Introductory Statistics (2nd Edition)
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780321978271
Author: Robert Gould, Colleen N. Ryan
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Question
Chapter 12, Problem 26SE
a.
To determine
Identify whether the study is an observational or controlled experiment.
b.
To determine
Determine the group that did better.
c.
To determine
Identify the correct conclusion between the two given options.
d.
To determine
Explain the reason for choice in part c.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
In an observational study it was found that people who had received the flu shot this year had better blood pressure readings, on average, than people who did not. Can it be claimed that the flu shot is the cause of the lower overall blood pressure? Why or why not?
In a study of carbohydrate diet, an investigator wishes to test a hypothesis test for whether the population mean of cholesterol level among individuals taking medium carbohydrate
diet for 4 months is different than 7.8 mmol/L A simple random sample (SRS) of 30 study participants is conducted. Subjects are randomized to receive medium carbohydrate diet for
4 months. The total cholesterol level at the time of entering the study had an average of 5.20 mmol/L and standard deviation of 1.3 mmol/L
Calculate a 95% confidence interval (show your work) for the population mean of total cholesterol levels among those taking medium carbohydrate diet and use the confidence
interval to draw a conclusion as to whether there is a difference in cholesterol levels. Choose the correct statement.
O (4.7492, 5.6508) Do not reject HO sincc value of null hypothesis, 5.20 does fall in this range
O (4.8216. 5.5783) Reject H0 since value of null hypothesis 7.8 does not fall in this range.
O 14.7492. 5.6508)…
A clinical trial is being conducted to determine the efficacy of a novel antiretroviral medication for HIV patients. Patients are randomized to receive either standard antiretroviral therapy or the novel antiretroviral therapy and are followed for three months. The viral load, or the amount of HIV copies per milliliter of blood, is the most important outcome. Is there statistical evidence of a difference in viral load in patients receiving standard versus new anti-retroviral therapy? A total of 30 participants are randomized, and the data are shown below and it is Two tailed Test
Chapter 12 Solutions
Introductory Statistics (2nd Edition)
Ch. 12 - Dairy Products and Muscle The following two...Ch. 12 - Coffee and Depression The following two headlines...Ch. 12 - Prob. 3SECh. 12 - Prob. 4SECh. 12 - Prob. 5SECh. 12 - Prob. 6SECh. 12 - Niacin and Heart Disease The New England Journal...Ch. 12 - Prob. 8SECh. 12 - Prob. 9SECh. 12 - Prob. 10SE
Ch. 12 - Prob. 11SECh. 12 - Prob. 12SECh. 12 - Prob. 13SECh. 12 - Prob. 14SECh. 12 - Prob. 15SECh. 12 - Options on Global Warming People were asked...Ch. 12 - Prob. 17SECh. 12 - SAT Prep and Power Suppose an SAT tutoring company...Ch. 12 - Brain Games (Example 2) Researchers are interested...Ch. 12 - A Smile a Day Smiling is a sign of a good mood,...Ch. 12 - Swimsuits and Racing Speeds (Example 3) New, slick...Ch. 12 - Flu Vaccines and Age Suppose you want to compare...Ch. 12 - Preventing Heart Attacks with Aspirin Suppose that...Ch. 12 - Prob. 24SECh. 12 - Prob. 25SECh. 12 - Prob. 26SECh. 12 - Reading Colored Paper (Example 4) Some people...Ch. 12 - Prob. 28SECh. 12 - Prob. 29SECh. 12 - Prob. 30SECh. 12 - Prob. 31SECh. 12 - Prob. 32SECh. 12 - Prob. 33SECh. 12 - Prob. 34SECh. 12 - Prob. 35SECh. 12 - Prob. 36SECh. 12 - Prob. 37SECh. 12 - Prob. 38SECh. 12 - Prob. 39SECh. 12 - Prob. 40SECh. 12 - Prob. 41SECh. 12 - Prob. 42SECh. 12 - Prob. 43SECh. 12 - Prob. 44SECh. 12 - Prob. 45SECh. 12 - Prob. 46SECh. 12 - Prob. 47SECh. 12 - Prob. 48SECh. 12 - Prob. 49SECh. 12 - Prob. 50SECh. 12 - Alumni Donations The alumni office wishes to...Ch. 12 - Prob. 52SECh. 12 - Drug for Asthma (Example 7) Eosinophils are a form...Ch. 12 - Blood Sugar Refer to Exercise 12.50 on tight...Ch. 12 - Prob. 55SECh. 12 - Prob. 56SECh. 12 - Prob. 57CRECh. 12 - Prob. 58CRECh. 12 - Prob. 59CRECh. 12 - Prob. 60CRE
