The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305967304
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 14, Problem 4BCP
Summary Introduction
Case summary: Company F contracted with company RB to install an awning system for outdoor seating coverage area. RB was disappointed with the execution of the work but did not gave any time to F to improve the error in the execution of the work. After two months of usage, the awning system was removed for the replacement of building’s siding and some defects were found in the welds. Both the parties differed in their opinion on damaged welds. RB paid F only
To find: The right of RB to rescind the contract and obtain the paid price.
Summary Introduction
Case summary: F contracted with RB to install an awning system for outdoor seating coverage area. RB was disappointed with the execution of the work but did not gave any time to F to improve the error in the execution of the work. After two months of usage, the awning system was removed for the replacement of building’s siding and some defects were found in the welds. Both the parties differed in their opinion on damaged welds. RB paid F only
To find: F’s right to recover the differences between the paid and the contracted price.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Reaction to discussion below:
Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. was a tenant in a building where alarm systems were maintained by the ADT company. When the systems were defective and allowed water into the building, it damaged Melodee’s property; Then Melodee decided to sue ADT and their defense was that the service contract limited the liability to 10% of the annual service charge given to the customers. The limitation can be valid since the ADT company did not provide much liability protection. The ADT company can offer another protection plan to Melodee, which would cover her property but at a higher price rate. This case limitation of liability clauses will be enacted since ADT company was not fully liable for Melodee's property, which only would cover the limited 10%. A limitation of liability clauses contract states that one of the parties is not fully liable for damages in case of a breach. The ADT company is at fault for the malfunctions in their systems they should offer a higher…
Syncrude ordered 30 gearboxes from Hunter, a manufacturer, to drive its conveyor belts in the Alberta tar sands project. Syncrude provided specifications of what the gearboxes were required to do, and Hunter designed them to meet those specifications. The contract contained an express term guaranteeing the gearboxes for two years. When the period had expired, the gearboxes developed faults that were found to be due to faulty designed.
Issues: Liability of Hunter for the design faults which caused the gearboxes to fail; Liability of Hunter under the statutory warranty in the Sale of Goods Act?
S insured his appliance store under an owner, landlords, and tenant’s policy that included products liability coverage. While he was demonstrating a microwave oven the door came open and injured a customer. Which of the following would protect S?
The oven manufacture’s products liability policy
The premises-operation section on S’s policy
The products Liability section on S’s policy
The incidental contracts section of S’s policy
Chapter 14 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- John Campbell, an employee of Manhattan Construction Company, claims to have injured his back as a result of a fall while repairing the roof at one of the Eastview apartment buildings. He filed a lawsuit against Doug Reynolds, the owner of Eastview Apartments, asking for damages of $1,500,000. John claims that the roof had rotten sections and that his fall could have been prevented if Mr. Reynolds had told Manhattan Construction about the problem. Mr. Reynolds notified his insurance company, Allied Insurance, of the lawsuit. Allied must defend Mr. Reynolds and decide what action to take regarding the lawsuit.Some depositions and a series of discussions took place between both sides. As a result, John Campbell offered to accept a settlement of $750,000. Thus, one option is for Allied to pay John $750,000 to settle the claim. Allied is also considering making John a counteroffer of $400,000 in the hope that he will accept a lesser amount to avoid the time and cost of going to trial.…arrow_forwardNational-Southwire Aluminum Company (NSA) owns and operates a plant that emits fluoride. When its wet scrubbers were turned off as part of its regular maintenance program, NSA discovered no appreciable change in ambient fluoride levels. Because of the expense of operating the scrubbers and its belief that using the scrubbers did not significantly affect ambient fluoride levels, NSA desired to turn the scrubbers off permanently. Accordingly, NSA sought a determination from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that turning off the scrubbers would not constitute a modification requiring the application of new source performance standards to the plant. Turning off the scrubbers would result in an increase of more than 1,100 tons per year of fluoride emissions with no decrease in the emission of any other pollutant. This increase was nearly four hundred times the level the EPA had established as inconsequential. The EPA determined that turning off the scrubbers would constitute a “new…arrow_forwardTube Art was involved in moving a reader board sign to a new location. Tube Art’s service manager and another employee went to the proposed site and took photographs and measurements. Later, a Tube Art employee laid out the exact size and location for the excavation by marking a four-by-four-foot-square on the asphalt surface with yellow paint. The dimensions of the hole, including its depth of six feet, were indicated with spray paint inside the square. After the layout was painted on the asphalt, Tube Art engaged a backhoe operator, Richard F. Redford, to dig the hole. Redford began digging in the early evening hours at the location designated by Tube Art. At approximately 9:30 P.M., the bucket of Redford’s backhoe struck a small natural gas pipeline. After examining the pipe and finding no indication of a break or leak, he concluded that the line was not in use and left the site. Shortly before 2:00 A.M. on the following day, an explosion and fire occurred in the building serviced…arrow_forward
- In employment establishments, an employee may be different from an independent contractor. By reference to case law, explain the tests used by courts to distinguish an employee from an independent contractor.arrow_forwardDiscuss any five (5) remedies available to the employees in case of breach of contract. b) With the aid of examples, explain the term vicarious liability.arrow_forwardAnalyze the legal principles and remedies available in cases of contract breach. Discuss anticipatory repudiation, material breach, and the concept of substantial performance. Explain the potential remedies available to non-breaching parties.arrow_forward
- Reaction to discussion below: In Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. v. ADT Co., the service contract's limitation of liability clause was lawful and enforceable. The equal parties freely entered the contract with knowledge of the potential risks, they should be bound by the agreement, including the limitation of liability clause that was clearly stated in the contract. As long as the contract and the clauses within it are clear, unambiguous, and negotiated between two equal parties, it will most likely hold in court as valid. These clauses divide the risk of loss among the parties and can limit one party's possible liability in the event of a breach even if it’s due to negligence. However, it is important to balance the competing policy interests at play. Although this opinion highlights freedom of contract and efficient risk allocation, it may also have the unintended effect of reducing incentives for companies to act responsibly and ensure the proper functioning of their services. As such,…arrow_forwardJack Tupp contracts to work for Iona Carr Autohaus during February for $1,800. On January 17, Iona Carr Autohaus wrongfully cancels the contract. Jack Tupp refuses to accept a similar job with another car dealership which would have paid him $1,650. If Jack Tupp sues Iona Carr Autohaus, how much in damages would he most likely recover?arrow_forwardMartha Simms is the plaintiff in a contract suit she has brought against Floral Supply, Inc., for its failure to deliver the green sponge Martha needed in building the floral designs she sells to exclusive home decorators. Martha had to obtain the sponge from another supplier and was late on seven deliveries. One of Martha’s customers has been called by Martha’s lawyer as a witness and is now on the witness stand, testifying about Martha’s late performance and the penalty she charged. The lawyer for Floral Supply knows that Martha’s customer frequently waives penalties for good suppliers. 1. In what legal tribunal the Simm’s case is tried? 2.To which jurisdiction does the trial of the Simm’s case belong?arrow_forward
- Martha Simms is the plaintiff in a contract suit she has brought against Floral Supply, Inc., for its failure to deliver the green sponge Martha needed in building the floral designs she sells to exclusive home decorators. Martha had to obtain the sponge from another supplier and was late on seven deliveries. One of Martha’s customers has been called by Martha’s lawyer as a witness and is now on the witness stand, testifying about Martha’s late performance and the penalty she charged. The lawyer for Floral Supply knows that Martha’s customer frequently waives penalties for good suppliers. Provide a paragraph with more than five sentences (i.e., in the section for “Purport”) that interprets the theme of the case, based on conceptsarrow_forwardMoulton Cavity & Mold, Inc., agreed to manufacture twenty-six innersole molds to be purchased by Lyn-Flex. Moulton delivered the twenty-six molds to Lyn-Flex after Lyn-Flex allegedly approved the sample molds. However, Lyn-Flex rejected the molds, claiming that the molds did not satisfy the specifications exactly, and denied that it had ever approved the sample molds. Moulton then sued, contending that Lyn-Flex wrongfully rejected the molds. Lyn-Flex argued that the Code’s perfect tender rule permitted its rejection of the imperfect molds, regardless of Moulton’s substantial performance. Decision?arrow_forwardDiscuss 6 main remedies for breach of contract.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education