Economics (7th Edition) (What's New in Economics)
7th Edition
ISBN: 9780134738321
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 14, Problem 14.2.14PA
Subpart (a):
To determine
Natural oligopoly and implicit collusion.
Subpart (b):
To determine
Natural oligopoly and implicit collusion.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Use the following table to calculate the four=firm concentration ratio for the U. S. auto market. Does this indicate a concentrated market or not? The table is............. GM 19% Ford 17% Toyota 14% Chrysler 11%
AT&T and Verizon have two pricing strategies: Set a high (monopoly) price or set a low (competitive) price. Suppose that if they both set a competitive price, economic profit for both is zero. If both set a monopoly price, AT&T makes an economic profit of $100 million and Verizon makes an economic profit of $200 million. If AT&T sets a low price and Verizon sets a high price, AT&T makes an economic profit of $200 mil- lion and Verizon incurs an economic loss of $100 million; if AT&T sets a high price and Verizon sets a low price, AT&T incurs an economic loss of $50 million and Verizon makes an economic profit of $250 million.
Create the payoff matrix for this game.
What is the equilibrium of this game? Is the equilibrium efficient?
In January 2007, XM enjoyed about 58 percent of satellite radio subscribers, and Sirius had the remaining 42 percent. Both firms were suffering losses, despite their dominance in the satellite radio market. In 2008, the DOJ decided not to challenge a merger, and these two firms united to become Sirius XM. If you were an economic consultant for Sirius, what economic arguments would you have presented to the DOJ to persuade it not to challenge the merger? Explain
Chapter 14 Solutions
Economics (7th Edition) (What's New in Economics)
Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.1.1RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.2RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.3RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.4PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.5PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.6PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.7PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.8PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.9PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.1.10PA
Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.2.1RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.2RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.3RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.4RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.5PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.6PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.7PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.8PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.9PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.10PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.11PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.12PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.13PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.14PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.15PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.16PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.17PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2.18PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.3.1RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.3.2RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.3.3PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.3.4PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.3.5PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.3.6PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.1RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.2RQCh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.3PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.4PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.5PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.6PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.7PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.4.8PACh. 14 - Prob. 14.2CTECh. 14 - Prob. 14.3CTE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Exercise A.5 Consider a company with market power that sells its product to two distinct consumer groups (type 1 consumers and type 2 consumers). Graphically illustrate the following situation: "if you charge a single price only consumers of type 1 will be able to buy the product but, if you charge differentiated prices, the two types of consumers will be able to buy it"arrow_forwardMany European governments are reluctant to allow online betting in an attempt to protect their national gambling businesses. A recent study found that seven countries out of the 27 in the European Union banned online gambling. Of the other 20 only 13 have opened their markets to competition; in the rest gambling is dominated by monopolies owned or licensed by the government. In the Netherlands, for example, residents can only place online bets with a state monopoly: De Lotto. The Ministry of Justice even warned banks in the country that they could be prosecuted if they transferred money to online gambling companies. Other countries have ordered online betting companies to block access to their sites. Their governments argue that this is to protect people from gambling excessively. However the revenue they gain from their own monopolies should not be ignored as a possible motive. Questions If governments believe that gambling is bad for their citizens then in economic terms how would…arrow_forwardThe New York Times reports that Wal-Mart has decided to challenge Netflix and enter the online DVD-by-mail market. Because of economies of scale, Wal-Mart has a slight cost advantage relative to Netflix. Wal-Mart is considering the use of a limit pricing strategy. It can enter the market by matching Netflix on price. If it does, and Netflix maintains its price, then both firms would earn $5 million. But if Netflix drops its price in response, Wal-Mart would have to follow and would earn $2 million; Netflix would earn $3 million. Or Wal-Mart could enter the market with a price that is below Netflix's current price but above its marginal cost. If it does, Netflix would make one of two moves. It could reduce its price to below that of Wal-Mart. If it does, Wal-Mart will earn a profit of $0, and Netflix will earn a profit of $2 mil- lion. Or Netflix could keep its present price. If Netflix keeps its present price, Wal-Mart can keep its present price and earn $6 million (while Netflix earns…arrow_forward
