A person GP fraudulently told an undocumented immigrant that he knew immigration officials and could help him get lawful status. He asked for money in exchange for his help and was paid nearly &&#35;36;25,000 in the form of personal checks and wire transfers. The person GP had other individuals who made calls to the victim. They falsely represented themselves as agents with the U.S department of homeland security and asked for the continued payments. The person GP threatened the victim that he will contact the authorities and deport him along with his wife. In a federal district court, the person GP was convicted of wire fraud. The court stated that the person GP is a kind of person who can steal from anyone he comes in contact with. To find: The ethical state of the person GP as per his conduct.

Question

Patrick Clawson was described by reporter Karen Branch-Brioso in a newspaper story as a “1970s era St. Louis journalist turned private eye turned FBI informant.” The story was published in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. The fact that he had been characterized as an informant bothered Clawson, who saw it as damaging to his reputation. Accordingly, he brought a libel case against the Post-Dispatch. Recall that to be libelous, a statement must be false and “hold the victim up to ridicule, contempt, or hatred.” Clawson would have preferred the term whistleblower rather than informant because that term commands more respect. Why is the use of the term informant to describe Clawson not libelous?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 8BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A person GP fraudulently told an undocumented immigrant that he knew immigration officials and could help him get lawful status. He asked for money in exchange for his help and was paid nearly &#36;25,000 in the form of personal checks and wire transfers. The person GP had other individuals who made calls to the victim. They falsely represented themselves as agents with the U.S department of homeland security and asked for the continued payments. The person GP threatened the victim that he will contact the authorities and deport him along with his wife. In a federal district court, the person GP was convicted of wire fraud. The court stated that the person GP is a kind of person who can steal from anyone he comes in contact with.

To find: The ethical state of the person GP as per his conduct.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: A person GP fraudulently told an undocumented immigrant that he knew immigration officials and could help him get lawful status. He asked for money in exchange for his help and was paid nearly &#36;25,000 in the form of personal checks and wire transfers. The person GP had other individuals who made calls to the victim. They falsely represented themselves as agents with the U.S department of homeland security and asked for the continued payments. The person GP threatened the victim that he will contact the authorities and deport him along with his wife. In a federal district court, the person GP was convicted of wire fraud. The person GP’s attorney argued that the person GP’s ‘difficult personal times’ is partially responsible for his criminal background. However, the person GP was sentenced to forty-eight months of imprisonment, which was more than the federal sentencing guidelines.

To find: Whether the sentence of the court was too harsh or too lenient.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Patrick Clawson was described by reporter Karen Branch-Brioso in a newspaper story as a “1970s era St. Louis journalist turned private eye turned FBI informant.” The story was published in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. The fact that he had been characterized as an informant bothered Clawson, who saw it as damaging to his reputation. Accordingly, he brought a libel case against the Post-Dispatch. Recall that to be libelous, a statement must be false and “hold the victim up to ridicule, contempt, or hatred.” Clawson would have preferred the term whistleblower rather than informant because that term commands more respect. Why is the use of the term informant to describe Clawson not libelous?

18.6 Independent Contractor Yvonne Sanchez borrowed money from MBank to purchase an automobile. She gave MBank a security interest in the vehicle as collateral to secure the loan. When Sanchez defaulted on the loan, MBank hired El Paso Recovery Service, an independent contractor, to repossess the automobile. The two men from El Paso who were dispatched to Sanchez’s house found the car parked in the driveway and hooked it to a tow truck. Sanchez approached them and demanded that they cease their efforts and leave the premises, but the men nonetheless continued with the repossession. Before the men could tow the automobile into the street, Sanchez jumped into the car, locked the doors, and refused to leave. The men towed the car at a high rate of speed to the repossession yard. They parked the car in the fenced repossession yard, with Sanchez inside, and padlocked the gate. Sanchez was left in the repossession lot with a Doberman Pinscher guard dog loose in the yard. Later, she was…

Raoul was the vice president (VP) of sales and research at Whaddadeal Business Inc., where he often made very large contracts on behalf of the corporation. Whaddadeal has fired Raoul, and within 15 minutes of the termination - Raoul uses his special company provided Internet account as VP as well as other company provided electronics to leave a Whaddadeal Business Inc. "signature" for recipients of voice, data, or text: Raoul thus buys thousands of dollars of merchandise from one of Whaddadeal Business Inc.'s suppliers under the guise of still working for Whaddadeal Business Inc. When the supplier does not receive payment, she sues Whaddadeal Business Inc. Is it likely that the supplier will win the lawsuit? No, because a vice-president ordinarily does not have authority to act as an agent. O Yes, as a matter of respondeat superior. O Yes, because Whaddadeal Business Inc. has lingering authority. O No, because there was no actual authority. O Yes, due to apparent authority.