(a)
Case summary:Publisher B, an LLC, situated in Ohio, opened a bank account with printing company G. Person L, a member-manager of B, signed a credit agreement with G that identified him as a purchaser and the agreement stated that the payment would be required within 30 days. In spite of the agreement, B took 6 months for the settlement of the payment. G agreed, after refusal, to take new orders only after the assurance of payment. L signed a promissory note payable to G along with a 6
To find:The circumstances in which a member of an LLC is liable for the debt of the firm.
Case summary: Publisher B, an LLC, situated in Ohio, opened a bank account with printing company G. Person L, a member-manager of B, signed a credit agreement with G that identified him as a purchaser and the agreement stated that the payment would be required within 30 days. In spite of the agreement, B took 6 months for the settlement of the payment. G agreed, after refusal, to take new orders only after the assurance of payment. L signed a promissory note payable to G along with a 6
To find:The liability of the person L for the unpaid amount of the publisher B under the credit agreement.
Case summary:Publisher B, an LLC, situated in Ohio, opened a bank account with a printing company G. Person L, a member-manager of B, signed a credit agreement with G that identified him as a purchaser, and the agreement stated that the payment would be required within 30 days. In spite of the agreement, B took 6 months for the settlement of the payment. G agreed, after refusal, to take new orders only after the assurance of payment. L signed a promissory note payable to G along with a 6
To find:The effect of the promissory note of person L on the liability of parties on the account.
(b)
Case summary:Publisher B, an LLC, situated in Ohio, opened a bank account with a printing company G. Person L, a member-manager of B, signed a credit agreement with G that identified him as a purchaser and the agreement stated that the payment would be required within 30 days. In spite of the agreement, B took 6 months for the settlement of the payment. G agreed, after refusal, to take new orders only after the assurance of payment. L signed a promissory note payable to G along with a 6
To f ind: The ethical responsibility of the members of an LLC to meet the obligations of the firm.
(c)
Case s ummary: Publisher B, an LLC, situated in Ohio, opened a bank account with a printing company G. The person L, a member-manager of B, signed a credit agreement with G that identified him as a purchaser and the agreement stated that the payment would be required within 30 days. In spite of the agreement, B took 6 months for the settlement of the payment. G agreed, after refusal, to take new orders only after the assurance of payment. L signed a promissory note payable to G along with a 6
To f ind: The legal duty of person L to mitigate the damage by the sale or distribution of the copies.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 17 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
- On a beautiful Saturday in October, Francie decides to take the twenty-mile ride from her home in New Jersey into New York City to do some shopping. Francie finds that Brown’s Retail Sales, Inc., has a terrific sale on televisions and decides to surprise her husband with a new high-definition television. She purchases the set from Brown’s on her VISA card for $1,450. When the set is delivered, Francie discovers that it does not work. Brown’s refuses to repair or replace it or to credit Francie’s account. Francie therefore refuses to pay VISA for the television. VISA brings a suit against Francie. Will VISA prevail? Why or why not?arrow_forwardNew West Fruit Corporation (New West) and Coastal Berry Corporation are both brokers of fresh strawberries. In the second half of 2012, New West’s predecessor, Monc’s Consolidated Produce, Inc., loaned money and strawberry plants to a group of strawberry growers known as Cooperativa La Paz (La Paz). In September 2012, Monc’s and La Paz signed a “Sales and Marketing Agreement” to allow Monc’s the exclusive right to market the strawberries grown by La Paz during the 2012–2014 season. The agreement did not mention the advances of money or plants, but did give Monc’s a security interest in all crops and proceeds on specified property in the 2013–2014 season. The financing statement was properly signed and filed. Monc’s closed down in January 2014, and its assets were assigned to New West. In April, New West learned that La Paz had agreed to market its 2014 crop through Coastal Berry. New West immediately arranged a meeting to advise the Coastal Berry officers of its contract with the…arrow_forwardTime Inc. offers to sell to Unlimited Sales Company one hundred digital watches at $50 a piece, subject to certain specific delivery dates. Unlimited replies with a signed purchase order that reads, “Accept your offer for 100 watches at $50 each. Must be delivered to our warehouse.” Time does not respond or deliver the goods. Unlimited files a suit for breach of contract, to which Time answers that there is no contract because Unlimited’s purchase order contained additional terms and is not signed by Time. A valid contract exists and the additional terms ("must be delivered to our warehouse") becomes part of the contract. A) True B) Falsearrow_forward
