Given situation: This case is relating to the concept of Gambling statutes. Contracts found violating a gambling statute are void. Insurance policies do not come under gambling laws except where the person taking the policy has no insurable interest in insuring the property or the individual. Given the element of chance involved in deciding the future price, so-called futures contracts are not considered gambling. To discuss: Decision for person B.

Question

Martha sells goods to James for $25,000. Martha assigns her right to receive the $25,000 to XYZ Finance James refuses to pay XYZ the $25,000. James makes two arguments for not paying. First James claims that XYZ has no privity of contract and that XYZ is not a third-party beneficiary of its contract with Martha. Second – James claims that the goods were worthless. Assume that the goods were worthless. You are the judge. Who wins and why? Address both arguments that James makes.

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 7Q

Summary Introduction

Given situation:

This case is relating to the concept of Gambling statutes. Contracts found violating a gambling statute are void. Insurance policies do not come under gambling laws except where the person taking the policy has no insurable interest in insuring the property or the individual. Given the element of chance involved in deciding the future price, so-called futures contracts are not considered gambling.

To discuss: Decision for person B.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Martha sells goods to James for $25,000. Martha assigns her right to receive the $25,000 to XYZ Finance James refuses to pay XYZ the $25,000. James makes two arguments for not paying. First James claims that XYZ has no privity of contract and that XYZ is not a third-party beneficiary of its contract with Martha. Second – James claims that the goods were worthless. Assume that the goods were worthless. You are the judge. Who wins and why? Address both arguments that James makes.

Granite Insurance Company entered into a treaty reinsurance agreement with Rock Solid Reinsurance (RSR). Granite's retention limit is $400,000 and RSR agreed to provide reinsurance for up to $2.0 million. If Granite writes an $800,000 policy, RSR is responsible for 50 percent of the losses. If Granite insures a $1.6 million risk, RSR is responsible for 75 percent of any losses. What type of reinsurance arrangement did Granite enter into with RSR? ما A) reinsurance pool B) surplus share reinsurance C) facultative reinsurance D) excess of loss reinsurance

Khalil bought Roots Café in New York from its previous owner. Khalil was eating a meal at Roots Café and mentioned to the owner that he would like to own a business of his own someday. The owner also had purchased the restaurant but was never able to make it a profitable business. The owner offered to sell Khalil Roots café. Khalil got a loan from a family member and was able to buy the company assets for $8,000 less than the seller's asking price. Through which of the following sources has Khalil found out that Roots Café was for sale? * Advertisement Hidden market A "for sale" sign Restaurant association