a
To show:Effect on IS and LM curve due to decrease in the expected future real interest rate.
a
Explanation of Solution
A decrease in expected future interest rates will cause the IS curve to shift to the right. It will also cause the LM curve to shift downwards. Since expectations of future interest rates will affect current variables, the LM curve would shift downwards in much the same way as it would under monetary expansion. The IS curve will shift to the right, causing output to increase and the current interest rate to decrease.
Introduction:
IS curve is a graphical representation of goods
LM curve is a graphical representation of
b)
To show:Effect on IS and LM curve due to an increase in the current real policy interest rate
b)
Explanation of Solution
Increasing the current money supply would shift the LM curve downwards. If the expectations of financial market participants do not change, the IS curve will remain the same and output won't change by much. If people expect the future interest rates to change, the IS curve right shift to the right, increasing output by a significant amount.
Introduction:
IS curve is a graphical representation of goods market equilibrium showing combination of interest rate and output level.
LM curve is a graphical representation of money market equilibrium showing combination of interest rate and output level.
c)
To know:Effect on IS and LM curve due to an increase in expected future taxes.
c)
Explanation of Solution
An increase in future taxes will shift the IS curve to the left. The current output will decrease as consumers will have less disposable income to spend on consumption. This will lead to a lower level of output.
Introduction:
IS curve is a graphical representation of goods market equilibrium showing combination of interest rate and output level.
LM curve is a graphical representation of money market equilibrium showing combination of interest rate and output level.
d)
To find:Effect on IS and LM curve due to decrease in expected future income.
d)
Explanation of Solution
A decrease in expected future income will have the same effect as in part (c). The IS curve will shift to the left and lead to a decrease in consumption. Again, a decrease in future income will cause consumers to have less disposable income, leading to a lower level of output.
Introduction:
IS curve is a graphical representation of goods market equilibrium showing combination of interest rate and output level.
LM curve is a graphical representation of money market equilibrium showing combination of interest rate and output level.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
Macroeconomics, Student Value Edition Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (7th Edition)
- Don't used Ai solutionarrow_forwardThe preferences of a consumer are represented by the following utility function: U = min (×1, 2x2) If income is 100 and p1=p2=1 a) What is the optimal bundle? b) If p₁=4, what is the new optimal bundle? c) If p2=4, what is the new optimal bundle? d) Decompose the price effect into income and substitution effect and provide a graphical representation of your results.arrow_forwardChallenges of Nepal's foreign trade.arrow_forward
- General Accounting Question solution and give me Blank ? Carrow_forwardIt is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives. Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.arrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forward
- answerarrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning