The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305967304
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 27, Problem 5BCP
Summary Introduction
Case summary:A company, DSC sells its products to various companies including a company, SSP. A customer of SSP purchased the product of DSC from two competitors of SSP, due to which it lost its sales to that customer and others. The price of SSP was reported 10 to 15 percent higher than other companies. Company SSP sues company DSC for
To explain: The requirement to make claims under section 2 of the Clayton act by the company, SSP.
Summary Introduction
Case summary: A company, DSC sells its products to various companies including a company, SSP. A customer of SSP purchased the product of DSC from two competitors of SSP, due to which it lost its sales to that customer and others. The price of SSP was reported 10 to 15 percent higher than other companies. Company SSP sues company DSC for price discrimination.
To find:The facts which can prove the claim of company SSP.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Gardner-Denver is the largest manufacturer of ratchet wrenches and their replacement parts in the United States. Gardner-Denver had two different lists of prices for its wrenches and parts. Its blue list had parts that, if purchased in quantities of five or more, were available for substantially less than its white list prices
1 - Purport
2 - Did Gardner-Denver engage in price discrimination with its two price lists?
3- Assuming that Gardner-Denver has engaged in price discrimination, what law would be violated in such situation?
4- Which agency of the federal government is responsible to investigate cases that may involve price discrimination?
Known for its stylish ready-to-assemble home furnishings, IKEA has long relied on an extensive supplier net- work to manufacture its products and support its rapid global expansion. It has worked hard to develop a successful approach to encourage high ethical standards among its suppliers, including standards concerning the notoriously difficult issue of child labor. IKEA's initial plan to combat the use of child labor by its suppliers involved (1) contracts that threatened immediate cancellation and (2) random audits by a thirdparty partner. Despite these safeguards, the company discovered that some of its Indian suppliers were still employing children. IKEA realized that this issue would crop up again and again if it continued to use low-cost suppliers in developing countries—a critical element in its cost-containment strategy. 2020-2021 Page 7 of 8 Using child labor, for example, can signal bigger problems: production inefficiencies that require the lowest cost labor, lack of…
In 1923, DuPont was granted the exclusive right to make and sell cellophane in North America. In 1927, the company introduced a moisture-proof brand of cello- phane that was ideal for various wrapping needs. Although more expensive than most competing wrapping, it offered a desired combination of transparency, strength, and cost. Except for its permeability to gases, however, cellophane had no qualities that a number of competing materials did not possess as well. Cellophane sales increased dramatically, and by 1950, DuPont produced almost 75 percent of the cellophane sold in the United States. Nevertheless, sales of the material constituted less than 20 percent of the sales of “flexible packaging materials.” The United States brought an action, contending that by so dominating cellophane production, DuPont had monopolized a part of trade or commerce in violation of the Sherman Act. DuPont argued that it had not monopolized because it did not have the power to control the price of…
Chapter 27 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- In 1992 the state of California charged Sears Auto Centers with overcharging customers for unneeded or unperformed repairs. Sears agreed to a settlement that could cost as much as $20 million. Sears had compensated its salespeople with commissions based on total sales. Following the settlement, Sears dropped the commissions and went to a straight salary. Sears recently indicated that it is planning to reinstate commissions for salespeople in their Auto Centers. It even plans on paying commissions for selling customers brake jobs and wheel alignments. These two products were the core of the 1992 scandal. Sears says that it has taken steps to prevent a recurrence of past problems. In particular, the decision right to recommend repairs is granted to mechanics who are paid a straight salary. Sales consultants are paid commissions for selling repair services but are not authorized to recommend repairs. Under the old system that caused problems, these individuals diagnosed repair…arrow_forwardA computer manufacturer terminating an electronic store retailer's contract to sell the manufacturer's computers because the electronic store sold the manufacturer's computers at a price which the manufacturer deemed too low is: a per se violation of the Sherman Act. resale price maintenance subject to a rule of reason review. price fixing. none of the above.arrow_forwardYou are President and CEO of Apex Business Systems, Inc. (Apex). Apex, through its purchasing agent, bought a new microwave from Inki Appliances Company (Inki) who sells microwaves on a daily basis. There was no written or oral warranty given when the sale was made. The microwave stopped working one week after it was placed it in the company kitchen. Assume also that nobody misused the microwave or in any way caused it to quit working. The purchasing agent returned the microwave three days after it quit working. The owner of Inki refused to repair or replace the microwave or offer a refund. Prepare a demand letter to be sent to Inki.arrow_forward
