategy. 2020-2021 Page 7 of 8 Using child labor, for example, can signal bigger problems: production inefficiencies that require the lowest cost labor, lack of…arrow_forwardNevada passes a statute that any 18-wheel truck passing through Nevada must meet a Clean Fuel Fleet Exhaust Emission Standard of no more than 2.8 nitrous oxide (NOx). The federal statute requirement for such trucks is no more than 3.8 NOx. Carlton is driving his 18-wheeler cross-country to deliver a load and stops at a Nevada weigh station. The weigh station officer inspects Carlton’s documents, notes that Carlton’s truck has a 3.4 NOx emission level, and issues a citation. On what grounds might Carlton fight this citation?arrow_forward
- Red Cross insurance company provide 8 million Americans with health-care financing. They paid millions of dollars for care attributable to illnesses related to tobacco use. In 1998, to recover some of this money, they sued the tobacco companies alleging fraud. They claimed that since 1953 the defendants conspired to addict millions of Americans to cigarettes and other tobacco products by misrepresenting the safety of nicotine and its addictive properties. The defendants’ success caused lung, throat, and other cancers, as well as heart disease, stroke, emphysema, and other illnesses to members of Red Cross plans, which Red Cross was required to pay. At trial, the defendants asked the court to dismiss the case on the ground that the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue. Does Red Cross have standing in this case? © a. No, Red Cross does not have standing because their claim should be filed against the insured who chose to smoke and risked these illnesses. b.…arrow_forwardFor the scenario below, determine the legality of the company's actions. Ioncorp sells cabinets nationwide to the furniture company Blinkorp. It makes an agreement that Blinkorp will only sell Ioncorp cabinets in its warehouses. Strictly illegal Legal Illegal, depending on impactarrow_forwardDQ3: Corporate Ethics: Discuss the situations in which the corporate entity should be disregarded. Describe any situations they know of in which the behavior of a company was so socially repugnant that the owners should have been held personally liable.arrow_forward
- Please discuss the legal and ethical status of the physician's actions in the following case. Include in your analysis any relevant laws A complainant alleged that a private practice physician denied her access to her medical records, because the complainant had an outstanding balance for services the physician had provided. The physician openly admitted that the complainant was not given access to her medical record because of the outstanding balance. The physician noted that it is clearly spelled out in the information given to patients that access to their records is contingent on payment in full.arrow_forwardClaims professionals are not personally and professionally responsible for making ethical decisions. True Falsearrow_forward1. Application of Consumer Protection Laws A number of laws have been enacted specifically to define the rights of consumers who enter into credit transactions. It is next to impossible to live in modern society without entering into some form of credit transaction so it is important for the consumer to know and understand their rights. Companies that extend or collect on delinquent credit must also know their obligations to the consumer. Read the statements. Drag and drop each item into the law which most specifically applies to the situation. Each category should contain only three statements. Skip Tracing. Loan Term. Warranties. Credit Cards. Check/Debit Cards. Geographic Limitation. Right to Dispute or Explain. Credit Charges. FCRA Obscenities. Creditor Exemption. TLA suran FDCPA Investigative Reports. Recrediting. FCBA Red Lining. Delinquency Charges. None of the Categories Required informationarrow_forward
- Which of the following regulations mandates that mortgage loan originators (MOS) are required to inform a consumer of their right to opt out from a lender disciosing nonpublic personal information about the consur to a nonaffiliated third party? A) Gramm Leach Bliley Act B) Truth in Lending Act (TILA) C) Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) D) Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA)arrow_forwardLegal consequences following a successful cyberattack on a well-known organization often include O the loss of cash, inventory, equipment, patents, copyrights, trade secrets, and data the diversion of resources to the operation of back-up procedures O lawsuits initiated by consumers who incurred damages O an erosion of trust previously established with customers, suppliers, and partnersarrow_forward3. The practice of corporate social responsibility necessitates writing contracts between donors and their recipients. * O TRUE O FALSEarrow_forward
- Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationManagement (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSONSpreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSONBusiness Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSONFundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON