The Cosmic Perspective (9th Edition)
9th Edition
ISBN: 9780134874364
Author: Jeffrey O. Bennett, Megan O. Donahue, Nicholas Schneider, Mark Voit
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 22, Problem 46EAP
To determine
To explain:The era nucleosynthesis and the reason it is impossible to observe.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
The Milky Way grew through merging with many smaller galaxies. What are the observational signatures of this process?
O The motion of old stars in the bulge and halo of our galaxy are randomly orientated, meaning they were formed from collisions of small,
accreted, galaxies all on different paths.
O The ordered motion of the bulge / halo stars means that they came from many objects.
The random motions of stars in the disk means it was formed from collisions of small, accreted, galaxies.
O The motion of young stars in the disk are all in the same direction, meaning they came in as seperate objects.
Explain the Higher-Order Systems?
What is cosmic infalation ? Explain it.
Chapter 22 Solutions
The Cosmic Perspective (9th Edition)
Ch. 22 - Prob. 1VSCCh. 22 - Prob. 2VSCCh. 22 - Prob. 3VSCCh. 22 - Explain what we mean by the Big Bang theory.Ch. 22 - Prob. 2EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 3EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 4EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 5EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 6EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 7EAP
Ch. 22 - 8. Why do we think there was slightly more matter...Ch. 22 - 9. How long did the era of nucleosynthesis last?...Ch. 22 - 10. When we observe the cosmic microwave...Ch. 22 - 11. Briefly describe how the cosmic microwave...Ch. 22 - 12. How does the chemical abundance of helium in...Ch. 22 - Prob. 13EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 14EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 15EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 16EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 17EAPCh. 22 - Decide whether the statement makes sense (or is...Ch. 22 - Prob. 19EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 20EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 21EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 22EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 23EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 24EAPCh. 22 - Decide whether the statement makes sense (or is...Ch. 22 - Choose the best answer to each of the following....Ch. 22 - Prob. 27EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 28EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 29EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 30EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 31EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 32EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 33EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 34EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 35EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 37EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 38EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 41EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 42EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 43EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 44EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 45EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 46EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 47EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 48EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 49EAPCh. 22 - Gravity vs. the Electromagnetic Force. The amount...Ch. 22 - Prob. 51EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 52EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 53EAPCh. 22 - Prob. 54EAPCh. 22 - Daytime at “Night.” According to Olbers’ paradox,...
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Would a human have been possible during the first generation of stars that formed right after the Big Bang? Why or why not?arrow_forwardSuppose astronomers discover a radio message from a civilization whose planet orbits a star 35 lightyears away. Their message encourages us to send a radio answer, which we decide to do. Suppose our governing bodies take 2 years to decide whether and how to answer. When our answer arrives there, their governing bodies also take two of our years to frame an answer to us. How long after we get their first message can we hope to get their reply to ours? (A question for further thinking: Once communication gets going, should we continue to wait for a reply before we send the next message?)arrow_forwardHubble's First Attempt. Edwin Hubble's first attempt to measure the universe's expansion rate was flawed because the standard candles he was using were not properly calibrated. Look at (Figure 1) a.Estimate the value of Ho corresponding to the solid line in the figure. Express your answer kilometers per second per million light-years to two significant figures. b.What is the approximate age of the universe indicated by that erroneous value of Ho? Express your answer in years to one significant figure.arrow_forward
- Considering the reactions in primordial nucleosynthesis only, what would be the impact on the universe today if the neutron lifetime were much smaller than 886s (the actual value of the neutron lifetime)? Select one: O a. Annihilations mean that the universe is left composed entirely of photons and neutrinos O b. There would be no difference to the actual universe O c. Only hydrogen atoms would be present today O d. There would be very small amounts of 4He in the universe todayarrow_forwardState three pieces of evidence that support the idea that the Universe began in a hot Big Bang, and explain how each piece of evidence supports the hot Big Bang model. Describe the ob- servational evidence that supports the idea that the Universe is pervaded by Dark Energy, and explain why each piece of evidence you cite supports the Dark Energy model.arrow_forwardConsider three periods in the history of the Universe: one million years after the Big Bang (age = 1 million years), about five billion years ago (age = 9 billion years), and today. What is the ranking in the expansion rate of the Universe in these three period, from fastest to slowest expansion: O 1 million years, today, 9 billion years. today, 1 million years, 9 billion years. today, 9 billion years, 1 million years. O 1 million years, 9 billion years, today.arrow_forward
- Hubble's law. Hubble found that distant galaxies are receding with a velocity proportional to their distance from where we are on Earth. For the ith Galaxy, vi=H0ri With us at the origin. Show that this recession of the galaxies from us does not imply that we are at the center of the universe. Specifically, take the Galaxy at r1 as a New origin and show that Hubble's law is still obeyed.arrow_forward38. The Cosmic Microwave Background is remarkable in many ways. Let's illustrate this by personalizing the CMB a bit. a) Imagine that the Earth is a sphere with a radius equal to its actual equatorial radius (The radius of Earth at the equator is 3,963 miles (6,378 kilometers). If the radius of the Earth is assumed to be constant to the same level of uniformity as the temperature fluctuations of the CMB—that is, to one part in 100,000—then how high would the highest mountains be relative to the mean surface radius of the Earth? b) Calculate the ratio of the age of the Universe when the CMB was created and the age of the Universe today (in late 2021). If a person is 20 years old, What was their age relative to their current age adopting that fraction? Give the result in hours.arrow_forwardI'm doing a debate about Kalam cosmological. I need to have an example of something out of nothing (Or maybe we can't prove the cause)? Can you help give 5 modern physics example?arrow_forward
- Most of the stars we can see with the unaided eye in our night sky are hundreds or even thousands of lightyears away from Earth. (The very closest ones are only a few dozen lightyears away, but most are much further.) The vast majority of stars in our galaxy are many tens of thousands of lightyears away. IF intelligent life existed on planets orbiting some of these stars – and that’s a huge IF! – comment on the likelihood and practicality of (a) visiting, (b) communicating with, or (c) verifying the existence of those life forms. Describe how you might go about approaching EACH of these three tasks, or if you think they are even possible. (One or two sentences for each part would be appropriate.)arrow_forwardThe matter density in the Universe today is Pm = -27 kg m-3. What would 2.7 x 10 be the value of the density parameter, 2o, if the Hubble constant had the value Ho = 38 km/s/Mpc? Assume the Universe does not contain dark energy and choose the option below that best matches your answer. Select one: O a. 0.1 O b. 2. О с. 1. O d. 0.7 О е. 0.5arrow_forwardDescribe what is meant by Olbers’ paradox. Explain how it is solved by our modern understanding of the Universe.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Foundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399920Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage LearningStars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399944Author:Michael A. SeedsPublisher:Cengage LearningAstronomyPhysicsISBN:9781938168284Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. WolffPublisher:OpenStax
Foundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)
Physics
ISBN:9781337399920
Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana Backman
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Stars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)
Physics
ISBN:9781337399944
Author:Michael A. Seeds
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Astronomy
Physics
ISBN:9781938168284
Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. Wolff
Publisher:OpenStax