- The National Society of Professional Engineers (Society) had an ethics rule that prohibited member engineers from disclosing or discussing price and fee information with customers until after the customer had hired a particular engineer. This rule against competitive bidding was designed to maintain high standards in the field of engineering. The Society felt that competitive pressure to offer engineering services at the lowest possible price would encourage engineers to design and specify inefficient, unsafe, and unnecessarily expensive structures and construction methods. According to the Society, awarding engineering contracts to the lowest bidder, regardless of quality, would be dangerous to the public health, safety, and welfare. The Society emphasizes that the rule is not an agreement to fix prices. Rather, it claims the rule was drafted by experienced, highly trained professional engineers to prevent public harm and is therefore reasonable. Does the rule unreasonably restrain…arrow_forwardA&P Grocery Stores decided to sell its own brand of canned milk (referred to as private label milk). A&P asked its longtime supplier, Borden, to submit an offer to produce the private label milk. Bowman Dairy also submitted a bid, which was lower than Borden’s. A&P’s Chicago buyer then contacted Borden and said, “I have a bid in my pocket. You people are so far out of line it is not even funny. You are not even in the ballpark.” The Borden representative asked for more details but was told only that a $50,000 improvement in Borden’s bid “would not be a drop in the bucket.” A&P was one of Borden’s largest customers in the Chicago area. Furthermore, Borden had just invested more than $5 million in a new dairy facility in Illinois. The loss of the A&P account would result in underutilization of the plant. Borden lowered its bid by more than $400,000. The Federal Trade Commission charged Borden with price discrimination, but Borden maintained it was simply meeting the…arrow_forwardFor the scenario below, determine the legality of the company's actions. Lilcorp manufactures budget speaker systems for Bigcorp. It arranges an agreement wherein Bigcorp may not charge more than $300 for a speaker system. Strictly illegal Legal Illegal, depending on impactarrow_forward
- Due to uncertainty whether or not a new tax law is applicable to printing companies, ABC Printers submitted a legal query to the BIR on the issue. The BIR issued a ruling that printing companies are not covered by the new law. Relying on this ruling, ABC Printers did not pay the said tax. Subsequently however, the BIR reversed the ruling and issued a new one stating that the tax covers printing companies. Could the BIR assess ABC Printers for back taxes corresponding to the years before the new ruling? a) Yes, because taxation is the rule and exemption is the exception b) Yes, because taxes are the lifeblood of the government c) No, the BIR is not allowed to reverse its ruling d) No, reversal of a ruling shall not be given a retroactive application if it will be prejudicial to the taxpayer.arrow_forwardthe major federal legislation in Canada that defines illegal practices, including price fixing, bid rigging, price discrimination, predatory pricing, double ticketing, resale price maintenance, bait and switch selling, and pyramid selling occurs when false or deceptive comparisons or distorted claims are made concerning a competitor's product, services, or property comprise principle and standards that guide behaviour in the world of business may be incurred when an unfair and untrue statement is made about a competitor in writing the statement becomes actionable when it is communicated to a third party and can be interpreted as damaging the company the foundation for partnering-style relationship, product, customer, and presentation strategies an attempt to influence the person receiving the "gift"prohibits joining a competing firm for a year after they leave mutual exchange of benefits, as when a firm buys products from its customer the buyer wants to do business with an institution…arrow_forwardLizard Lick Corporation requires all distributors of its lizard salt lick products to sell the products at specified minimum prices. This resale price maintenance agreement is not subject to antitrust law as it deals with products for animal life and the antitrust laws were implemented to protect people only. a violation of the Clayton Act. a per se violation of the Sherman Act. subject to evaluation under the rule of reason. just plain wrong and illegal on for numerous reasons.arrow_forward
- On a beautiful Saturday in October, Francie decides to take the twenty-mile ride from her home in New Jersey into New York City to do some shopping. Francie finds that Brown’s Retail Sales, Inc., has a terrific sale on televisions and decides to surprise her husband with a new high-definition television. She purchases the set from Brown’s on her VISA card for $1,450. When the set is delivered, Francie discovers that it does not work. Brown’s refuses to repair or replace it or to credit Francie’s account. Francie therefore refuses to pay VISA for the television. VISA brings a suit against Francie. Will VISA prevail? Why or why not?arrow_forward1.A retired businessman who owned a track of land was approached by a real estate agent, who is interested to buy his land. The purchase price offered by the agent was above the prevailing fair market value (FMV). The agent wants to develop the land into a commercial area and sell it to the public. The agent discussed the terms and conditions of the deed of sale in detail to the businessman, and the businessman agreed to the deal. Last year, the businessman was diagnosed of dementia by his family doctor, and the agent though was aware of it. Was a contract of sale formed? If yes, is it enforceable? Please state your reasons. 2. Jacky invited her friend, Lourdes, to her house. Lourdes has a beautiful sport car and Jacky is interested and offered to purchase it at a prevail market price or FMV, but Lourdes rejected her offer. Jacky offered Lourdes a bottled of vodka. When Lourdes consumed so much of it, she feels dizziness. Jacky took advantage and offered again to purchase her sport…arrow_forwardTrue or False 1. Natural rights are the rights that nature teaches each man that he has according to the law of nature. 2. Physical privacy refers to privacy with respect to a person’s inner life. 3. Manipulation of supply is related to price setting; when oligopolistic industries recognize one firm as the firm that sets the price, that firm is the price leader.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education