Concept explainers
Explain how astrobiology is a science and not a pseudoscience. (Hint: Refer back to Chapter 2 for the definition of pseudoscience.)
The explanation for astrobiology is a science and not a pseudoscience.
Answer to Problem 1RQ
The astrobiology is a science and not a pseudoscience as astrobiology is based on the study of life on other worlds thereby based on scientific facts and reasoning.
Explanation of Solution
Pseudoscience is a theory or approach that is based on the assumption that it has been derived from scientific facts and methods. This approach is not based on any scientific explanation or reasons.
Astrobiology is a field of study of origin and evolution of life on Earth and on other worlds.
This field of study depends on specific calculations and reasoning. This field deals with study of the existence of life on other worlds.
Therefore, the astrobiology is a science and not a pseudoscience as astrobiology is based on the study of life on other worlds thereby based on scientific facts and reasoning.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 25 Solutions
Mindtap Astronomy, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card For Seeds/backman's Foundations Of Astronomy, 14th
- What are the advantages to using radio waves for communication between civilizations that live around different stars? List as many as you can.arrow_forwardWhy are we limited to finding life on planets orbiting other stars to situations where the biosphere has created planet-scale changes?arrow_forwardWhich of the following seems least reasonable regarding life on Earth? Group of answer choices There is much scientific evidence suggesting that all creatures living on Earth today appear to have evolved from a common ancestor. Louis Pasteur discredited the concept of spontaneous generation by demonstrating that even bacteria and other microorganisms arise from parents resembling themselves. There is ample physical evidence that the earliest life forms on Earth were multicellular creatures, perhaps resembling some of our primitive fish. When the earth formed some 4.6 billion years ago, it was a lifeless, inhospitable place. Before the mid-17th century, most people believed that God had created humankind and other higher organisms and that insects, frogs, and other small creatures could arise spontaneously in mud or decaying matter About billion years into its development, the Earth it was teeming with organisms resembling blue-green algae.arrow_forward
- what would happen to a life-form if the information handed down to offspring was always the same? how would that endanger the future of the life-form?arrow_forwardGive me right solution. Last time I was recieved wrong solution.. please read the question carefully and give me answer according to the questionarrow_forwardWhat are two characteristic properties of life that distinguish it from nonliving things?arrow_forward
- Water is life. Nothing survives without water. Water is abundant everywhere. Now, we said before that water contains the primary components of good fuel. The hydrogen. Is there is a possibility that water will be a source of Hydrogen? Or we mean, we can subject water in a certain process and we are deriving Hydrogen from it continuously? If yes, how?arrow_forwardSee the screenshot uploaded. Answer in a step-by-step format, add diagrams, and detailed side notes for a better understanding. For a more clear response please answer on paper Thank you!arrow_forward
- Foundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399920Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage LearningStars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399944Author:Michael A. SeedsPublisher:Cengage Learning
- AstronomyPhysicsISBN:9781938168284Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. WolffPublisher:OpenStaxHorizons: Exploring the Universe (MindTap Course ...PhysicsISBN:9781305960961Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage Learning