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- What is an experiment?arrow_forwardA clinical trial is planned to compare an experimental medication designed to lower blood pressure to a pla- cebo. Before starting the trial, a pilot study is conducted involving seven participants. The objective of the study is to assess how systolic blood pressure (SBP) changes over time if left untreated. SBP is measured at baseline and again 4 weeks later. Is there a statistically significant difference in SBP over time? Run the test at a 5% level of significance. Baseline 120 145 130 160 152 143 126 Four weeks 122 142 135 158 155 140 130 how do I solve this in excel?arrow_forwardPeople often wait till middle age to worry about having a healthy heart. However, recent studies have shown that earlier monitoring of risk factors such as blood pressure can be very beneficial (The Wall Street Journal, January 10, 2012). Having higher than normal blood pressure, a condition known as hypertension, is a major risk factor for heart disease. Suppose a large sample of individuals of various ages and gender was selected and that each individual’s blood pressure was measured to determine if they have hypertension. For the sample data, the following table shows the percentage of individuals with hypertension. Develop a side-by-side bar chart with age on the horizontal axis, the percentage of individuals with hypertension on the vertical axis, and side-by-side bars based on gender. What does the display you developed in part (a), indicate about hypertension and age? Comment on differences in gender. Age Male Female 20 - 34 11.0% 9.0% 35 – 44…arrow_forward
- A study was made of 413 children who were hospitalized as a result of motor vehicle crashes. Among 290 children who were not using seat belts, 60 were injured severely. Among 123 children using seat belts, 16 were injured severely (based on data from "Morbidity Among Pediatric Motor Vehicle Crash Victims: The Effectiveness of Seat Belts," by Osberg and Di Scala, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, No. 3). For this problem we want to know, is there sufficient sample evidence to conclude, at the 0.05 significance level, that the proportion of severe injuries is higher for children not wearing seat belts? Let pi be the proportion of severe injuries among all children not wearing seatbelts and who were involved in crashes. Let p2 be the proportion of severe injuries among all children wearing seatbelts and who were involved in crashes. Which is the proper expression of Ho? Pi = P2 O Pi P2 Which is the proper expression of H1? O pi P2 Calculate p1 to 4 decimal places: Calculate p,…arrow_forwardA randomized prospective study is conducted to estimate the association between taking a drug and remission for patients with a specific type of cancer. The estimated incidence rate ratio of remission for the treatment group relative to the placebo is 1.35. What is the proper interpretation of this value? An individual (from the same cancer population) who does not take the drug is 35% less likely to go into remission as compared to an individual who has taken the drug. O In a random sample of 1,000 persons from the same cancer population, there would be 350 more remissions if these 1,000 persons took the drug as compared to if they did not take the drug. O An individual (from the same cancer population) who takes the drug is 35% more likely to go into remission as compared to an individual who has not taken the drug. O In a random sample of 1,000 persons from the same cancer population, there would be 650 less remissions if these 1,000 persons took the drug as compared to if they did…arrow_forwardA randomized controlled trial is run to evaluate the effectiveness of a new drug for Parkinson’s Disease. A total of 100 individuals with Parkinson’s are randomized to either the new drug or placebo (50 per group). The outcome was measured using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Both groups had similar baseline scores. At the end of the trial, the mean UPDRS score of those assigned to the new drug was 55.7 with a standard deviation of 8.4. The mean score of those assigned to the placebo was 64.5 with a standard deviation of 6.3 years. Is there a statistically significant decrease in scores with the new treatment? Apply the two sample z test at a 5% level of significance. I am trying to figue out if this can be done in EXCEL, please provide details . I have the data analysis tool packarrow_forward
- Consider a proposed case-control study of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and maternal boba tea consumption in Irvine. Assume that 20% of Irvine mothers are regular consumers (at least 3 servings per week) of boba tea, and that the prevalence of ASD is 1/59 (making it a somewhat rare disease). Also assume that 50% of Irvine mothers who regularly consume boba tea prefer black milk tea, that the prevalence of regular boba tea consumption among mothers of autistic children is 25%, that each participant will be paid $30 to join the study, and that there are at least 1,000 mothers of autistic children and at least 100,000 mothers of non-autistic children in Irvine who are willing to participate in the study if compensated. If these assumptions are correct, what is the odds ratio describing the association between regular boba tea consumption and ASD? HINT: Recall that the disease odds ratio is equal to the exposure odds ratio.arrow_forwardA randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a new drug treatment on 500 patients with high blood pressure. The study randomly divided the patients into the drug treatment and placebo control groups and compared the average blood pressure after 2 months of treatment between the two groups. When the researchers looked at the results, they realized there was a potential problem. Although the new drug appeared to significantly lower the blood pressure compared to the control group, they also noticed that the average blood pressure of patients in the placebo control group prior to the study was significantly lower than patients in the treatment group prior to the study. If this is true, what impact could it have on the conclusions the researchers could draw? a. It wouldn't have an impact on the study result, because the study is already flawed as the patients are not representative of the whole population. b. It could bias the study results, making the…arrow_forward(True or False) A clinical trial is conducted to compare an experimental medication to placebo to reduce the symptoms of asthma. Two hundred participants are enrolled in the study and randomized to receive either the experimental medication or placebo. The primary outcome is self-reported reduction of symptoms. Among 50 participants who receive the experimental medication, 30 report a reduction of symptoms as compared to 15 participants of 50 assigned to the placebo. The 95% CI for the relative risk of participants reporting a reduction of symptoms between the experimental and placebo groups is between 1.529 and 8.012.arrow_forward
- Dark Chocolate for Good Health A study¹ examines chocolate's effects on blood vessel function in healthy people. In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 11 people received 46 grams (1.6 ounces) of dark chocolate (which is naturally flavonoid-rich) every day for two weeks, while a control group of 10 people received a placebo consisting of dark chocolate with low flavonoid content. Participants had their vascular health measured (by means of flow-mediated dilation) before and after the two-week study. The increase over the two-week period was measured, with larger numbers indicating greater vascular health. For the group getting the good dark chocolate, the mean increase was 1.3 with a standard deviation of 2.32, while the control group had a mean change of -0.96 with a standard deviation of 1.58. ¹Engler, M., et. al., "Flavonoid-rich dark chocolate improves endothelial function and increases plasma epicatechin concentrations in healthy adults," Journal of the…arrow_forwardFrom the abstract above, what is the relative risk of the primary endpoint of all- cause mortality in patients randomized to the Strongheart group compared to placebo group?arrow_forwardAn article in the Journal of the American Medical Association documents the results of a randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate whether the influenza vaccine is effective in reducing the occurrence of acute Otitis media (AOM) in young children. Acute otitis media is an infection that causes inflammation of the middle ear canal. In the study, children were randomized to receive either the influenza vaccine or a placebo. The children were followed for one year after randomization, and monitored for AOM during this period. 262 children were randomized to the vaccine group, and 150 of these children experienced at least one incident of AOM during the follow-up period. 134 children were randomized to the placebo group, and 83 of these children experience at least one incident of AOM during the follow-up period. Estimate a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of children experiencing at least one incident of AOM in the group that received the Influenza Vaccine.Estimate a 95%…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Hypothesis Testing using Confidence Interval Approach; Author: BUM2413 Applied Statistics UMP;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq1l3e9pLyY;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY
Hypothesis Testing - Difference of Two Means - Student's -Distribution & Normal Distribution; Author: The Organic Chemistry Tutor;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcZwyzwWU7o;License: Standard Youtube License