Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094757
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 14, Problem 3TS
Summary Introduction
Case summary:
Person D, age sixteen purchased a used truck from the company S auto sales in cash owned by person S. Person S did not question person D’s age as he assumed person D to be a major. Nine months later, the car started showing problems and eventually engine blew up. Person D requested to annul the contract and give him a full refund.
To discuss: Which side should prevail.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Suggest some measures to enhance the principles governing the doctrine of separation of powers.
What are third party beneficiary contracts and what are the rights of the parties?
Why would a business support allowing a transfer of rights or duties to third parties?.
Chapter 14 Solutions
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
Ch. 14 - Prob. 1COCh. 14 - Prob. 2COCh. 14 - Prob. 3COCh. 14 - Prob. 4COCh. 14 - Prob. 5COCh. 14 - Prob. 1QCh. 14 - Prob. 2QCh. 14 - Prob. 3QCh. 14 - Prob. 4QCh. 14 - Prob. 5Q
Ch. 14 - Prob. 6QCh. 14 - Prob. 7QCh. 14 - Prob. 8QCh. 14 - Prob. 9QCh. 14 - Prob. 10CPCh. 14 - Prob. 11CPCh. 14 - Prob. 12CPCh. 14 - Prob. 13CPCh. 14 - Prob. 14CPCh. 14 - Prob. 15CPCh. 14 - Prob. 16CPCh. 14 - Prob. 17CPCh. 14 - Prob. 18CPCh. 14 - Prob. 19CPCh. 14 - Prob. 20CPCh. 14 - Prob. 21CPCh. 14 - Prob. 22CPCh. 14 - Prob. 1TSCh. 14 - Prob. 2TSCh. 14 - Prob. 3TS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Goodward, a newly-hired newspaper reporter for The Cape Cod News, learned that the local cranberry growers had made an agreement under which they pooled their cranberry crops each year and sold them at what they determined to be a fair price. Goodward believes that such an agreement is in restraint of trade and a violation of the antitrust laws. Is he correct?arrow_forwardA contract is terminated if A: One of the parties decide not go forward B: A third party intervenes C: It is impossible for one of the parties to perform D: One party assigns their right to anotherarrow_forwardDamages and Equitable Remedies (a) How are damages different than equitable remedies? (b) If David breaches his agreement to pay $5000 to Laura for her car, and she later sells the car to Ellysa for $4000, what is the measure of Laura’s damages from David’s breach? (c) Explain one’s duty to mitigate contract damages. (d) If Olaf breaches his obligation to deliver a new car to Lisa, is it likely that a court will require Olaf to deliver the car through the remedy of specific performance?arrow_forward
- What is the main difference between contracts discharged due to operation of law and contracts discharged due to acts of the parties? Discharge due to acts of the parties never requires court intervention, whereas discharge due to operation of law always does. Discharge due to operation of law reflects at least one party's intent, whereas discharge due to acts of the parties doesn't necessarily reflect either party's intent. Discharge due to acts of the parties is legally binding, whereas discharge due to operation of law is not. Discharge due to operation of law doesn't necessarily reflect either party's intent, whereas discharge due to acts of the parties reflects at least one party's intent. 11 XIR Submit > 17arrow_forwardBrandt Crossing Investments, Inc., was a family-owned property investment organization, investing in undeveloped properties when prices were low and then selling them when prices went up. Among its holdings, Brandt Crossing owned fifty acres of undeveloped land next to another fifty acres of undeveloped land owned by Khloe Hadid. Carter Rios, property manager for Brandt Crossing, approached Hadid and offered to purchase her fifty acres “for Brandt.” Hadid sold the property for $50,000. Within one year, Brandt Crossing sold its 100 acres, including the property bought from Hadid, to a developer for $1,000,000. Richard Brandt, a 5% owner of Brandt Crossing Investments and an old high school acquaintance of Hadid, saw her at the mall and told her of the recent sale. Furious that she had lost out on the income and convinced that Rios had misled her, Hadid sued Richard Brandt for the acts of his agent, Rios. Hadid argued that the facts were sufficient to create an agency by estoppel…arrow_forward(c)Ghaffar purchased a piece of land from Sharif who is an engineer by profession. During the discussion prior to the purchase, Sharif had told Ghaffar that in his opinion, the land would be able to support 2,500 mango trees. However, only 2, 300 trees could eventually be planted on the land. Under the provisions of the Contract Act 1872, discuss whether Ghaffar can claim damages on the grounds of fraud. (4)arrow_forward
- How can a party's conduct or behavior give rise to an implied contract?arrow_forwardA proxy is a representative of a (shareholder, officer, director) who is liable to (vote, sell shares, buy shares) on the shareholder's behalf at a shareholder meeting. Proxy agreements are generally valid for (eleven months, twelve months, thirteen months). At the time of the shareholder meeting, Francescas's proxy agreement was (fourteen months, thirteen months, twelve months) old. Therefore, Francesca's proxy agreement with her representative (expired, did not expire), and her representative (may not, may) vote on Franscesca's behalf. What if the Facts were Different Assume that Brenda purchased Mike's 100 shares of stock and Fransesca signed a new proxy agreement on May 15, 2020. Brenda's purchase of stock on May 15, 2020, is (after, before) the record date. On the record date, (Mike, Brenda) is the owner of the 100 shares and (may not, may) vote based on ownership of the 100 shares at the shareholder meeting. If Francesca signed a proxy agreement on May 15, 2020, it is (more…arrow_forwardCase: Ahmed, who was admitted to a hospital, was required to undergo surgery. Before his operation, he agreed to sell his house which was already listed for sale, to his doctor for Rs. 9.7 million. The market price of the house was Rs. 10 Million. After a successful operation, Ahmed rescinded the agreement alleging “Undue Influence” by the doctor. Can he succeed? Yes or No? Justify your answer keeping in view the ingredients of undue influence as laid down in Contract Act, 1872.arrow_forward
- help me and also explain please.arrow_forwardAurum Fields Ltd (“Aurum”) is a gold mining company. Dr Lilly le Fleur is one of 10 directors of the company. Lilly is a senior professor in the Faculty of Management Studies at the University ofRosebank, in Johannesburg. Lilly consented to be a director on the board of Aurum Fields Ltd in 2019. In January 2020, the directors of Aurum discovered that Lilly had misappropriated an amount of R200 million rand from the company by allowing money due to the company to be paid into her personal account. Q.3.1 Assume for this question that you are Aurum’s attorney and they approach you for advice. Explain the two ways in which Lilly may be removed from the board of directors. Your answer must include the requirements that must be met. Q.3.2 Assume that one of the two meetings referred to in Q.3.1 above made the decision to remove Lilly from the board of directors. Who are the persons, besides a shareholder or a director, that apply to court for Lilly to be declared a delinquent director? List…arrow_forwardAurum Fields Ltd (“Aurum”) is a gold mining company. Dr Lilly le Fleur is one of 10 directors of the company. Lilly is a senior professor in the Faculty of Management Studies at the University ofRosebank, in Johannesburg. Lilly consented to be a director on the board of Aurum Fields Ltd in 2019. In January 2020, the directors of Aurum discovered that Lilly had misappropriated an amount of R200 million rand from the company by allowing money due to the company to be paid into her personal account. Q.3.3 Distinguish between a director that is ineligible and one that is disqualified. In your answer, include names or categories of persons who are ineligible and disqualified. Q.3.4 List any four grounds for an order of delinquency.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON