The income inequality in the US.
Explanation of Solution
Table -1 shows the distribution of US income by households in 2008:
Table -1
Personal Income Category | Percentage of all households in this category |
Under $10,000 | 7.1 |
$10,000-$14,999 | 5.8 |
$15,000-$24,999 | 11.8 |
$25,000-$34,999 | 10.9 |
$35,000-$49,999 | 14.0 |
$50,000-$99,999 | 17.9 |
$100,000 and above | 11.9 |
20.5 | |
100.0 |
As per table -1, the highest 20% have received an income share of 50% in 2008. This is ten times more than the 3.4% than the lowest 20% received. The three quintiles in the middle get less that 50% of the total income before tax. When we combine the bottom three quintiles on top of two quintiles that receive almost twice of them. So, the fact is that the top to 20% are receiving as much as 80% at the bottom.
The government's effect on the income distribution happens through taxes and transfer payments. It has a slightly progressive effect of federal, state, and local taxes on distribution of income as people with a high income have a pay of a higher percentage of their income in taxes when compared to people with a lower income. The main contribution of the government for income equality happens through transfer programs i.e. 80% of the times. The benefit of this contribution goes mainly to people in the lowest quintile where 75% of the income that these people earn is through government transfer payments.
Though these statistics may suggest that the government is contributing heavily to equalize the income, it might be all correct. As the transfer programs provided to people with a lower income decrease the incentive to work so the income earned will be further down. Also, not all these transfer programs got to the poor. For example, in case of subsidies, farming always goes to the farmers that are wealthy. Middle and higher class students get the benefit of education funding by the government than the ones with a lower income.
Concept Introduction:
Income inequality: It is the unequal distribution of a household or an individual income across the various participants in an economy.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 23 Solutions
Economics (Irwin Economics)
- Explain how a country may experience greater equality in the distribution of income, yet still experience high rates of poverty. Hint: Look at the Clear It Up 'How do governments measure poverty in low-income countries?' and compare to Table 15.5.arrow_forward-Suppose Country A and Country B have the followingpopulation and income distributions: Draw a Lorenz Curve for each country. Additionally, comment on which country ismore unequal.arrow_forward. Consider two communities. In one community,ten families have incomes of $100,000 each and tenfamilies have incomes of $20,000 each. In the othercommunity, ten families have incomes of $250,000each and ten families have incomes of $25,000 each.a. In which community is the distribution of incomemore unequal? In which community is theproblem of poverty likely to be worse?b. Which distribution of income would Rawls prefer?Explain.c. Which distribution of income do you prefer?Explain.d. Why might someone have the oppositepreference?arrow_forward
- The following table summarizes the income distribution for the town of Perkopia, which has a population of 10,000 people. Every individual within an income group earns the same income, and the total annual income in the economy is $500,000,000. Suppose that in 2016, the poverty income threshold, or poverty line, is set at an annual income of $43,275 for an individual. Year Share of Total Income in Perkopia (Percent) Lowest Quintile Second Quintile Middle Quintile Fourth Quintile Highest Quintile 2006 3.0 7.6 14.0 21.7 53.7 2010 3.3 9.0 14.7 22.4 50.6 2016 3.9 9.5 15.0 22.7 48.9 2020 5.0 10.0 16.0 24.0 45.0 The data in the table suggest that there was income inequality from 2006 to 2020. Complete the following table to help you determine the poverty line in Perkopia in 2016. To do this, begin by determining the total income of all individuals in each quintile, using the fact that total annual income in the economy is $500,000,000.…arrow_forward[1] Consider an income distribution S: (10, 20, 30, 50, 100). Suppose it is divided into two groups, group A: (10, 30, 50) and group B: (20, 100). Let the poverty line be 30. (a) Show that for both Headcount and Poverty Gap, the weighted sum of poverty for group A and group B is the same as the overall poverty in S. (b) Now consider a relative poverty line which is 60 percent of the median income for each group. Will the decomposition rule still hold? Explain.arrow_forwardSuppose George made $20,000 last year and that he lives in the country of Harmony. The way Harmony levies income taxes, each citizen must pay 10 percent in taxes on their first $10,000 in earnings and then 50 percent in taxes on anything else they might earn. So given that George earned $20,000 last year, his marginal tax rate on the last dollar he earns will be __________ and his average tax rate for his entire income will be _________________. a. 50 percent; 50 percent. b. 50 percent; less than 50 percent. c. 10 percent; 50 percent. d. 10 percent; less than 50 percent.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax