Case summary: An animal espousing organization FA filed a suit against killing and capturing of migratory birds at an International Airport. Authority PA operates the airport and had obtained a permit from the government agency FW. The permit allowed the authority PA to kill or capture specific birds to prevent the occurring of mishaps due to collisions of the birds with the aircraft. The organization FA protested against the issue of the permit to the airport authority.
To find: The regulation which is at issue in this particular case.
Case summary: An animal espousing organization FA filed a suit against killing and capturing of migratory birds at an International Airport. The authority PA operating the airport had obtained a permit from the government agency FW. The permit allowed the authority PA to kill or capture specific birds to prevent the occurring of mishaps due to collisions of the birds with the aircraft. The organization FA protested against the issue of the permit to the airport authority.
To find: The rule of statutory interpretation that was applied by the court to explain the regulation.
Case summary: An animal espousing organization FA filed a suit against killing and capturing of migratory birds at an International Airport. The authority PA operating the airport had obtained a permit from the government agency FW. The permit allowed the authority PA to kill or capture specific birds to prevent the occurring of mishaps due to collisions of the birds with the aircraft. The organization FA protested against the issue of the permit to the airport authority.
To find: The manner in which the plaintiff wanted the regulation to be interpreted and the response of court to it.
Case summary: An animal espousing organization FA filed a suit against killing and capturing of migratory birds at an International Airport. The authority PA operating the airport had obtained a permit from the government agency FW. The permit allowed the authority PA to kill or capture specific birds to prevent the occurring of mishaps due to collisions of the birds with the aircraft. The organization FA protested against the issue of the permit to the airport authority.
To find: The outcome of the interpretation of the court on the regulation.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 25 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
- what was the issue that court trying to find 22.2 ( Genesis Health Clubs, Inc. v. LED Solar and light co)arrow_forwardA) Under what circumstances might a court have committed the cellophane fallacy? B) In the Google Shopping case, Google was found to have abused its dominant position under Art 102 TFEU. On what grounds did the courts find Google guilty?C) In the Microsoft case, Microsoft was found to have committed an offence under 102 TFEU. What was the offence, and why is it a problem for Microsoft and not for other competitors.D) Suppose a firm can produce for a marginal cost of 2 and receive a price of 4. What would the elasticity of demand for its product be?arrow_forwardAn example of a legal object may be : a) an idea you have for a new business venture B) a 21-year old male person C) all natural and juristic persons D) all the abovearrow_forward
- 1. How does a persuasive precedent differ from a binding precedent and are courts always bound by such precedents? a. What are the three main methods in which the doctrine of precedent operates within a legal system?arrow_forwarddo some basic research into a case that is before the U.S. Supreme Court right now: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, and respond to the following question:Who are the parties in the case?arrow_forward1. Regarding the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the following statement is true: The act limits its scope to protection with no recovery plans for the species it protects. The act does not allow courts or regulators to take economic factors into consideration in applying its provisions. The act was passed in the year 1952 under the guidelines given by the panel on the Council on Environmental Quality. The act has its scope limited to private businesses. The act provides for exemptions that are applicable to private activities for certain important federal projects. 2. Under the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) quasi-judicial power, it has the right to regulate the various stock exchanges. appoint commissioners. conduct investigations. create legislation relating to federal securities laws.…arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education