Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781305971493
Author: N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 17, Problem 5PA
Subpart (a):
To determine
Dominant strategy.
Subpart (b):
To determine
Dominant strategy.
Subpart (c):
To determine
Dominant strategy.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Little Kona is a small coffee company that is considering entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company’s profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price:a. Does either player in this game have a dominant strategy?b. Does your answer to part (a) help you figure out what the other player should do?c. What is the Nash equilibrium? Is there only one?d. Big Brew threatens Little Kona by saying, “If you enter, we’re going to set a low price, so you had better stay out.” Do you think Little Kona should believe the threat? Why or why not?c. If the two firms could collude and agree on how to split the total profits, what outcome would they pick?
Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high-tech industry. They facethe following payoff matrix as they decide upon the size of their research budget:a. Does Synergy have a dominant strategy? Explain.b. Does Dynaco have a dominant strategy? Explain.c. Is there a Nash equilibrium for this scenario? Explain. (Hint: Look closely at thedefinition of Nash equilibrium.)
Exercise A.2 .
Sinergy and Dinaco are the only two companies in a high-tech industry. They are faced with the following matrix of results when deciding their research budget:
After analizing the graph, answer the following questions...
a) Does Sinergy have a dominant strategy? Reason your answer.
b) Does Dinaco have a dominant strategy? Reason your answer.
c) Is there a Nash equilibrium in this scenario? Reason your answer.
Chapter 17 Solutions
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Ch. 17.1 - Prob. 1QQCh. 17.2 - Prob. 2QQCh. 17.3 - Prob. 3QQCh. 17 - Prob. 1CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 2CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 3CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 4CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 5CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 6CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 1QR
Ch. 17 - Prob. 2QRCh. 17 - Prob. 3QRCh. 17 - Prob. 4QRCh. 17 - Prob. 5QRCh. 17 - Prob. 6QRCh. 17 - Prob. 7QRCh. 17 - Prob. 1PACh. 17 - Prob. 2PACh. 17 - Prob. 3PACh. 17 - Prob. 4PACh. 17 - Prob. 5PACh. 17 - Prob. 6PACh. 17 - A case study in the chapter describes a phone...Ch. 17 - Prob. 8PACh. 17 - Prob. 9PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Jet Blue and Southwest Airlines are competitors and must decide if they are going to charge a baggage fee to passengers. Use the table below to answer the following questions. Southwest- Jet Blue Baggage Fee No Fee Baggage Fee SW - 600 JB-600 SW - 250 JB - 750 No Fee SW - 750 JB - 200 SW-450 JB - 400 1. Is there a Nash equilibrium, and if yes, where is it? 2. If these firms were able to successfully signal, would that change the outcome of the game? Explain your answer. 3. Does either player have a dominant strategy, and if yes, what is it?arrow_forwardSuppose that Toyota and GM are considering entering a market for electric cars and that their profits from entering or not entering the market are given in the table below. (a) Does GM have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? (b) Does Toyota have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? (c) What is the Nash Equilibrium? (d) Is there any incentive for the two firms to have a collusive outcome different from the Nash equilibrium? Please explain.arrow_forwardGame Theory. Consider the following scenario: Two cloth manufacturing companies, A and B. Firm A designs a few costumes, and they are confident enough that they will be sold quickly in the market, but after launching their designs, they make very little profit due to a lack of capital to promote their designs. Now firm B uses these designs and makes a significant profit due to its brand value. 1. Demonstrate that the situation IS a game (explain strategic interaction/conflict).arrow_forward
