a)
To calculate: The equilibrium
a)
Answer to Problem 8TY
The equilibrium level of GDP is derived as
Explanation of Solution
Substituting the values of rate of interest
in the investment function and the total investment is being calculated as follows:
The equilibrium level of GDP is derived as follows:
By bringing the variable
to the left hand side:
Therefore, the equilibrium level of GDP is
Introduction: The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the summation of market values, which includes the final services and goods for a period of time, in an economy.
b)
To Calculate: The equilibrium GDP.
b)
Answer to Problem 8TY
The equilibrium level of GDP is derived as
Explanation of Solution
Substituting the values of rate of interest
in the investment function and the total investment is being calculated as follows:
The equilibrium level of GDP is derived as follows:
By bringing the variable
to the left hand side:
Therefore, the equilibrium level of GDP is
Introduction: The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the summation of market values, which includes the final services and goods for a period of time, in an economy.
c)
To Calculate: The equilibrium GDP.
c)
Answer to Problem 8TY
The equilibrium level of GDP is derived as
Explanation of Solution
Substituting the values of rate of interest
in the investment function and the total investment is being calculated as follows:
The equilibrium level of GDP is derived as follows:
By bringing the variable
to the left hand side:
Therefore, the equilibrium level of GDP is
Introduction: The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the summation of market values, which includes the final services and goods for a period of time, in an economy.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- use the following equation. C = 50 + 0.6(Y – T) 9) What is autonomous consumption in this economy? a) 0.4 b) 0.6 c) 30 d) 50 10) What is the government spending multiplier for this economy? a) -1.5 b) 1.5 c) -2.5 d) 2.5 11) If the government spends 20 more then what happens to consumption? a) increases by 50 b) decreases by 50 c) increases by 30 d) decreases by 30 12) In this economy we know that lowering taxes by 10 a) affects real GDP the same as increasing government spending by 10 b) affects real GDP more than increasing government spending by 10 c) affects real GDP less than increasing government spending by 10 d) affects real GDP but cannot be compared to government spending at allarrow_forwardAssume the following: • Tax Rate (T) = 0.25Y Consumption (C) = $150 +0.9(YT) • Investment (1) = $200 Government (G) = $100 Exports (X) = $500 Imports (M) = 0.15Y If investment increases from $200 to $300 by how much will aggregate expenditures increase? (Round your answer to a whole number) Provide your answer below:arrow_forwardYou are given data on the following variables in an economy: Item Value Government spending 300 Planned investment 200 Net exports 50 Autonomous taxes 250 Income tax rate 0.1 Marginal propensity to consume 0.5 Consumption (C) is 600 when income (Y) is equal to 1500. a. Solve for autonomous consumption and equilibrium level of output if there is an income tax t=0.2. b. In the economy with an income tax of 10%, what is the budget balance of the government? c. Briefly explain the function of the multiplier as part of Keynesianarrow_forward
- Problem 1 Suppose the system of aggregate expenditures can be described by the following relationships and parameter values. С (Y — Т) — 1200+ 0.8(Y — Т) I(r) = 100 – 3r G = 200 ; T = 200; r = 5; Ex = Im = 0 1. Suppose in response to the fall in Y, the Federal Reserve pursues a strategy to lower the real interest rate to 2 (note that it was 5 in the original setup to the problem). Identify two specific strategies or monetary policies the fed could employ to accomplish this new interest rate target.arrow_forwardConsider an economy in which autonomous consumption, planned autonomous investment, autonomous government expenditure, autonomous taxes, and the marginal propensity to consume are given (there are no net exports). Autonomous consumer spending = $3,000 Ip = $5,000 G = $3,000 T = $4,000 MPC = .75 (a) What is the level of C when Y = $19,000? I need help to know how to calculate this.arrow_forwardSuppose the consumption function is C= $400 billion + 0.9 Y and the government wants to stimulate the economy. By how much will aggregate demand at current prices shift initially (before multiplier effects) with Instructions: Enter your response as a whole number. (a) A $60 billion increase in government purchases? $ billion Instructions: Enter your responses rounded to one decimal place. (b) A $60 billion tax cut? $ billion (c) A $60 billion increase in income transfers? $ billion What will the cumulative AD shift be for (d) The increased government spending? $ billion (e) The tax cut? $ billionarrow_forward
- Question 8 Real GDP in the economy is $7,900 Billion and the Marginal Propensity to Consume is 0.56. What will Real GDP in the economy be, in $ Billions, after a $10 Billion increase in Government Spending? (Round your FINAL answer to the nearest whole number/integer.) (BE VERY CAREFUL NOT TO ROUND "MIDDLE" CALCULATIONS. ONLY ROUND THE FINAL ANSWER.) (Do not enter a dollar sign, $. or the word "Billion", just the number.)arrow_forwardQuestion: Given the following model for an economy C = 100 + 0.8Yd G = 800 T = 500 I = 200 a) Calculate the level of savings when the economy is in equilibrium. b) Find government spending multiplier. c) Find the new equilibrium level of output if the investment is increased by 100 (ΔI = 100). d) Find Tax multiplier. e) Find the new level of output if the lump-sum tax is increased by 100 (ΔT = 100). f) Find the new level of output if the government spending is increased by 100 and this government expenditure increase is financed by the same amount of increase in lump-sum taxes (ΔG = ΔT = 100).arrow_forwardSuppose the economy goes into a recession and private households wish to save more while businesses wish to invest less. Suppose that at the same time Congress wishes to 'get its fiscal house in order' and balance the federal budget. (Assume there is no foreign trade.) According to the lectures, which of the following is not possible. Households (in the aggregate) successfully save more than intended investment while the federal government successfully balances the budget. Increased leakages through savings and taxes, compounded by decreased government and investment spending, create a 'paradox of thrift' situation The government successfully balances the budget O Congress is surprised that higher taxes and lower outlays actually increased the federal deficit The private sector runs a 'surplus', saving more than it investsarrow_forward
- For the following problem, assume that the MPC, b, takes into account how much consumers spend as total income (Y) in the economy is changes. (Also: Hint GDP = Total Y) So we can rewrite our consumption function as :C= a +bYAssume:a= $2900 billionb=.75GDP= $9,000 billion.A) What is C=B) What is S=C) If consumers were the only ones buying goods in the economy, would the economy have an excess supply of goods, excess demand of goods or would the economy be at equilibrium ?arrow_forwardAssuming you are the Minister of Finance and Economic Planning for Nigeria, in charge of Fiscal Policy. The Research Director of the Ministry brought you the following data on Nigeria’s for the previous fiscal year, 2021. An examination of the data reveals that, during the fiscal year 2021, households in Nigeria saved 20% of their disposable income (Yd) and spent the rest on consumption. In addition, ₦5,000.00 was spent on Consumption expenditure (C), which is independent of income and Gross Private Investment (I) was ₦ 7,000.00. Total Government expenditure (G) which stood at ₦8,000.00 was supposed to be financed by a lump sum tax of ₦2,000.00 (independent of income) and a proportional tax rate of 25% of national income. Exports (X) stood at ₦2,500.00. In addition, the country’s import (M) during the previous fiscal year comprises of ₦1,000.00 which was independent of the country’s national income and 10% which was dependent of the country’s national income. Given these data on…arrow_forwardBackground: Between 2002 and 2003, the United States government increased its purchases on military goods and services by $10 billion for the war in Afghanistan. Economic theory suggests that this increase in government purchases would trigger a "multiplier effect,"causing an increase in real GDP that is greater than the $10 billion increase in government purchases. For simplicity, let's assume that there were no other spending changes in the economy. Suppose that the marginal propensity to consume in the United States is approximately 0.4, and real GDP in 2002 was $10 trillion, or $10,000 billion. When government purchases increased by $10 billion from 2002 to 2003, companies that manufactured military goods received an additional $10 billion in sales revenue, which ultimately became factor payments (income) to those who provided resources to those companies. These included the employees (who received wages and salaries), the shareholders (who received profits), those who supplied…arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education