1.
Ascertain the
1.
Explanation of Solution
Net present value method (NVP): Net present value method is the method which is used to compare the initial
Compute the net present value of company P as follows:
Year | After-TaxCash Flow (5) (a) | Discount Factor (b) | Present value |
20x0 | $(956,600) | 1.000 | $(956,600) |
20x1 | $310,987 | .893 | 277,711 |
20x2 | $353,688 | .797 | 281,889 |
20x3 | $248,270 | .712 | 176,768 |
20x4 | $232,454 | .636 | 147,841 |
20x5 | $211,200 | .567 | $119,750 |
Net present value | $47,359 |
Table (1)
Corporation O should purchase the new equipment to manufacture waste containers.
Note: Refer Appendix A (table III) for the discount factor.
Working notes (1):
Compute the manufacturing savings per unit cost:
Particulars | Amounts in ($) | Amounts in ($) |
Unit purchase cost | $27.00 | |
New unit variable | ||
Material | $8.00 | |
Direct labor | 7.50 | |
Variable overhead | 4.50 | 20.00 |
Savings per unit | $ 7.00 |
Table (2)
Working notes (2):
Compute the manufacturing savings:
Year | Unit Savings (1) | Estimated Production | Estimated Cost | (1 – Tax Rate) | After-Tax Cost Savings | ||||
20x1 | $7 | 50,000 | $350,000 | 0.6 | $210,000 | ||||
20x2 | 7 | 50,000 | 350,000 | 0.6 | 210,000 | ||||
20x3 | 7 | 52,000 | 364,000 | 0.6 | 218,400 | ||||
20x4 | 7 | 55,000 | 385,000 | 0.6 | 231,000 | ||||
20x5 | 7 | 55,000 | 385,000 | 0.6 | 231,000 |
Table (3)
Working notes (3):
Compute the installed cost of depreciation:
Particulars | Amounts in ($) |
Acquisition cost | $945,000 |
Less: Discount | (18,900 |
Add: Freight | 11,000 |
Installation | 22,900 |
Net installed cost | $960,000 |
Table (4)
Working notes (4):
Compute the MACRS depreciation tax shield:
Year | Installed Cost (3) | MACRS Rate | Depreciation | Tax rate | Tax benefit |
(a) | (b) | (d) | |||
20x1 | $960,000 | 33.33% | $319,968 | 0.4 | $127,987 |
20x2 | 960,000 | 44.45% | 426,720 | 0.4 | 170,688 |
20x3 | 960,000 | 14.81% | 142,176 | 0.4 | 56,870 |
20x4 | 960,000 | 7.41% | 71,136 | 0.4 | 28,454 |
Table (4)
Working notes (5):
Compute the MACRS depreciation tax shield:
Particulars | 20x0 | 20x1 | 20x2 | 20x3 | 20x4 | 20x5 |
Equipment cost | $(945,000) | |||||
Discount (3) | 18,900 | |||||
Freight | (11,000) | |||||
Installation cost | (22,900) | |||||
Savage value for—old equipment | 900 | |||||
Working capital reduction | 2,500 | |||||
Manufacturing savings (2) | $210,000 | $210,000 | $218,400 | $231,000 | $231,000 | |
Supervision | (27,000 | (27,000 | (27,000 | (27,000 | (27,000 | |
Depreciation tax shield (4) | 1,27,987 | 1,70,688 | 56,870 | 28,454 | - | |
Salvage value for new equipment | 7,200 | |||||
After-tax cash flow | $(956,600) | $310,987 | $353,688 | $248,270 | $232,454 | $211,200 |
Table (5)
2.
State the reason for the computation of the payback period of an investment in addition to the determination of net present value.
2.
Explanation of Solution
Since the payback method provides a preliminary screening of projects, many companies prefer computing the payback method, along with the calculation of net present value. Moreover, it indicates the manner in which an original investment can be recovered speedily from the cash flows, when a project is considered risky.
3.
Identify the consecutive whole number amounts in which the payback period for the new equipment is computed.
3.
Explanation of Solution
Payback period: Payback period is the expected time period which is required to recover the cost of investment. It is one of the capital investment method used by the management to evaluate the proposal of long-term investment (fixed assets) of the business. But payback method has high risk than other method, because it does not follow the time value of money concept in valuing the cash inflows.
Compute the payback period for the new equipment:
The payback period is between 3 and 4 years. Because the initial net installed cost is $956,600 and the after tax cash flow for 20x3 year is $912,945
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment
- Jonfran Company manufactures three different models of paper shredders including the waste container, which serves as the base. While the shredder heads are different for all three models, the waste container is the same. The number of waste containers that Jonfran will need during the following years is estimated as follows: The equipment used to manufacture the waste container must be replaced because it is broken and cannot be repaired. The new equipment would have a purchase price of 945,000 with terms of 2/10, n/30; the companys policy is to take all purchase discounts. The freight on the equipment would be 11,000, and installation costs would total 22,900. The equipment would be purchased in December 20x4 and placed into service on January 1, 20x5. It would have a five-year economic life and would be treated as three-year property under MACRS. This equipment is expected to have a salvage value of 12,000 at the end of its economic life in 20x9. The new equipment would be more efficient than the old equipment, resulting in a 25 percent reduction in both direct materials and variable overhead. The savings in direct materials would result in an additional one-time decrease in working capital requirements of 2,500, resulting from a reduction in direct material inventories. This working capital reduction would be recognized at the time of equipment acquisition. The old equipment is fully depreciated and is not included in the fixed overhead. The old equipment from the plant can be sold for a salvage amount of 1,500. Rather than replace the equipment, one of Jonfrans production managers has suggested that the waste containers be purchased. One supplier has quoted a price of 27 per container. This price is 8 less than Jonfrans current manufacturing cost, which is as follows: Jonfran uses a plantwide fixed overhead rate in its operations. If the waste containers are purchased outside, the salary and benefits of one supervisor, included in fixed overhead at 45,000, would be eliminated. There would be no other changes in the other cash and noncash items included in fixed overhead except depreciation on the new equipment. Jonfran is subject to a 40 percent tax rate. Management assumes that all cash flows occur at the end of the year and uses a 12 percent after-tax discount rate. Required: 1. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the make alternative. Calculate the NPV of the make alternative. 2. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the buy alternative. Calculate the NPV of the buy alternative. 3. Which should Jonfran domake or buy the containers? What qualitative factors should be considered? (CMA adapted)arrow_forwardBasuras Waste Disposal Company has a long-term contract with several large cities to collect garbage and trash from residential customers. To facilitate the collection, Basuras places a large plastic container with each household. Because of wear and tear, growth, and other factors, Basuras places about 200,000 new containers each year (about 20% of the total households). Several years ago, Basuras decided to manufacture its own containers as a cost-saving measure. A strategically located plant involved in this type of manufacturing was acquired. To help ensure cost efficiency, a standard cost system was installed in the plant. The following standards have been established for the products variable inputs: During the first week in January, Basuras had the following actual results: The purchasing agent located a new source of slightly higher-quality plastic, and this material was used during the first week in January. Also, a new manufacturing process was implemented on a trial basis. The new process required a slightly higher level of skilled labor. The higher- quality material has no effect on labor utilization. However, the new manufacturing process was expected to reduce materials usage by 0.25 pound per container. Required: 1. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Compute the materials price and usage variances. Assume that the 0.25 pound per container reduction of materials occurred as expected and that the remaining effects are all attributable to the higher-quality material. Would you recommend that the purchasing agent continue to buy this quality, or should the usual quality be purchased? Assume that the quality of the end product is not affected significantly. 2. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Compute the labor rate and efficiency variances. Assuming that the labor variances are attributable to the new manufacturing process, should it be continued or discontinued? In answering, consider the new processs materials reduction effect as well. Explain. 3. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Refer to Requirement 2. Suppose that the industrial engineer argued that the new process should not be evaluated after only one week. His reasoning was that it would take at least a week for the workers to become efficient with the new approach. Suppose that the production is the same the second week and that the actual labor hours were 9,000 and the labor cost was 99,000. Should the new process be adopted? Assume the variances are attributable to the new process. Assuming production of 6,000 units per week, what would be the projected annual savings? (Include the materials reduction effect.)arrow_forwardKleen Corporation, a privately owned and operated single-stream recycling facility, has annual contracts with several cities in the Tri-County Metropolitan Area, Kleen Corporation wants to add a new set of sensors to its existing machinery that will separate plastics and metals from paper and glass materials earlier in the separation process. Two versions of the sensor equipment are available from the Green Corporation. Model 400 has a first cost of $700,000, while Model 1000 costs $1 million. Both have an expected 10% salvage value after their respective useful lives of 6 and 3 years. Assume you work for Kleen Corporation as a project engineer. You have made first-cut estimates of the annual savings (with no annual increases for efficiency) and expenses (AOC with no annual decreases or increases) for both models. Required: a. Perform a ROR analysis using MARR = 5% per year to recommend one of the two models to your president. b. Whether there is any ranking inconsistency present with…arrow_forward
