Keynesian transmission mechanism and monetary transmission mechanism.
Explanation of Solution
The Keynesian transmission mechanism states that an increase in money supply affects the aggregate
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 15 Solutions
Macroeconomics
- Suppose an individual in the Grossman model is trying to decide what to have for dinner. His options are as below. Each dish has an effect on the level of home good Z and health H. Мeal Home good Z Health H Steak and eggs +7 -2 Kale salad with broccoli -2 +5 Entire box of cookies +10 -20 Suppose the dinner's single-period utility function is U=3Z+H 1. If the individual is trying to maximize his single-period utility, and he can only select one item from the table (assuming he can afford any item in the table). Which meal would he choose? Explain your answer. 2. A miracle pill is discovered that halves the negative health impact of cookies. How does this impact the individual's choice? Explain your answer. 3. If the individual lives in multi-period rather than single-period, would he value Z or H more in multi-period? Explain your answer. Paragraph I U v A •.. > lili Barrow_forwardOur earlier model focused on the most basic trade-off introduced by the policy. One aspect of the policy that is also heavily debated is the fact that not every household can afford to upgrade their car in order to avoid paying the ULEZ fees. We now want to understand how best to design the scrappage scheme, which subsidises changing cars for those who need it the most. In particular, we want to know whether the scrappage scheme can create a moral hazard problem. To guide our analysis, consider the following simple model. The government would like to introduce a subsidy to help citizens who need their car for work and cannot afford to buy a ULEZ-compliant car. It also wants to ensure that only citizens who need to drive their car regularly use the subsidy. Instead of the two groups of citizens discussed above, we focus on one particular citizen who does not drive very often, only once a year. As a result, this citizen does not emit excessive pollution even with a car that is not…arrow_forwardOur earlier model focused on the most basic trade-off introduced by the policy. One aspect of the policy that is also heavily debated is the fact that not every household can afford to upgrade their car in order to avoid paying the ULEZ fees. We now want to understand how best to design the scrappage scheme, which subsidises changing cars for those who need it the most. In particular, we want to know whether the scrappage scheme can create a moral hazard problem. To guide our analysis, consider the following simple model. The government would like to introduce a subsidy to help citizens who need their car for work and cannot afford to buy a ULEZ-compliant car. It also wants to ensure that only citizens who need to drive their car regularly use the subsidy. Instead of the two groups of citizens discussed above, we focus on one particular citizen who does not drive very often, only once a year. As a result, this citizen does not emit excessive pollution even with a car that is not…arrow_forward
- There are four key relationships upon which the Standard Model is based. Please list each of the four relationships and give one example for eacharrow_forwardTrue or false? According to the Grossman model, if a new drug were discovered that eliminated the steady deterioration of health that accompanies aging – but does not eliminate sudden events like heart attacks or being hit by a bus – then the demand for jelly donuts, french fries, and physical activity in the presence of buses would decline. Justify your answer.arrow_forward16.12. Two consumers, Ron and David, together own 1,000 baseball cards and 5,000 Pokémon cards. Let xR denote the quantity of baseball cards owned by Ron and yR denote the quantity of Pokémon cards owned by Ron. Similarly, let xD denote the quantity of baseball cards owned by David and yD denote the quantity of Pokémon cards owned by David. Suppose, further, that for Ron, MRSRxy = yR/xXR, while for David, MRSPxy = yD/2xD. Finally, suppose xR = 800, yR = 800, xD = 200, and yD = 4,200. a) Draw an Edgeworth box that shows the set of feasible allocations in this simple economy. b) Show that the current allocation of cards is not economically efficient. c) Identify a trade of cards between David and Ron that makes both better off. (Note: There are many possible answers to this problem.)arrow_forward
- Paragraph Styles Trigleater is a hungry individual in the Grossman model deciding what to have for dinner is looking at variable options. Trigleater has a special condition called "Eaterblood" where whatever she eats will affect her health almost immediately. The following table reflects the options she is considering and the effect on health Meal Home Good Z Health H Steak and eggs +9 -4 Kale salad and broccoli -5 +18 Double cheeseburger deluxe with coke If Trigleater's single period utility function is given by U-5Z+2H and she can only select one item from the table above. 12 -18 Allpositive is a new promising pharmaceutical company came with a new supplement "Bestofboth" that will halve the negative health effect and at the same time double the positive health effects. What would be the optimal selection if she takes Bestofboth supplement and what would be the maximum utility Kale salad with broccoli max utility = 47 Double Cheeseburger deluxe with coke max utility = 102 Steak and…arrow_forwardThe following is an excerpt describing the Oregon Medicaid lottery: In 2008, Oregon implemented a limited expansion of its Medicaid program for low-income adults through a lottery, selecting names from a waiting list to fill a limited number of available spots. Those selected had the opportunity to apply for Medicaid and to enroll if they met eligibility requirements. Based on the description, you might describe the Oregon Medicaid lottery as a: randomized experiment "As if random" natural experiment a true natural experimentarrow_forwardThe Akerlof model can be used to model the health insurance market. In this market, which party is analogous to car buyers? Which party is analogous to car sellers?What would it mean for the health insurance market to unravel?arrow_forward
- Indicate whether each of the following examples of behavior is consistent with the way the traditional econiomic framework suggests people should act, or whether it is reserved for behavioral economists to examine. Consistent with the Predictions of Traditional Economic Models Reserved for Behavioral Economics Example Some people would be willing to make a large sacrifice in order to help a loved one. Some people care about how much money they make relative to other people rather than their absolute level of income. Some people treat $95 they earn differently from $95 they win in a random drawing. Some people choose to work fewer hours after receiving a raise at work.arrow_forwardIsabella understands that if she were to play golf, she would be able to spend time outdoors (where she likes to be) with people she enjoys. However, because she has taken golf lessons 10+ times and still cannot hit the golf ball, she does not believe that she can actually play golf. Based on what you know about Expectancy Theory, will she join her friends to play golf this summer? Group of answer choices Yes. Instrumentality and Valence are high. No. Valence is too high. No. Expectancy is low. Yes. Instrumentality is high.arrow_forwardSuppose you are designing an intervention to increase daily physical activity among adults. Describe how you would draw on concepts from behavioral economics to design the intervention.arrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning