ECONOMICS W/CONNECT+20 >C<
20th Edition
ISBN: 9781259714993
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCG CUSTOM
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 28, Problem 11DQ
To determine
Relation between the fertility rate and growth and the impact of inverse dependency ratio on the growth of real GDP .
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Say that the average worker in Canada has a
productivity level of $30 per hour while the average
worker in the United Kingdom has a productivity level
34.
of $25 per hour (both measured in U.S. dollars). Over
the next five years, say that worker productivity in
Canada grows at 1% per year while worker productivity
in the UK grows 3% per year. After five years, who will
have the higher productivity level, and by how much?
Assume real per capita GDP in West Swimsuit is $8,000 while in South Darlinia it is $2,000. The annual growth rate in West Swimsuit is 2.33%, while in South Darlinia it is 7%. How many years will it take for South Darlinia to catch up to the real per capita GDP of West Swimsuit?
What will the income of the two countries be when it is equal?
type answer only. Do it correctly. Multiple votes will given accordingly.
Suppose that U.S. real GDP per capita is $50,000 and grows on average at 3% per year.
How long will it take for U.S. real GDP per capita to double at this growth rate?
If this growth rate continues, what will U.S. real GDP
r capita be in 70 years? S
Suppose that U.S. real GDP per capita is $50,000 and grows on average at 5% per year (rather than 3% a year)
How long will it take for U.S. real GDP per capita to double at this growth rate?
years (round to nearest year)
If this growth rate continues, what will U.S. real GDP per capita be in 70 years? S
years (round to nearest year)
Chapter 28 Solutions
ECONOMICS W/CONNECT+20 >C<
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose, a country X has a GDP level of 4, 50,000 and a growth rate of 10% in 2007(calculated at the end of the fiscal year 2007). The experts predict that the growth ofthe economy of Country X will gradually slowdown in the coming years. Moreprecisely, they foresee the following growth rates for the future:2007 – 2010 = 10%2010 – 2013 = 9%2013 – 2016 = 7.5%2016 – 2019 = 5%2019 – on = 1% Hint: The list above should be read as saying that, for instance, the growth rate fromthe end of the fiscal year 2007 until the end of 2010 will be 10 %, then from the end of2010 until the end of 2013 it will be 9% and so on. Assuming that the predictions of the experts listed above are accurate, when in thefuture will Country X’s GDP double compared to the GDP level of 2007? Consider now the more optimistic scenario in which the economy does not slow downand the current growth rate of 10% remains constant in the coming years. How longwill it take for the GDP level to double in this scenario? Express…arrow_forwardSuppose China’s GDP is growing by 7% a year and its population grows by 1% a year. Also suppose that US GDP grows by 3% a year and its population grows by 1% a year, and that in 2019 US GDP is 1.5 times China’s while US population is one quarter of China’s. If these growth rates continue By what year will China’s GDP double? Its population? Its per capita GDP?In what year will China’s GDP equal US GDP?In what year will China’s GDP per capita equal US GDP per capita?arrow_forwardWhat has been the average annual growth rate of U.S. real GDP per person over the 120 years from 1900 to 2020? In which decade, beginning with the 1960s, was the growth of potential GDP per person greatest and slowest? Over the 120 years from 1900 to 2020, the average annual growth rate of U.S. real GDP per person is ____ percentarrow_forward
- A country faces diminishing marginal returns when increasing it's capital stock. If this country added 100 units of capital last year and saw their GDP rise by $1,000 per person, what would you expect to happen if they had added 200 units of capital instead? O It is impossible to tell what would happen GDP would increase by less than another $1,000 per person GDP would increase by another $1,000 per person GDP would increase by more than another $1,000 per personarrow_forwardAssume real per capita GDP in West Swimsuit is $8,000 while in South Darlinia it is $2,000. The annual growth rate in West Swimsuit is 2.33%, while in South Darlinia it is 7%. How many years will it take for South Darlinia to catch up to the real per capita GDP of West Swimsuit? What will the income of the two countries be when it is equal? solve it correctly please. I will rate accordingly. Ty-ped answer please...arrow_forwardThe red budget line depicts China in 1980 before there was any Communist Party policy about the number of children a Chinese woman could choose to have. Between 1980 and 2020, Chinese wages and GDP per capita (income) increased due to the abandonment of a Communist/Socialist economic system and a partial movement toward a free market capitalist system. The rotation from the red to the blue budget line depicts higher wages and the increased GDP per capita that resulted. China's One Child Policy All Other Goods (Income) 15K IC6 4K IC, 2020 IC3 1980 8. 1 4 Children (Fertility Rate)arrow_forward
- A country faces diminishing marginal returns when increasing it's capital stock. If this country added 1,000 units of capital last year and saw their GDP rise by $500 per person, what would you expect to happen if they had added 2,000 units of capital instead? O GDP would increase by another $500 per person O GDP would increase by less than another $500 per person O GDP would increase by more than another $500 per person O It is impossible to tell what would happen What is a potential downside of using patents to promote the creation of new technology? Without a market test, patents might be given to technology which ends up being useless. O Government money may be directed towards unproductive goals. It slows the spread and development of those ideas by restricting competition. They prohibit competition forever. What is the law of diminishing marginal returns?arrow_forwardSuppose that the current (fifi rst) generation consists of 1 million people, half of whom are women. If the total fertility rate is 1.3 and the only way people die is of old age, how big will the fourth generation (the great-grandchildren) be? How much smaller (in percentage terms) is each generation than the previous generation? How much smaller (in percentage terms) is the fourth generation than the fifirst generation? Are you surprised by how quickly the population declines?arrow_forwardSuppose that work hours in New Zombie are 200 in year 1 and productivity is $8 per hour worked. What is New Zombie’s real GDP? If work hours increase to 210 in year 2 and productivity rises to $10 per hour, what is New Zombie’s rate of economic growth? Explain why sustained long-term economic growth comes from increases in labor productivity. Why do you think the trend rate of U.S. productivity growth has increased since the earlier 1973–1995 period?arrow_forward
- Suppose that the current (first) generation consists of 1 million people, half of whom are women. Assume the total fertility rate is 1.2 and the only way people die is of old age. Instructions: In part a, enter your answer as a whole number. In parts b and c, round your answers to 2 decimal places. a. How big will the fourth generation (the great-grandchildren) be? ___ people b. How much smaller (in percentage terms) is each generation than the previous generation? ___ percent c. How much smaller (in percentage terms) is the fourth generation than the first generation? ___ percentarrow_forwardSuppose that work hours in New Zombie are 200 in year 1 and productivity is $8 per hour worked. What is New Zombie’s real GDP? If work hours increase to 210 in year 2 and productivity rises to $10 per hour, what is New Zombie’s rate of economic growth? Explain why sustained long-term economic growth comes from increases in labor productivity. Why do you think the trend rate of U.S. productivity growth has increased since the earlier 1973–1995 period? The quantity of labor and increases in labor productivity are important sources of economic growth. Between 1953 and 2015, in the US economy the labor force increased from 63 million to 158 million workers. Productivity growth has usually been the more significant factor. To calculate real GDP in a given year you have to multiply hours worked by productivity. Suppose that New Zombie has adopted the framework used by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics to calculate its labor force statistics. Following information is extracted from a…arrow_forwardBetween 1970 and 2005, China’s GDP per capita grew at an average rate of 7.3% per year while GDP per capita in the US grew at an average rate of 2.2%. In 2005, US GDP per capita was $36,806 and Chinese GDP per capita was $5,955. Assuming that the two countries continue to grow at these rates, in what year will China overtake the US in terms of GDP per capita?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:OpenStax
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc