a
Concept Introduction:
Contingent liability is a potential liability under which outflow of resources is probable due to the happening of an uncertain future event.Contingent liabilities are not recorded in financial statements. Theseare only disclosed in notes to accounts.
Provision for contingencies:
Provision should be made for contingencies if it is probable that loss will occur, and the amount can be computed with reasonable certainty.
The auditor’s course of action if the given situation occurs.
b
Concept Introduction:
Contingent liability:
Contingent liability is a potential liability under which outflow of resources is probable due to the happening of an uncertain future event. Contingent liabilities are not recorded in financial statements. These are only disclosed in notes to accounts.
Provision for contingencies:
Provision should be made for contingencies if it is probable that loss will occur, and the amount can be computed with reasonable certainty.
The auditor’s course of action if the given situation occurs.
c
Concept Introduction:
Contingent liability:
Contingent liability is a potential liability under which outflow of resources is probable due to the happening of an uncertain future event. Contingent liabilities are not recorded in financial statements. These are only disclosed in notes to accounts.
Provision for contingencies:
Provision should be made for contingencies if it is probable that loss will occur, and the amount can be computed with reasonable certainty.
The auditor’s course of action if the given situation occurs.
d.
Concept Introduction:
Contingent liability:
Contingent liability is a potential liability under which outflow of resources is probable due to the happening of an uncertain future event. Contingent liabilities are not recorded in financial statements. These are only disclosed in notes to accounts.
Provision for contingencies:
Provision should be made for contingencies if it is probable that loss will occur, and the amount can be computed with reasonable certainty.
The auditor’s course of action if the given situation occurs.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 14 Solutions
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)
- Analyze each of the following situations below and provide your assessment of the potential resolution of each scenario, including potential liability for the auditor or audit firm involved. Yasmeen CPA is a defendant in a lawsuit alleging that she should be held liable for gross negligence for a fraud involving the valuation of securities included in the financial statements of one of his clients. Yasmeen was uncertain how to establish a correct valuation for the securities and decided to rely on the price estimation supplied by management. A lawsuit has been filed against Elena CPA, charging here with constructive fraud in the audit of Broughton Company’s financial statements. Elena has examined all the audit documentation in his files and reviewed all relevant auditing standards. She is convinced that his audit fully complies with standards of the profession but is uncertain what he should use as his primary defense tactic. Canon Film filed for a bankruptcy in January 2012. A…arrow_forwardBelow here were subsequent event that occurs in your client. Consider that all events were has material effect on client’s financial statement. The auditor is auditing financial statement for the year ended December 31, 2020 and is completing the audit in March 15, 2021.4) On February 15, 2021, the civil court decided that Client Company must pay compensation loss due to defect product sold to their customer. lawsuits started in court since June 20205) On February 20, 2021, a major of client customer which has large amount of outstanding A/R suddenly fill for bankruptcy6) On April 1, 2021 fire rage accident destroy client warehouse and the loss were materialQuestions:Indicate type 1 subsequent event, type 2 subsequent event, or not subsequent event. What kinds of action, client need to do? Adjust, disclose, or no need to do adjust/disclose for every point form 1) to 6). Provide the reason why it should be adjusted or disclose or neither.arrow_forwardFor each separate case, state whether the action or situation shows a violation of the AICPACode of Professional Conduct; if so, explain why and cite the relevant rule or interpretation.a. Your client, Contrary Corporation, is very upset over the fact that your audit last yearfailed to detect an $800,000 inventory overstatement caused by employee theft and falsification of the records. The board discussed the matter and authorized its attorneys toexplore the possibility of a lawsuit for damages.b. Contrary Corporation filed a lawsuit alleging negligent audit work, seeking $1 million indamages.c. In response to the lawsuit by Contrary, you decided to bring litigation against certain officers of the company alleging management fraud and deceit. You are asking for a damagejudgment of $500,000.d. The Allright Insurance Company paid Contrary Corporation $700,000 under a fidelitybond covering an inventory theft by employees. Allright is suing your public accountingfirm for damages on the…arrow_forward
- Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. Will the negligence of Mark Williams, CPA, prevent him from recovering on a liability insurance policy covering the practice of…arrow_forwardMark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. If Apex Construction also sues Williams for negligence, what are the probable legal defenses Williams’s attorney would raise?…arrow_forwardMark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. What liability does Williams have to Jackson Financial? Explainarrow_forward
- An accountant is hired by a company to do an audit on their financial statements. The accountant does everything she is asked. 16 days after the audit, the CFO is arrested for embezzlement. The stockholders sue the accountant, suggesting that she should have discovered the embezzlement during the audit. Should the court find that the accountant is negligent? Group of answer choices A. Yes, because an accountant is hired to determine if there is embezzlement B. Yes, but only if it is shown than an ordinary accountant would have also uncovered the embezzlement C. No, because the accountant was hired by the CFO, so therefore it would have been a conflict of interest D. Yes, because the accountant was hired by the CFO, therefore it is likely the accountant is also guiltyarrow_forwardMr. Bader is leaving his Auditing Firm to become the Finance Director of his client company. The ethical dilemma that he is most likely to face would be conflict in: a. Confidentiality b. Due Care c. Professional Competence d. Professional Behaviorarrow_forwardThe following relates to the Menendez–Halliburton situation described in the text.(a) How would you characterize Halliburton’s accounting for revenue from ethical and professional perspectives?(b) Once KPMG learned that Menendez had provided a complaint to Halliburton’s audit committee highlighting questionable accounting and auditing practices, the KPMG audit partner instructed the audit team members to avoid communications with Menendez. How would you characterize those actions ethically and professionally?arrow_forward
- Assume that after completion of all fieldwork on the audit of Andler Company, but prior to issuance of the audit report, the senior on the engagement informed the engagement partner that he just discovered that his wife has an immaterial investment in Andler Company stock. Which of the following is most accurate as to AICPA Code of Professional Conduct requirements? Multiple Choice The CPA firm must resign the engagement. No action is necessary since he was unaware of his wife’s investment while performing the audit. The CPA firm should evaluate the significance of the breach on the engagement team’s integrity, objectivity and professional skepticism and ability to issue an audit report and then take proper action. The senior’s performance on the audit should be reviewed by the engagement partner to determine that the work performance was acceptable.arrow_forwardRationalization for fraud can fall under two categories: “no harm” and “no responsibility.” Assume an employee is directed by management to reduce recorded expenses at year-end by insignificant amounts individually, but which are material in total. How might the employee justify her actions if questioned by the auditor with respect to no harm and no responsibility? What stage of moral development in Kohlberg’s model is best illustrated by the employee’s actions? Why?arrow_forwardAs the auditor for Company A, you discover that a material sale ($500,000 sale; cost of goods of $300,000) was made to a customer this year. Because of poor internal accounting controls, the sale was never recorded. Your client makes a management decision not to bill the customer because such a long time has passed since the shipment was made. You determine, to the best of your ability, that the sale was not fraudulent. Using the framework for ethical decision making, determine whether the auditor should require either a recording or a disclosure of the sales transaction. Instructions: Using the framework for ethical decision making, determine whether the auditor should require either a recording or a disclosure of the sales transaction. Please make sure to use at least 100 words in your response. Once you give your response, please respond to at least two of your peers using at least 50 words in your responses. Remember to follow the netiquette guidelines found in the course…arrow_forward
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage LearningAuditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub
- Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:Cengage