Microeconomics (7th Edition)
7th Edition
ISBN: 9780134737508
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 10, Problem 10.4.7PA
To determine
Endowment effect.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Alex, who was convinced that "Football is coming home", was very excited for the World Cup last year.
Unfortunately, he realized that his favourite Paul Gascoigne jersey from Euro 1996 was getting old, so
he wanted to buy a new one before England's first game the following week. He could either buy a 2014
James Milner shirt from retailer A, which would make him totally happy (utility=1), or a 2006 David
Beckham shirt from retailer B, which gives him a utility of 0.8. However, the shirts are not available
today. There is a 50% chance that retailer A will have the shirt on the week-end, and 70% chance that
retailer B will have theirs on the week-end. Due to time and work constraints, Alex can only visit one of
these retailers before the tournament starts, otherwise he will have to keep his old 1996 shirt, which
gives him a utility of 0.5.
He can also ask his friend Nathan to check both places in the morning. But being a Welsh supporter,
Nathan will not do it for free and wants some money…
Van has plans to go to an opera and already has a $100 nonrefundable, nonexchangeable, and nontransferable ticket. Now Amy, whom Van has wanted to date for a long time, asks him to a party. Van would prefer to go to the party with Amy and forgo the opera, but he doesn't want to waste the $100 he spent on the opera ticket.
From the perspective of an economist, if Van decides to go to the party with Amy, what has he just done?
1. Incorrectly allowed a sunk cost to influence his decision
2. Made a choice that was not optimal
3 Correctly ignored a sunk cost
Note:-
Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.
Answer completely.
You will get up vote for sure.
Donuts are a big thing in Portland, OR. You go into one of the many donut establishments to purchase some number of these tasty (and even vegan or gluten free if required) treats. Let's say that
the first donut has higher utility for you, so you are willing to pay up to $2 for it. For the second donut you are willing to pay $1.50, the third $1, a fourth $0.50 and the fifth $0.00. This particular
bakery in Portland charges an average of $1 per donut. If you are a rational buyer (which can be hard when faced with so many different delicious donuts) then how many donuts do you
purchase, and how much consumer surplus (i.e., money saved compared to what you were willing to spend) do you have?
O 4 donuts, $5
O 2 donuts, $5
O 3 donuts, $1.50
O 1 donut, $0.50
Chapter 10 Solutions
Microeconomics (7th Edition)
Ch. 10.A - Prob. 1RQCh. 10.A - Prob. 2RQCh. 10.A - Prob. 3RQCh. 10.A - Prob. 4PACh. 10.A - Prob. 5PACh. 10.A - Prob. 6PACh. 10.A - Prob. 7PACh. 10.A - Prob. 8PACh. 10.A - Prob. 9PACh. 10.A - Prob. 10PA
Ch. 10.A - Prob. 11PACh. 10.A - Prob. 12PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.1.1RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.1.2RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.1.3RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.1.4RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.1.5PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.1.6PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.1.7PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.1.8PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.1.9PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.1.10PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.1.11PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.1.12PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.2.1RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.2.2RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.2.3RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.2.4PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.2.5PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.2.6PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.2.7PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.2.8PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.2.9PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.2.10PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.2.11PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.3.1RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.3.2RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.3.3RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.3.4PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.3.5PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.3.6PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.3.7PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.3.8PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.3.9PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.1RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.2RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.3RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.4RQCh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.5PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.6PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.7PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.8PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.9PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.10PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.11PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.12PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.13PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.14PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.15PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.4.16PACh. 10 - Prob. 10.1CTECh. 10 - Prob. 10.2CTECh. 10 - Prob. 10.3CTE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Sean is arguing with his girlfriend, Yvette. They have been going out for a little more than two years. YVETTE: I'm leaving you, Sean. Get over it. SEAN: Are you saying that being single will make you happier than you've been with me? Speaking personally, I think the utility we've had in this relationship was much more than you could have had if you'd been single this whole time! YVETTE: I had taken an economics class and the word "utility" rings a bell. It's not that at all. We've had a fine time. It's that the utility I would get by continuing our relationship isn't worth it anymore. SEAN: I've never been dumped by someone citing the law of before. You're a piece of work, you know that? Yvette doesn't hear. She has already walked off, leaving Sean feeling like something of a sunk cost.arrow_forwardShen has plans to go to a movie and already has a $10 nonrefundable, nonexchangeable, and nontransferable ticket. Now Valerie, whom Shen has wanted to date for a long time, asks him to a party. Shen would prefer to go to the party with Valerie and forgo the movie, but he doesn't want to waste the $10 he spent on the movie ticket. From the perspective of an economist, if Shen decides to go to the party with Valerie, he has: Made a choice that was not optimal Incorrectly allowed a sunk cost to influence his decision Correctly ignored a sunk costarrow_forwardThe rules of politics are not always the same as the rules of economics. In discussions about setting budgets for government agencies, there is a strategy called “closing the Washington Monument.” When an agency faces the unwelcome prospect of a budget cut, it may decide to close a high-visibility attraction enjoyed by many people (like the Washington Monument). Explain in terms of diminishing marginal utility why the Washington Monument strategy is so misleading. Hint: If you are really trying to make the best of a budget cut, should you cut the items in your budget with the highest marginal utility or the lowest marginal utility? Does the Washington Monument strategy cut the items with the highest marginal utility or the lowest marginal utility?arrow_forward
- Assume you have your car broken down just before the weekend. You value your weekend trip as much as v and if you have to stay home you get the zero utility. There are two dealerships in your town. At the beginning of the day they simultaneously choose a price for repair. Dealers know that when you come to one of them and observe the price, you can always call to another dealer to make an inquiry about his price. The call is costless. The other dealer, however, can be occupied for this day. Assume, this happens with probability a which is a common knowledge (but the dealers do not know whether the other dealer is occupied or not). Assume zero repair cost for the dealer and find a symmetric equilibrium of the game.arrow_forwardStyles In an auction, potential buyers compete for a good by submitting bids. Adam Gallinsky, a social scientist from NWU, compared eBay auctions in which the same good was sold. He found on average that, the higher the number of bidders the higher the sales price. For example, in two separate auctions of identical IPods, the one with the higher number of bidders brought the higher sales price. According to Gallinsky, this explains why smart sellers set absurdly low opening prices (the lowest price the seller will accept), such as 1 cent for a new IPod. Use the concept of consumer and producer surplus to explain this reasoning.arrow_forwardSuppose you observe a person's answer to two decision problems. Problem 1: You are offered $40 today. What is the minimum amount x you demand one month from today in order to be willing to give up the $40 now? Answer: x = 52. Problem 2: Your are offered $40 today. What is the minimum amount x you demand one year from today in order to be willing to give up the $40 now? Answer: $60. 1. Demonstrate that the rational model of time preferences is violated for this choice pattern. 2. Derive this individual's B and d for the hyperbolic time discounting model. 3. Suppose the utility you get from eating ice cream now is 10 utils. But you pay a cost of -4 utils per hour for the next 4 hours, because it gives you indigestion and makes you feel lethargic. If your hourly B and d for this problem are B = .6 and d = .9, ... 1. What is the total discounted utility of eating ice cream now? 2. What is your total discounted utility now of planning to eat ice cream after lunch tomorrow? 3. Do you eat ice…arrow_forward
- As we learned in the video, Sheldon is trying to decide between purchasing an XBox and purchasing a PlayStation. Each system has its pros and cons. Sheldon is willing to pay up to $300 for the XBox, which costs $249. He is willing to pay up to $500 for the PlayStation, which costs $499. Regardless of which game system he buys, Sheldon plans to purchase a third-party warranty for $20. Let's calculate Sheldon's opportunity cost of purchasing each system. V 3rd attempt Part 1 What is Sheldon's opportunity cost if he buys the XBox? $ Part 2 What is Sheldon's opportunity cost if he buys the PlayStation? $ See Hint See Hintarrow_forwardYou have two options for how to spend the afternoon. You can either go see a movie with your roommate or work as a tutor for the Math Department. From experience, you know that going to see a movie gives you $20 worth of enjoyment, and with your student discount, a movie ticket only costs $12. If you spend the afternoon working as a math tutor, you will get paid $45. On a typical day, you wouldn't be willing to spend the afternoon working as a math tutor for less than $35. What is your opportunity cost of seeing a movie this afternoon? Select one: O a. $57 O b. $12 ○ c. $22 ○ d. $8arrow_forwardWhen consumers have a budget, their utility is maximized by buying a combination of goods such that the marginal utility per dollar is the same for all of these goods. This is because if this were not the case, it would mean that the consumer hadn't used up their entire budget. of their insatiability. if a consumer could get higher marginal utility from one good than from others, they would want to buy more of that good, and less of others. if a consumer could get higher marginal utility from one good than from others, they would want to buy less of that good, and more of others. it guarantees them some variety.arrow_forward
- Anon is a graduate student at Lock Haven University studying human behavior. Three subjects, Felicity, Terrance, and Lola, listed their utility for pineapple and watermelon. Anon believes he will be able to tell which subject likes pineapple the most by referring to the levels of utility each one reported. His adviser, Dr. Util, tells him his research is flawed. Explain why Dr. Util feels this way.arrow_forwardOn Sunday afternoon, you have arrived for brunch, where you can choose from only two types of dishes: snacks for $3 and drinks for $2. You have to spend $10, otherwise the money will disappear. Complete the tables below. Include the whole procedure and formulas. Explain what combination of dishes would give you the greatest total utility. why?arrow_forwardOn your way home from Super Groceries, your car breaks down. It is a hot summer day and you have nobody to call. With little time before the food spoils, you decide to prioritize what to carry on the walk home. You choose to take three items with you. Since you will need all five items today, you will replace the two abandoned items at the corner store near your house, Convenient Grocers. The table contains the prices you paid for each good at Super Groceries and the prices you will need to pay at Convenient Grocers to replace the goods. Which three items should you save? OOOOO vegetables fruits eggs ham milk Item milk eggs ham vegetables fruits Price at Super Groceries $3.75 $3.80 $2.95 $3.80 $2.50 Price at Convenient Grocers $4.25 $2.95 $5.25 $3.05 $3.80arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education