Concept explainers
Case summary: A person CM held a life estate in the city N, however, he did not pay taxes and premiums that resulted in tax liens. On the termination of the life estate, the title was transferred to the company MORC. MORC paid the premiums and liens to avoid foreclosure and sale of the property. The company MORC filed a suit against the person CM on the ground of unjust enrichment and to recover the cost of premium and tax liens.
To find: The reason for which the owner of a life estate refused to pay the taxes and premiums
Case summary: A person CM held a life estate in the city N, however, he did not pay taxes and premiums that resulted in tax liens. On the termination of the life estate, the title was transferred to the company, MORC. MORC paid the premiums and liens to avoid foreclosure and sale of the property. The company MORC filed a suit against the person CM on the ground of unjust enrichment and to recover the cost of premium and tax liens.
To find: The reason from the person CM that could influence the decision of the court.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 26 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
- A client is transferring their estate to their daughter. They aren't charging their daughter any money for the estate (what a deal!) and are unsure what to put in the deed as consideration. You advise them that consideration: must be equal to the appraised value of the property can be "love and affection," and will be conveyed using a gift deed must be explicitly specified, down to the penny, on the deed must be money, but doesn't have to be a lot of moneyarrow_forwardHow many of the following are not a "tax" death benefits dependant of a deceased person: the deceased person’s spouse the deceased person’s former spouse the deceased person’s child under 18 years of age any person with whom the deceased person had an “interdependency relationship” just before he or she died; and any person who was financially dependent on the deceased just before the deceased person died? 0 1 2 3 4 5arrow_forwardYour insured lives in an apartment but takes a temporary position in another city and must store some me for fur ture items in a storage ware apartment is sublet to a friend. Subsequently, the warehouse is broken into and some of your Insured's furniture is stolen. What Would a Tenant © A) The actual cash value or replacement cost of the property stolen less the policy deductible, subject to the 10% limitation on property temporanlite O B Nothing. The loss is not covered © C The actual cash value or replacement cost of all the personal property stolen, less the policy deductble, subject to the polis limit © D That proportion of the loss which the value of the property at the warehouse bears to the total value of all of his her personal propertyarrow_forward
- How did the court evaluate the Prewitt v Numismatic Funding Corporation case?arrow_forwardNon-forfeiture provisions are included in whole life and endowment policies to assure the policyowner that certain minimum policy benefits shall remain with him even under certain changed conditions. Non-forfeiture values guarantee to the policyowner that A) No death claim will be denied for any misstatement on the application B) Any guaranteed policy values will belong to the policy owner even if premium payments are discounted The face amount of the policy will remain the same even if the insured's health becomes impaired The premium on the policy will remain the same even when another beneficiary D) is added to the policyarrow_forwardJanelle acquires a used seven-year class asset on November 3, 2020, for $40,000. She does not elect to expense any of the asset under § 179 or straight-line cost recovery. No election for additional depreciation is made. She sells the asset on December 4, 2021. This is the only asset she acquires in 2019. Determine Janelle’s cost recovery depreciation in 2020 and 2021.arrow_forward
- 19) The Elle Corporation manufactures fingernail polish. Suzy buys a container of Elle's fingernail polish, applies it to her nails, and suffers a severe allergic reaction. She sues Elle under the implied warranty of merchantability, The test for determining whether Suzy will recover is whether: A) the nail polish she bought was suitable for the needs of the average consumer. B) the nail polish she bought properly performed its function of coloring one's nails. C) such a reaction in an appreciable number of consumers was reasonably foreseeable. D) the ingredient causing the reaction was foreign to the nail polish or natural to it. nating one model, Bobby noticesarrow_forwardWhat are the legal requirements for a valid and enforceable deed for the transfer of real property?arrow_forwardMary Decker is suing the manufacturer of her car becauseof a defect that she believes caused her to have an accident, and kept her out of work for a year. She is suing the com-pany for $3.5 million. The company has offered her a set-tlement of $700,000, of which Mary would receive $600,000 after attorneys’ fees. Her attorney has advisedher that she has a 50% chance of winning her case. If sheloses she will incur attorneys’ fees and court costs of $75,000. If she wins she is not guaranteed her full re-quested settlement. Her attorney believes that there is a 50% chance she could receive the full settlement, in whichcase Mary would get $2 million after her attorney takes hiscut, and a 50% chance that the jury will award her a lesseramount of $1,000,000, of which Mary would get $500,000.Using decision-tree analysis, decide if Mary should suethe manufacturer.arrow_forward
- one y Jason just closed on the purchase of real estate under an installment sales contract. Which of the following accurately describes Jason's present status? Jason acquires equitable title for now but can NOT take possession while paying off the loan. Jason acquires legal title immediately and can take possession while paying off the loan. Jason acquires equitable title for how and can take possession while paying off the loan. Jason acquires stocks in the corporation that owns the property.arrow_forward3. With respect to foreclosure, give the reason you agree or disagree with the statements below: a. A foreclosure sale eliminates the outstanding debt(s) of the individual being foreclosed. b. Proceeds of a foreclosure sale are distributed to those holding a lien on the property on the basis of the percentage of total debt each is owed. c. Foreclosure means the senior mortgage loan lender automatically takes ownership of the property.arrow_forwardSkip and Jack are the shareholders of the Blue Fish Event Corporation. Skip and Jack regularly put on classy events on or near the beach, so they have a special insurance policy to protect their assets. Business has been slow as fewer large beach weddings are taking place, so Skip and Jack use a large fan to blow down and damage most of their décor assets, some of which were personal assets of Skip and Jack, to collect the insurance benefits. (a) Assuming their acts are proven, will a court allow Skip and Jack to recover the insurance money? (b) Is this a situation where the corporate veil may be pierced? Why or why not? (c) What would it mean for Skip and Jack if the corporate veil is pierced in this situation?arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education