- A grocery distribution center is considering whether to invest in RFID or bar code technology to track its inventory within the warehouse and truck loading operations. The useful life of the RFID and bar code devices is projected to be 5 years with minimal or zero salvage value. The bar code investment cost is $105,000 and can be expected to save at least $33,000 in product theft and lost items annually. The RFID system is estimated to cost $230,000 and will save $30,000 the first year, with an increase of $15,000 annually after the first year. For a 6% MARR, should the manager invest in the RFID system or the bar code system? Analyze incrementally using rate of return.arrow_forwardPhiladelphia Fastener Corporation manufactures nails, screws, bolts, and other fasteners. Management is considering a proposal to acquire new material-handling equipment. The new equipment has the same capacity as the current equipment but will provide operating efficiencies in labor and power usage. The savings in operating costs are estimated at $150,000 annually.The new equipment will cost $300,000 and will be purchased at the beginning of the year when the project is started. The equipment dealer is certain that the equipment will be operational during the second quarter of the year it is installed. Therefore, 60 percent of the estimated annual savings can be obtained in the first year. The company will incur a one-time expense of $30,000 to transfer production activities from the old equipment to the new equipment. No loss of sales will occur, however, because the processing facility is large enough to install the new equipment without interfering with the operations of the…arrow_forwardJackson Inc. disposes of other companies’ toxic waste. Currently, Jackson loads the waste by handinto a truck, which requires labor of $20 per load. Jackson is considering a machine that wouldreduce the amount of time needed to load the waste. The machine would cost $200,000 but wouldreduce labor cost to $5 per load. Assume that Jackson averages 10,000 loads per year. How manyyears (rounded to 2 decimal places) would it take for Jackson to recover the cost of the new machine?arrow_forward
- Johnson Limited is contemplating the installation of a new system that would allow for automated handling of customer inquiries about their order status, account balances, etc. Currently all such inquiries are handled manually by customer service representatives. The software for the new system would cost $214,000. An additional $169,000 would be required for one-time installation costs. Management estimates that the new system would result in costs of $10,300 per year related to addressing software issues and other technological problems that may arise. However, the new system is expected to reduce labour costs by $65,000 per year. Management estimates that the system would be used for five years. Severance costs related to the employees that would be laid off after implementing the new system would be $22,600. Johnson Limited requires a return of at least 15% on investments of this type. Required: Ignore income taxes. 1. Compute the net annual cost savings promised by the new system.…arrow_forwardKingsville plans to buy a street-cleaning machine. A used cleaning vehicle will cost $80,000 and have a $10,000 salvage value at the end of its five year life. A new system with advanced features will cost $160,000 and have a $45,000 salvage value at the end of its five year life. The new system is expected to reduce labor hours compared with the used system. Current street cleaning activity requires the used system to operate 8 hours per day for 20 days per month. Labor costs $50 per hour and MARR is 12% per year. Find the breakeven labor hours for the new system. USE SOLVER FUNCTION IN EXCELarrow_forwardDifend Cleaners has been considering the purchase of an industrial dry-cleaning machine. The existing machine is operable for three more years and will have a zero disposal price. If the machine is disposed now, it may be sold for $170,000. The new machine will cost $360,000 and an additional cash investment in working capital of $170,000 will be required. The new machine will reduce the average amount of time required to wash clothing and will decrease labor costs. The investment is expected to net $130,000 in additional cash inflows during the first year of acquisition and $290,000 each additional year of use. The new machine has a three-year life, and zero disposal value. These cash flows will generally occur throughout the year and are recognized at the end of each year. Income taxes are not considered in this problem. The working capital investment will not be recovered at the end of the asset's life. What is the net present value of the investment, assuming the required rate of…arrow_forward
- A consulting engineer is considering two methods for lining landfill for municipal solid waste management in Bannock County, Idaho. A geosynthetic bentonite clay liner (GCL) will cost $2.0 million to install, and if it is renovated after 4 years at a cost of $400,000, its life can be extended another 2 years. Alternatively, a high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane can be installed that will have a useful life of 12 years. At an interest rate of 6% per year, how much money can be spent on the HDPE liner for the two methods to break even?arrow_forwardA small company that manufactures vibration isolation platforms is trying to decide whether it should immediately upgrade the current assemblysystem D, which is rather labor-intensive, with the more highly automated system C one year from now. Some components of the current system canbe sold now for $9000, but they will be worthless hereafter. The operating cost of the existing system is $192,000 per year. System C will cost $320,000 with a $50,000 salvage value after four years. Its operating cost will be $68,000 per year. If you are told to do a replacement analysis using an interest rate of 10% per year, which system do you recommend?arrow_forwardA process control manager is considering two robots to improve materials-handling capacity in the production of rigid shaft couplings that make dissimilar drive components. Robot X has a first cost of $74,000, an annual M&O cost of $31,000, and $35,000 salvage value, and it will improve revenues by $96,000 per year. Robot Y has a first cost of $146,000, an annual M&O cost of $28,000, and $47,000 salvage value, and it will increase revenues by $120,000 per year. The company's MARR is 10% per year, and it uses a 3-year study period for economic evaluations. Calculate the incremental ROR, and identify the robot the manager should select. The incremental ROR is %. The manager should select robot (Click to select) ♥arrow_forward
- Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning