The FTC was entrusted with the duty to adjudicate the matters relating to advertisement and fair trade practices. The FTC was entrusted with the duty for decades. The FTC started making rules which distinguished between fair and unfair trade practices.In the due process right of participants was limited in cases of violation of these rules. The process did not include the stage of cross-examination. The person who is booked for violating the rules will be given full adjudication but the legitimacy of the rule cannot be challenged in any case. It was more certain that the party charged with the violation of such rules will be adjudicated. The challenge against the new rules was filed in the court on the ground of limiting the rights of parties. To find: The factors that are responsible for upholding the rule.

Question

In 1992 the state of California charged Sears Auto Centers with overcharging customers for unneeded or unperformed repairs. Sears agreed to a settlement that could cost as much as $20 million. Sears had compensated its salespeople with commissions based on total sales. Following the settlement, Sears dropped the commissions and went to a straight salary. Sears recently indicated that it is planning to reinstate commissions for salespeople in their Auto Centers. It even plans on paying commissions for selling customers brake jobs and wheel alignments. These two products were the core of the 1992 scandal. Sears says that it has taken steps to prevent a recurrence of past problems. In particular, the decision right to recommend repairs is granted to mechanics who are paid a straight salary. Sales consultants are paid commissions for selling repair services but are not authorized to recommend repairs. Under the old system that caused problems, these individuals diagnosed repair…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 23, Problem 1BS

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The FTC was entrusted with the duty to adjudicate the matters relating to advertisement and fair trade practices. The FTC was entrusted with the duty for decades. The FTC started making rules which distinguished between fair and unfair trade practices.In the due process right of participants was limited in cases of violation of these rules. The process did not include the stage of cross-examination. The person who is booked for violating the rules will be given full adjudication but the legitimacy of the rule cannot be challenged in any case. It was more certain that the party charged with the violation of such rules will be adjudicated. The challenge against the new rules was filed in the court on the ground of limiting the rights of parties.

To find:The factors that are responsible for upholding the rule.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

In 1992 the state of California charged Sears Auto Centers with overcharging customers for unneeded or unperformed repairs. Sears agreed to a settlement that could cost as much as $20 million. Sears had compensated its salespeople with commissions based on total sales. Following the settlement, Sears dropped the commissions and went to a straight salary. Sears recently indicated that it is planning to reinstate commissions for salespeople in their Auto Centers. It even plans on paying commissions for selling customers brake jobs and wheel alignments. These two products were the core of the 1992 scandal. Sears says that it has taken steps to prevent a recurrence of past problems. In particular, the decision right to recommend repairs is granted to mechanics who are paid a straight salary. Sales consultants are paid commissions for selling repair services but are not authorized to recommend repairs. Under the old system that caused problems, these individuals diagnosed repair…

the major federal legislation in Canada that defines illegal practices, including price fixing, bid rigging, price discrimination, predatory pricing, double ticketing, resale price maintenance, bait and switch selling, and pyramid selling occurs when false or deceptive comparisons or distorted claims are made concerning a competitor's product, services, or property comprise principle and standards that guide behaviour in the world of business may be incurred when an unfair and untrue statement is made about a competitor in writing the statement becomes actionable when it is communicated to a third party and can be interpreted as damaging the company the foundation for partnering-style relationship, product, customer, and presentation strategies an attempt to influence the person receiving the "gift"prohibits joining a competing firm for a year after they leave mutual exchange of benefits, as when a firm buys products from its customer the buyer wants to do business with an institution…

The National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. §§ 4301-06, exempts certain joint research, development and production activities from the per se rule of antitrust liability, and from the automatic award of attorneys’ fees to a plaintiff who successfully challenges such activities under the antitrust laws. For parties that notify the antitrust agencies of their intent to engage in such activities, it also requires “detrebling” – successful antitrust plaintiffs are entitled only to single damages. Do you support this legislation? Why or why not? Would you support extending these same protections to all competitive conduct that is subject to the US antitrust laws? Which categories of conduct would you include or exclude from such protection? Explain your reasoning.