- I am intrigued by the following article detailing how Nestle agreed to pay Starbucks $7.2B to distribute and sell Starbucks’ packaged coffees and teas around the world. Why would Nestle purposely put its competitors’ brands right next to it in the store, and then pay them for the privilege? Why wouldn’t Starbucks just take care of distributing its own brands rather than go through Nestle? Please explain how this outcome could be profit maximizing for both firmsarrow_forwardEconomics Reference the following information about the market demand function for questions 1 to 15. These questions are on different types of market structures – monopoly, perfect competition, Cournot oligopoly market, and the Stackelberg oligopoly market. The market demand function is given the following equation: P = 2000 – Q where Q is the industry’s output level. Suppose initially this market is served by a single firm. Let the total cost function of this firm be given the function C(Q) = 200Q. The firm’s marginal cost of production (MC) is equal to the firm’s average cost (AC): MC = AC = 200. Now suppose the two firms engage in Stackelberg market competition. Assume firm 1 is the leader (first-mover) and firm 2 is the follower firm (second-mover). Marginal profit function of Stackelberg leader: 900−Q1 QUESTION 14: What will be the market price in this Stackelberg model? Group of answer choices $480 $650 $720 $900 QUESTION 15: Can you calculate the profit earned by the…arrow_forwardFirm A produces good X and Firm B produces good Y with the following demand functions: Qx = 150 - 10Px - 4Py Qy = 75 - 5Py - Px Price of good X is $8 and price of good Y is $4. Firm A and Firm B will merge together. The firms have announced that price of good Y will decrease by 1 percent. Will the Department of Justice allow the merger? Show mathematically and very briefly explain.arrow_forward
- The Canadian Radio-Television Commission (CRTC) makes decisions about who can be licensed to operate radio or television stations, and who can sell various telecommunication services. Recently the CRTC agreed that one firm should have the exclusive right (i.e., a monopoly) to sell Direct-to-Home satellite TV services. The Canadian government reacted to this decision by ordering the CRTC to allow other firms to apply for the right to sell the same service. Does the Canadian government have the right to intervene in this matter? Why or why not? Why do you think the Canadian government would want to intervene in this matter?arrow_forwardBriefly describe the Stackelberg model. How does this model differ from the Cournot model in terms of each firm's output and profits? How does the price in a Stackelberg model compare to the Cournot price and the monopoly price?arrow_forward5.4 Food service firms buy meat, vegetables, and other foods and resell them to restaurants, schools, and hospitals. US Foods and Sysco are by far the largest firms in the indus- try. In 2015, these firms were attempting to combine or merge to form a single firm. A news story quoted one res- taurant owner as saying: "There was definite panic in the restaurant industry... when the merger was announced. They know they're going to get squeezed." a. Analyze the effect on the food service market of US Foods and Sysco combining. Draw a graph to illustrate your answer. For simplicity, assume that the market was perfectly competitive before the firms combined and would be a monopoly afterward. Be sure your graph shows changes in the equilibrium price, the equilibrium quantity, consumer surplus, producer surplus, and deadweight loss. b. Why would restaurant owners believe they would be "squeezed" by this development?arrow_forward
- Let's assume that the table below represents the market shares for the smart phone market. Firm Market Share Apple 44% Fujitsu 3% Kyocera 2% LG 3% Motorola 13% Samsung 24% Sanyo 4% Siemens 2% Sony Ericsson 5% Based on this information, the four-firm concentration ratio isarrow_forwardThis chapter discusses companies that are oligopolists in the market for the goods they sell. Many of the same ideas apply to companies that are oligopolists in the market for the inputs they buy. If sellers who are oligopolists try to increase the price of goods they sell, the goal of buyers who are oligopolists is to try to decrease the prices of goods they buy. Major league baseball team owners have an oligopoly in the market for baseball players. The owners' goal is to keep players' salaries . True or False: This goal is difficult to achieve because teams can attract better players with higher salaries. True False Baseball players went on strike in 1994 because they would not accept the salary cap that the owners wanted to impose. True or False: The owners felt the need for a salary cap to help prevent any team from cheating. True Falsearrow_forwardUse the following table to calculate the Herfindal-Hirshman Index for the U.S. auto market. Would the FTC approve a merger between Gm and Ford? Explain your response. The table is......... GM 19% Ford 17% Toyota 14% Chrysler 11%arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education