The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305967304
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 16, Problem 7BCP
Summary Introduction
Case summary: The
To find : The notice of the tax sale is sufficient.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Explain limited-liability company (LLC).
Klinicki and Lundgren, both furloughed Pan Am pilots stationed in West Germany, decided to start their own charter airline company. They formed Berlinair, Inc., a closely held Oregon corporation. Lundgren was president and a director in charge of developing the business. Klinicki was vice president and a director in charge of operations and maintenance. Klinicki, Lundgren, and Lelco, Inc. (Lundgren’s family business), each owned one-third of the stock. Klinicki and Lundgren, as representatives of Berlinair, met with BFR, a consortium of Berlin travel agents, to negotiate a lucrative air transportation contract. When Lundgren learned of the likelihood of actually obtaining the BFR contract, he formed his own solely owned company, Air Berlin Charter Company (ABC). Although he continued to negotiate for the BFR contract, he did so on behalf of ABC, not Berlinair. Eventually BFR awarded the contract to ABC. Klinicki commenced a derivative action on behalf of Berlinair and a suit against…
Case D: Governance Corporation, Bl corporation,
and Susan Schultz, president and principle
shareholder of TBI, agreed to form a new
corporation, Model Board. TBI and Governance
were in the business of providing unique guidance
formats and analysis tools for advising boards of
directors on governance issues. Mark Schlussel
was supposed to take care of the formalities
involved in incorporating Model Board. When little
progress was made in gaining financing for Model
Board, Schultz announced that TBI intended to
take on some business opportunities that Model
Board had intended to pursue. Model Board sued
TBI for interference with its business opportunities.
TBI moved to dismiss on the grounds that Model
Board had no capacity to sue because it had never
been incorporated. Is a court that adheres to the
historical approach likely to dismiss this suit
because Model Board has no corporate existence?
Explain.
Chapter 16 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The following statements are true, except * -A limited partner is liable for partnership debts up to the extent of his capital contribution -An industrial partner can also be a capitalist partner at the same time. -An industrial partner who engages in business for himself can be excluded from the partnership. -A capitalist partner may engage in the same line of business as that of the partnership -answer not given The following partnership accounts represent a liability of a partner to the partnership, except * -Receivable from partner -Loan to partner -Due from partner -all of the above -answer not given A partner’s capital account is credited for the following transactions, except * -Share in net income -loan from the partner -Original and additional investment -both A and C -answer not givenarrow_forwardSebastian, Wyatt, and Mathew are close friends who graduated with master's degrees in accounting from an Ivy League institution. Instead of seeking employment, the friends decided to create their own accounting business. At their initial meeting, the friends could not decide whether to form a partnership or a limited liability company. You were approached as a company law student for advice on the type of business that would be appropriate for the friends. A) Assume the friends opted to create a partnership, and has asked for your assistance in creating a Partnership deed; create a partnership deed that includes at least six terms that the friends may use to guide the functioning of their firm. The terms should be detailed enough to be legally binding and should be original.arrow_forwardIf within 60 days from the approval of corporation action by stockholders, the dissenting stockholder and the corporation cannot agree on the fair value of the shares, who shall determine the price of shares? * Three disinterested persons, one named by the stockholder, another named by the corporation and the third chosen by the two whose decision by majority is binding and final The dissenting shareholder The Securities and Exchange commission The Commercial Courtarrow_forward
- To Partner or Not to Partner John Willis, who is 27 and single, had just completed his fifth year of employment as a carpenter for a very small homebuilder. His boss, the sole owner of the company, is Tyrone Young. A few days ago, Tyrone asked John if he would like to become a partner, which he could do by contributing $70,000. In turn, John would receive 40 percent of all prof- its earned by the business. John had saved $30,000 and could borrow the balance from his grandmother at a low-interest rate, but he would have to pay her back within 15 years. John was undecided about becoming a partner. He liked the idea but he also knew there were risks and concerns. He decided to talk to Tyrone at lunch. Here is how the conversation went. John: I've been giving your offer a lot of thought, Tyrone. It's a tough decision and I don't want to make the wrong one. So I'd like to chat with you about some of the problems involved in running a business. Tyrone: Sure. I struggled with these issues…arrow_forwardAy-Bee-Cee-Dee Corp. has filed a Subchapter S election under the Internal Revenue Code for taxation purposes. As you know, S corporations are allowed only a limited number of shareholders and, regardless of the number, certain types of entities, including other corporations, cannot be shareholders in S corporations. Carter wants to transfer his shares of Ay-Bee-Cee-Dee Corp. to CarCor, Inc., a corporation that he and his brothers own. If Able, Baker, and Dennis want to preserve their Subchapter S election and, thus, block the transfer of Carter's shares to CarCor (without being stuck having to purchase Carter's shares themselves), which of the following transfer restrictions would best allow them to accomplish their goal?arrow_forwardAy-Bee-Cee-Dee Corp. has filed a Subchapter S election under the Internal Revenue Code for taxation purposes. As you know, S corporations are allowed only a limited number of shareholders and, regardless of the number, certain types of entities, including other corporations, cannot be shareholders in S corporations. Carter wants to transfer his shares of Ay-Bee-Cee-Dee Corp. to CarCor, Inc., a corporation that he and his brothers own. If Able, Baker, and Dennis want to preserve their Subchapter S election and, thus, block the transfer of Carter's shares to CarCor (without being stuck having to purchase Carter's shares themselves), which of the following transfer restrictions would best allow them to accomplish their goal? Multiple Choice Right of first refusal Consent restraint Provision disqualifying purchasers Buy-and-sell agreement Option agreement Right of first refusal Consent restraint Provision disqualifying purchasers Buy-and-sell agreement Option agreementarrow_forward
- Ay-Bee-Cee-Dee Corp. has filed a Subchapter S election under the Internal Revenue Code for taxation purposes. As you know, S corporations are allowed only a limited number of shareholders and, regardless of the number, certain types of entities, including other corporations, cannot be shareholders in S corporations. Carter wants to transfer his shares of Ay-Bee-Cee-Dee Corp. to CarCor, Inc., a corporation that he and his brothers own. If Able, Baker, and Dennis want to preserve their Subchapter S election and, thus, block the transfer of Carter's shares to CarCor (without being stuck having to purchase Carter's shares themselves), which of the following transfer restrictions would best allow them to accomplish their goal? Multiple Choice Provision disqualifying purchasers О Right of first refusal Option agreement О Consent restraintarrow_forwardThe board of directors of a corporation: Do not have the power to bind the corporation to contracts, due to lack of mutual agency. May not also be executive officers of the corporation, due to the separate entity principle. O Are responsible for and have final authority for managing corporate activities. Are responsible for day-to-day operations of the business.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education