The
Answer to Problem 1CQQ
Option ‘d’ is the correct answer.
Explanation of Solution
Option (d)
Tyler has the absolute advantage in washing, since he can wash 3 cars per hour, while Mateo can only wash 2 cars per hour. None has the absolute advantage in mowing as both can only mow 1 lawn in an hour’s time. So option ‘d’ is correct.
Option (a)
Mateo can only wash 2 cars per hours, whereas Tyler can wash 3 cars in the same amount of time. So Mateo does not have the absolute advantage in washing cars. Also, both do not have the advantage over the other in mowing the lawn. So option ‘a’ is incorrect.
Option (b)
Tyler has an absolute advantage in washing, since he can wash 3 cars per hour, while Mateo can only wash 2 cars per hour but both do not have the advantage over the other in mowing the lawn. So option ‘b’ is incorrect.
Option (c)
None has the absolute advantage in mowing as both can only mow 1 lawn in an hour’s time but Tyler has the absolute advantage in washing, since he can wash 3 cars per hour, while Mateo can only wash 2 cars per hour. So option ‘c’ is incorrect.
Concept Introduction:
Absolute advantage: It is the ability to produce a good using fewer inputs than another producer does.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
PRICIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS
- Which of these scenarios is inefficient and why?arrow_forward6. Given that Nathan has 10 acres and can grow 15 bales of hay or 40 bushels of corn on anacre, while Simon has 10 acres and can grow 20 bales of hay or 35 bushels of corn per acre a. What is the maximum amount of corn and hay that they can jointly produce?b. Does Nathan have a comparative advantage in growing hay?c. Does Simon have an absolute advantage in growing hay?d. What is the opportunity cost to Nathan of one bale of hay?arrow_forward. Country A and Country B are two countries that each produce t-shirts (T) and sneakers (S). From its available resources and technology Country A can produce 100 t-shirts and 0 sneakers or 0 t- shirts and 200 sneakers or any combination of t-shirts and sneakers that sits on Country A's linear PPF. From its available resources and technology Country B can produce 50 t-shirts and 0 sneaker or 0 t-shirt and 50 sneakers or any combination of t-shirts and sneakers that sits on Country B's linear PPF. a. On two separate graphs draw the PPF for Country A and Country B. Measure t-shirts on the vertical axis and sneakers on the horizontal axis.arrow_forward
- Please no written by hand and no imagearrow_forwardPaul's PPF Sue's PPF Cheese Cheese 100 80 60 Ham 30 Ham Based on the graph above, which of the following statements is true? The Principle of Absolute Advantage does not help us determine how trade would benefit Paul and Sue. O Sue would lose out by trading with Paul, because she is less competitive than Paul in the production of both goods. O Paul has nothing to gain from trading with Sue, since he is better in making both goods. Sue has an absolute advantage in the production of cheese.arrow_forwardConsider two individuals, Fred and Barney. In one hour, Fred can produceeither 15 gallons of beer, or 3 gallons of wine. In one hour, Barney can produce2 gallons of beer or 4 gallons of wine. Assume both goods can be produced incontinuous quantities. Assume that each person wants to consume 3 gallons of wine, then as muchbeer as they can. Determine what each person will end up consumingi) when they cannot trade.ii) when they can trade at a price of 1gallon wine = 2 gallons beer.Use this to explain why trade benefits both consumers.arrow_forward
- 1. Assume you are stranded on an island with another person. The table below gives the maximum amounts that you and the other person can produce per day, if you devote all your resources to the production of that one good. Further, assume both you and the other person face constant opportunity costs in production. You Other Person Food (lbs.) 30 40 Good Water (gallons) 90 150 a. What is the pattern of absolute advantage? In other words, who has absolute advantage in food production? In water production?arrow_forward2. Comparative and absolute advantage Felix and Janet are farmers. Each one owns a 20-acre plot of land. The following table shows the amount of rye and corn each farmer can produce per year on a given acre. Each farmer chooses whether to devote all acres to producing rye or corn or to produce rye on some of the land and corn on the rest. Rye Corn (Bushels per acre) (Bushels per acre) Felix 40 8 Janet 28 7 On the following graph, use the blue line (circle symbol) to plot Felix's production possibilities frontier (PPF), and use the purple line (diamond symbol) to plot Janet's PPF. (?) 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 RYE (Bushels) Felix has an absolute advantage in the production of rye, and Felix has an absolute advantage in the production of corn. Felix's opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of corn is bushels of rye, whereas Janet's opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of corn is bushels of rye. Because Felix has a higher…arrow_forward1. Using the following combinations as Production Possibilities data for iPads and HDTVS, answer the following questions: А В D iPads 5,000 4,500 3,500 2,000 HDTVS 1,000 2,000 3.000 4,000 In the Production Possibilities Function and schedule shown above, a production combination of 3,500 iPads and 1,500 HDTVS would enjoy (a utility / an economy / an opportunity cost / a free lunch / an international trade) [circle all that apply] if one or more resources are used more efficiently. Consequently, if this happens, this economy's production possibilities will become (attainable / unattainable / efficient / inefficient / impossible with current resources) [circle all that apply]. е.arrow_forward
- Good X Country 1 Country 2 150 Good X 120 95 80 90 72 ICr 62 60 50 IC 30 35 18 33 45 55 60 78 Good Y 30 90 120 150 Good Y Use the figure above to answer the following question: How much is Country 2 consuming in autarky? O 72 of Good X and 83 of Good Y and Country 1 is consuming 60 of Good X and 53 of Good Y. O 62 of Good Y and 60 of Good X and Country 1 is consuming 30 of Good X and 55 of Good Y. 62 of Good X and 60 of Good Y and Country 1 is consuming 55 of Good X and 30 of Good Y. 62 of Good X and 60 of Good Y and Country 1 is consuming 30 of Good X and 55 of Good Y.arrow_forwardSuppose that Ned can produce either potato chips or computer chips. If he only produces potato chips he can produce 16 bags a day. If he only produces computer chips, he can produce 12 in a day. Drag the endpoints of the line to plot his production possibilities frontier (PPF) on the graph. 20 20 18 Bags of Potato Chips 16 14 12 10 8 60 4 2 What is the opportunity cost of computer chip production in terms of potato chips? Ned's PPF 1/2 3/4 2 16 12 4/3 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Computer chipsarrow_forwardOnce again, In an hour, Mateo can wash 2 cars or mow 1 lawn, and Tyler can wash 3 cars or mow 1 Lawn. Who has the comparive advantage in car washing and who has the camparative advantage in lawn mowing? a. Mateo in washing, Tyler in mowing b.Tyler in washing, Mateo in mowing. c. Mateo in washing, nither in mowing. d. Tyler in washing, neither in mowing.arrow_forward
- Principles of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning