Loose Leaf for Principles of Taxation for Business and Investment Planning 2019 Edition
22nd Edition
ISBN: 9781260161472
Author: Sally Jones, Shelley C. Rhoades-Catanach
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Question
Chapter 17, Problem 5RP
To determine
Explain whether Person W is eligible to exclude any of the gain during the second scale.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Miguel, a 16-year old mechanic’s apprentice, borrowed $3,000 from his next door neighbour, Jono, by telling him that he was 20 years old and had a good, stable income. The loan was payable in three equal fortnightly payments. After the first payment, Miguel stopped paying Jono. Jono wanted to bring a legal action against Miguel but when he discovered his real age, he decided instead to initiate an action in tort for deceit against the latter.
Will Jono likely be successful in his action in tort for deceit against Miguel? Explain your answer. (Maximum 400 words)
Suhana is the trustee of gina's bankrupt estate. Gina owns a boutique business which operates from rented premises in a local shopping centre. The business itself is successful. The petitioner's debt is not business related. Gina is a qualified engineer and if she were to give up the shop she could earn $ 130,000 p.a as an employee . Gina is single and has no dependents. Gina owns an apartment which is worth $ 5,00,000 secured to town bank. The outstanding mortgage is $ 3,30,000. The petitioner's debt is $ 80,000. Additional unsecured debts for the business are approximately $ 30,000. Gina has a personal credit card debt of $ 10,000. Gina leases a car. She owns furniture, clothes, jewelry, a musical instrument and other personal assets. Gina also has $ 2,00,000 in a supwr annuation fund. Unfair preferences were paid to six creditors prior to the presentation of the creditors petition which totalled $ 43,00.
Required: assume you are suhana in a roughly chronological order . What…
Louisa, worried about her cousin Garth’s dangerous obesity and seeming addiction to Power Up! promises to pay Garth, $10,000 if Garth stops drinking Power Up! and loses 100 pounds within the next two years. Garth agrees, performs his part of the bargain, and asks for the money. Louisa refuses to pay, saying that she forgot about the deal, but that even if she did make such a pledge, there was no valid consideration for it. Garth files a suit against Louisa. In whose favor is the court likely to rule, and why?
Chapter 17 Solutions
Loose Leaf for Principles of Taxation for Business and Investment Planning 2019 Edition
Ch. 17 - Prob. 1QPDCh. 17 - Discuss the tax policy reasons why gifts and...Ch. 17 - In what way does the tax law give preferential...Ch. 17 - Prob. 4QPDCh. 17 - A basic principle of federal tax law is that a...Ch. 17 - Prob. 6QPDCh. 17 - If an individual purchases property insurance on...Ch. 17 - Prob. 8QPDCh. 17 - Prob. 9QPDCh. 17 - Prob. 10QPD
Ch. 17 - Prob. 11QPDCh. 17 - Prob. 12QPDCh. 17 - Prob. 1APCh. 17 - Prob. 2APCh. 17 - Prob. 3APCh. 17 - Prob. 4APCh. 17 - Prob. 5APCh. 17 - Prob. 6APCh. 17 - Prob. 7APCh. 17 - Prob. 8APCh. 17 - Prob. 9APCh. 17 - Prob. 10APCh. 17 - Prob. 11APCh. 17 - Prob. 12APCh. 17 - Prob. 13APCh. 17 - Prob. 14APCh. 17 - Prob. 15APCh. 17 - Prob. 16APCh. 17 - Prob. 17APCh. 17 - Prob. 18APCh. 17 - Prob. 19APCh. 17 - Prob. 20APCh. 17 - Prob. 21APCh. 17 - Prob. 22APCh. 17 - Prob. 23APCh. 17 - Prob. 24APCh. 17 - Prob. 25APCh. 17 - Prob. 26APCh. 17 - Prob. 27APCh. 17 - Prob. 28APCh. 17 - Prob. 29APCh. 17 - Prob. 30APCh. 17 - Prob. 31APCh. 17 - Prob. 32APCh. 17 - Prob. 33APCh. 17 - Prob. 1IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 2IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 3IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 4IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 5IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 6IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 7IRPCh. 17 - Mrs. Newton, who is a self-employed author, paid...Ch. 17 - Prob. 9IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 10IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 11IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 12IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 13IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 14IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 15IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 16IRPCh. 17 - Prob. 1RPCh. 17 - Prob. 2RPCh. 17 - Prob. 3RPCh. 17 - Prob. 4RPCh. 17 - Prob. 5RPCh. 17 - Prob. 1TPCCh. 17 - Prob. 2TPCCh. 17 - Prob. 3TPCCh. 17 - Prob. 1CPCh. 17 - Prob. 2CPCh. 17 - Prob. 3CP
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Mrs. Cora Yank (age 42) is divorced and has full custody of her 10-year-old son, William. Mrs. Yank works as a medical technician in a Chicago hospital. Her salary was $38,400, from which her employer withheld $1,045 federal income tax and $2,938 employee FICA tax. Several years ago, Mrs. Yank was seriously injured in a traffic accident caused by another driver’s negligence. This year, she received a $25,000 settlement from the driver’s insurance company: $20,000 as compensation for her physical injuries and $5,000 for lost wages during her convalescent period. Because she was unable to work for the first seven weeks of the year, she collected $1,400 unemployment compensation from the state of Illinois. Mrs. Yank earned $629 interest on a savings account. She contributed $800 to a traditional IRA. She is not an active participant in any other qualified retirement plan. Mrs. Yank paid $10,800 rent on the apartment in which she and William live. She received $1,600 alimony and $2,350…arrow_forwardPam is separated from her husband, Ted. Ted moved to an apartment in the same city two years ago, but they have not finalized their divorce yet. They live in a common law state. They have one daughter, Rainey, who is eight years old and lives with Pam most of the time. She spends every other weekend and usually one week night with her father. Ted works for XYZ International. He earned a salary of $96,000 for the current year. His salary was his only source of income. Pam works for ABC Corp. as an accountant. Her salary for the current year was $88,000. ABC is a great place to work. Pam’s health insurance (valued at $4,800 per year) and $6,000 in childcare benefits are provided by ABC Corp. She even received a Christmas bonus of $2,500 in addition to her salary. She held on to the check until January when she cashed it to use on a ski vacation for her and Rainey. Pam slipped and fell at work. She had to undergo surgery on her ankle. She received worker’s compensation benefits…arrow_forwardTyrell has a tax service and accounting business in Redwood City. He decides to move to Center City, which is 150 miles away and sells his accounting practice to Able and Baker, a CPA firm. In the sales contract, he agrees that he will refrain from practicing accounting anywhere within a 20-mile radius of Redwood City for a period of two years. However, on weekends he returns to his house in Redwood City, and when clients call him, he meets with them in his home. The sales agreement: Ois being violated by Tyrell. O is invalid, because it is an illegal restraint of trade. O is illegal, because it is a violation of public policy. O will be divided into an enforceable, valid portion and an unenforceable, invalid portion, which is the time provision, because the two-year period is too long.arrow_forward
- Amanda (who is single) just sold her house and moved from Phoenix to L.A. to start a new job one year ago. At that time, she excluded $250,000 of gain on the sale of her home under Section 121. Now, her employer has decided to relocate her again from L.A. to Cincinnati. Her employer has given her the option of either relocating now or waiting until the end of next year. She would like to use Section 121 to exclude part of the gain on the sale of her new home in L.A. The home in L.A. has an adjusted basis of $230,000 (includes $10,000 of depreciation due to the home office deduction) and a FMV of $430,000. Amanda is excited because she believes she will be able to fully exclude her entire gain from her taxable income regardless of when she moves. Is she correct? Please explain your reasoning and what amount of gain Amanda will be required to recognize in this transaction. What would you recommend to Amanda if she wishes to optimize her Section 121 deduction?arrow_forwardIn early 2019, Cyndey Walters received a $2 million settlement as a result of suffering serious injuries in an accident on a construction site. As a result, she immediately quit her job as a plumber for a construction company and began to search for rundown houses in her neighbour hood that she could buy at a low price. Her objective was to bring her houses up to code (i.e., in accordance with building regulations) and then rent them to individuals who could not afford adequate housing. Cyndey charged just enough rent to cover the expenses of each house. By March 2020, she owned five houses that were rented to five families. She continued working part time as a plumber while she took courses toward a degree in social work. Cyndey came from a large family, many members of which were involved in construction. She called on her family for help when her tenants needed services, and they gave her a family dis- count for their services. In June 2021, she learned that the owner of two…arrow_forwardMr Choi was born and raised in Hong Kong. In recent years, due to family-related reasons, he spends most of his time in Shenzhen. Though Mr Choi has a Hong Kong Identity Card, he seldom visits Hong Kong as most of his friends and relatives are in mainland China. In July 2019, Mr Choi purchased a residential property in Tai Po for $30,000,000 for investment purpose. After a quick renovation, the property was let to Mr Chan for two years, starting from 1 September 2019. The relevant terms of tenancy agreement are extracted below: monthly rent: $30,000, payable at the beginning of each month; rent-free period of a half-month from 1 September 2019; initial premium of $48,000, payable on signing the lease agreement; rates of $6,000 per quarter, payable by Mr Choi to the government; management fees: $2,000 per month, payable by the landlord; and rental deposit: $60,000 payable on signing the lease agreement. In October 2019, the property underwent certain repairs that cost $5,000; these…arrow_forward
- Alexander is a resident of Utah, where gambling is illegal. Alexander visits Goldstrike Casino in Reno, Nevada, and loses all the money he brought with him. Frustrated with his losses and determined to win his money back, Alexander writes a check to Goldstrike drawn on his bank in Utah for $5,000 to obtain more cash so that he can keep gambling. Goldstrike also requires him to sign an agreement guaranteeing that he will repay any money advanced to him. Fortunately, Alexander’s luck turned; he walks away from Goldstrike with $35,000 in his pocket. As soon as he gets home, Alexander issues a stop payment order on the $5,000 check. If Goldstrike files suit against Alexander in Utah to collect its money: a) Goldstrike will win because the full faith and credit clause of the U.S. Constitution requires each state to honor the laws of its sister states. b) Goldstrike will lose because suits over gambling on credit cannot be enforced across state lines. c) Goldstrike…arrow_forwardSahana is the trustee of Gina’s bankrupt estate. Gina owns a boutique business which operates from rented premises in a local shopping centre. The business itself is successful. The petitioner’s debt is not business-related. Gina is a qualified engineer and if she were to give up the shop, she could earn at least $130000 p.a. as an employee. Gina is single and has no dependents. Gina owns an apartment worth $500000 which is secured to TownBank. The outstanding mortgage is $330000. The petitioner’s debt is 80000. Additional unsecured debts for the business are approximately $30000. Gina has a personal credit card debt of $10000. Gina leases a car. She owns furniture, clothes, jewellery, a musical instrument and other personal effects. Gina also has $200000 in a superannuation fund. Unfair preferences were paid to 6 creditors prior to the presentation of the Creditor’s petition which totalled $4300. Required: assume you are Suhana. In a roughly chronological order, explain what actions…arrow_forwardNoelle's diamond ring was stolen in 2017. She originally paid $15,400 for the ring, but it was worth considerably more at the time of the theft. Noelle filed an insurance claim for the stolen ring, but the claim was denied. Because the insurance claim was denied, Noelle took a casualty loss deduction for the stolen ring on her 2017 tax return. In 2017, Noelle had AGI of $77,000. After Noelle threatened legal action in early 2019, the insurance company had a "change of heart" and sent Noelle a check for $9,240 for the stolen ring. The per-event floor is $100. What is the proper tax treatment of the $9,240 Noelle received from the insurance company in 2019? Noelle should _______the amount of______.arrow_forward
- The former bookkeeper of White Electric Supply is serving time in prison for embezzlingnearly $416,000 in less than five years. She describes herself as “an ordinary mother of three kidsand a proud grandmother of four.” Like so many other “ordinary” employees, she started out bytaking only small amounts. By the time she was caught, she was stealing lump sums of $5,000and $10,000.Her method was crude and simple. She would write a check for the correct amount payable to asupplier for, say, $15,000. However, she would record in the company’s check register an amountsignificantly greater, say, $20,000. She would then write a check payable to herself for the $5,000 difference. In the check register, next to the number of each check she had deposited in her per-sonal bank account, she would write the word “void,” making it appear as though the check had been destroyed. This process went undetected for nearly five years.a. What controls must have been lacking at White Electric Supply to…arrow_forwardAt age 65, Carlota’s financial position was better than her health. She had a large balance in an IRA that she wanted to move to a different IRA. Carlota withdrew $100,000 from the IRA and planned to roll over the funds into another IRA. Unfortunately, she died before completing the rollover. Carlota’s son, Andres, discovered what his mother had done a week after her death. Andres was both executor of Carlota’s estate and beneficiary of her IRA. Can Andres, in his role as executor, complete the rollover for his deceased mother by depositing the $100,000 in another IRA within the 60-day rollover period? a. Locate the IRS pronouncement(s) that deals with this situation. State the pronouncement number(s). b. Review the IRS pronouncement(s). Does it raise a need for new information to solve this question? c. Are you able to reach a conclusion about the research question from this IRS pronouncement(s)? If so, what is your conclusion(s)?arrow_forwardDevon Bishop, age 45, is single. He lives at 1507 Rose Lane, Albuquerque, NM 87131. His Social Security number is 111-11-1117. Devon did not engage in any virtual currency transactions during the year, and he does not want $3 to go to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund. Devon's wife, Ariane, passed away in 2015. Devon's son, Tom, who is age 18, resides with Devon. Tom's Social Security number is 123-45-6788. Devon owns a sole proprietorship for which he uses the accrual method of accounting and maintains no inventory; the business operates as Devon’s Copy Shop, 422 E. Main Street, Albuquerque, NM 87131, IRS business activity code: 453990. His revenues and expenses for 2019 are as follows: Sales revenue $740,000 Cost of goods sold (based on purchases for the year) 405,000 Salary expense 88,000 Rent expense 30,000 Utilities 8,000 Telephone 6,500 Advertising 4,000 Bad debts 5,000 Depreciation* 21,000 Health insurance** 26,000 Accounting and legal fees 7,000…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
How to (Legally) Never Pay Taxes Again; Author: Next Level Life;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q63F1pBrUHA;License: Standard Youtube License