- Fill in the chart attached and answer the following questions: a) Bert's dominant strategy is to: (pick the correct answer below ) - no dominant strategy - fish for 20 hours per week -fish for 40 hours per week. b) Ernie's dominant strategy is to: ( pick the correct answer below) - no dominant strategy - fish for 20 hours per week -fish for 40 hours per week. c) Is there a Nash Equilibrium? ( pick the correct answer below) - No - Yes, both fish for 20 hours per week - Yes, one fisher for 40 and the other for 20. - Yes both fish for 30 hours per week. d) Is there an incentive for Bert and Ernie to collude? Why or why not?arrow_forwardConstruct the sequential game tree when Cable-net takes the first mover position by deciding whether to invest in infrastructure capacity expansion. Find the Nash equilibrium path by using the roll-back technique. How much profit does each firm earn? (Hint: the game tree will have three sequential decisions: Cable-net makes the decision first whether to invest in infrastructure capacity expansion, Peoplenet makes the entry decision, and Cable-net decides whether to lower the price.)arrow_forwardUse the information in the following table, which summarizes the payoffs (i.e., profit) to two firms that must decide between an average-quality and a high quality product, to answer the questions that follow: Firm 2 Average Quality High Quality Firm 1 Average Quality 600, 600 400, 1100 High Quality 1100, 400 900, 900 a. What is each player's dominant strategy? Explain your reasoning.b. Referring to the table above, is this an example of a prisoner's dilemma game? Why or why not?c. Is there a Nash equilibrium? If so, what is it?arrow_forward
- 5) The following set of (extensive form) games represent two firms who are attempting to form a cartel. The firms are called "A" and "B". The moves each can make are "Increase output" (1 ) and "don't increase output"(X). The first game (shown below) represents their behavior in a single period where they act simultaneously, unaware of what their opponent is doing. Nash Equilibrium (NE) A: В: A A: 3 A: 1 A: 4 A: 2 B: 3 B: 4 B: 1 B: 2 a. Solve the game by the Rollback (backward induction) method by identifying the dominant strategies (the ones that the players choose), and circle the Nash Equilibrium (for the entire game) and write it above the starting node.arrow_forwardA small town has a duopoly in its tattoo market. Two firms, "Thread the Needle" and "Ink about it" are both competitors. Daily profit is listed in the payoff matrix. The green payouts belong to "Thread the Needle" and the red, "Ink about it". In this game, what is the Nash Equilibrium? A Thread the Needle: don't advertise, Ink about it: don't advertise B Thread the Needle: don't advertise, Ink about it: advertise C Thread the Needle: advertise, Ink about it: advertise D Thread the Needle: advertise, Ink about it: don't advertisearrow_forwardMacmillan Learning Big Bear and Coffeebean are coffee chains in a metro area deciding on a pricing strategy. Use the payoff matrix below to answer the questions. Assume that both firms have complete information on each other's payoff structure and that they choose their pricing strategies simultaneously. Big Bear High price Low price $6 million $3 million High price Coffeebean $6 million $8 million $8 million Low price $3 million $5 million $5 million What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? the lower right quadrant If this is a repeated game, what is one strategy the firms could employ to penalize noncooperative behavior?arrow_forward
- Given the payoff matrix (provided in the image) evaluate the following. 1. What is the dominant strategy of DC Comics? What would Marvel Comics choose given the dominant strategy of DC? Where are the firms doing as best as they can give the scenario, i.e., where is the Nash Equilibrium?arrow_forwardLittle Kona is a small coffee company that is considering entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company's profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price: True or False: Only Little Kona has a dominant strategy in this game. True or False Which of the following outcomes represent a Nash equilibrium in this case? Check all that apply. Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona enters. a.Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona enters. b.Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona does not enter. c.Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona does not enter. Big Brew threatens Little Kona by saying, “If you enter, we're going to set a low price, so you had better stay out.” True or False: Little Kona should not believe the threat. True or False If the two firms could collude and agree on how to split the total profits, what outcome would they…arrow_forwardWho first established the basic principles of game theory? Select one: a. Nash b. Bernoulli с. Кеynes d. Savage e. von Neumann Who developed a duopoly model to show how two firms compete in the price of a good they supply? Select one: a. Cournot b. Keynes c. Bertrand d. Robinson e. Chamberlain What pair provided the most complete formula for options pricing? Select one: a. von-Neumann-Morgenstern b. Black-Scholes c. Fischer Black d. Cournot-Nash e. Modigliani-Millerarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education