- After receiving a promotion to logistics manager, Shantil’s husband, Ashton, purchased a 2017 BMW SUV for $68,000; however, he financed $48,000 through First Florida Banc. The bank took a security interest in the vehicle. Ashton was out of town for work when Shantil found out he had been having an affair. Shantil took a baseball bat and broke the windows and put dents in the BMW. Shantil then dropped the car off at the girlfriend’s apartment. Ashton was furious. After taking the car to a body shop for repairs, Ashton was unable to pay the bill due to the divorce, so he negotiated terms with the body shop; however, the shop retained possession of the vehicle. The repair shop claimed a lien on the car for services and materials in the amount of $21,250. Ashton stopped making payments to the bank while he was trying to save money to pay off the repair. First Florida Banc claimed priority. Discuss the rights of each party and determine which party is in the best position to prevailarrow_forward13) When husband and wife live together, the law implies that the wife is authorized to use her husband's credit for necessaries suited to their style of living. Based on the above situation, the husband is an agent and the wife is a principal. a) True b) False 14) The person who gave assistance in agency relationship is known as agent. a) True b) False 15) The governing law for contract of sales is Sale of Goods Act 1957. a) True b) False 16) Goods means every kind of immovable property other than actionable claims and money. a) True b) False 17) Faiz meets Farhan, a car dealer and tells him that he wants a car that can move 20km/liter Farhan promotes one of the cars in the showroom and says that it suits the purpose. Faiz buys the car by relying on Farhan's representation. Subsequently Faiz finds that the car can move 15km/liter The above situation is an example of breach of warranty. a) True b) Falsearrow_forwardFranchising is a method of distributing products or services involving a franchisorthat establishes the brand's trademark, trade name, business system, and afranchisee who pays a royalty and an initial fee for the right to do business underthe franchisor's name and system. It is a contractual business relationship. Whatdo you think is the prime advantage and disadvantage in having a business ofthis nature?arrow_forward
- Gardner-Denver is the largest manufacturer of ratchet wrenches and their replacement parts in the United States. Gardner-Denver had two different lists of prices for its wrenches and parts. Its blue list had parts that, if purchased in quantities of five or more, were available for substantially less than its white list prices 1 - Purport 2 - Did Gardner-Denver engage in price discrimination with its two price lists? 3- Assuming that Gardner-Denver has engaged in price discrimination, what law would be violated in such situation? 4- Which agency of the federal government is responsible to investigate cases that may involve price discrimination?arrow_forwardA consumer entered into an agreement with Rent-It Corporation for the rental of a television set at a charge of $17 per week. The agreement also provides that if the renter chooses to rent the set for seventy-eight consecutive weeks, title would be transferred. The consumer now contends that the agreement was really a sales agreement, not a lease, and therefore is a credit sale subject to the Truth-in-Lending Act. Explain whether the consumer is correct.arrow_forward1. Basic Research LLC advertised its products on television networks owned by Rainbow Media Holdings Inc through an ad agency Icebox Advertising Inc. As Basic’s agent Icebox had express authority to buy ads from Rainbow on Basics behalf, but the authority was limited to buying ad with cash in advance. Despite this limit Rainbow sold ads to Basic through Icebox on credit. Basic paid Icebox for the ads, but Icebox did not pass all of the payments on to Rainbow. Icebox filed for bankruptcy. Can Rainbow recoup the unpaid amounts from Basic? Explain.2. Western Fire truck Inc contracted with Emergency One Inc (EO) to be its exclusive dealer in Wyoming and Colorado through Dec. 2003. James Costello, a Western Salesperson, was authorized to order EO vehicles for hi customers. Without informing Western, Costello emailed EO about Westerns diffuclties obtaining cash to fund its operations. He asked about the viability of Westerns contract and his possible employment with EO. On EO’s…arrow_forward
- What does agency law tell us about who may sign or executed agreements for a company and who is liable when they do.arrow_forwardB. Hawkeye Bank & Trust and affiliated banks agreed to refer bank customers to Financial Marketing Services, Inc. (FMS) for the purchase of life insurance. Hawkeye and FMS shared the commissions. Hawkeye employees and some independent agents licensed through FMS made the actual sales; however, all insurance business was FMS’ property. Because of concern about the confidentiality of bank customer information, Hawkeye decided to terminate its contract with FMS and sell insurance directly to its customers. The independent agents claimed Hawkeye terminating the contract with FMS constituted intentional interference with the agents’ contracts and prospective relations. Was it? Explain your position.arrow_forwardDiscuss the provisions of the Companies Act related to the issue and buyback of shares, including the requirements for conducting buyback offers, the restrictions on buyback pricing, and the consequences of non-compliance.arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education