Enron and Arthur Andersen UP
Enron was an energy comp any based in Houston, Texas, that made energy trades. It was formed in 1985 with the merger of Houston Natural Gas and lnterNorth. After an aggressive expansion plan that involved risky financing transactions outside the original, fundamental business model of the company, Enron was billions of dollars in debt. Enron concealed this debt through hidden transactions with related-party
One of the reasons that Enron was able to get away with the fraud for some rime was because of a low-quality audit by its external audit firm, Arthur Andersen. Prior to the failure of Enron in 2001, Arthur Andersen had been involved in two other major audit failures. These failed audits, related to frauds at Waste Management (1996) and Sunbeam (1997), should have raised red flags for management and any outside observers that some of the audit firm’s internal quality assurance processes were not working. When the federal government uncovered Enron’s fraud along with the string of poor quality audits at Arthur Andersen, the government forced the audit firm out of business.
Internal documentation at Arthur Andersen showed that there were conflicts between the auditors and the audit committee of Enron, and that even though there were many individuals concerned about the accounting and disclosure practices at Enron, nothing was done by Andersen to report these problems. In fact, the leading partner on the audit, David Duncan, actively worked to ensure that Enron’s fraudulent financial reporting went uncovered. It appears that Duncan was motivated by the fact that Arthur Andersen was earning enormous consulting fees on the Enron engagement; Enron was a hugely important client for him personally and for the Houston office of Arthur Andersen. Together, these conflicts of interest clouded his independent judgment and professional skepticism.
Around the time that Enron declared bankruptcy in late 2001, Arthur Andersen personnel in the Houston office began aggressively destroying documentation relating to the Enron engagement. This action enabled the federal government to file charges against Arthur Andersen that ultimately led to the downfall of the audit firm. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted partially in response to the Enron fraud and the revelation of the poor audit conducted by Arthur Andersen, which is why this case is of particular historical relevance. Considering these facts, answer the following questions:
a. Members of Enron management were the individuals who perpetrated the financial statement fraud, this, why do you think the auditors were held responsible when they are not the ones actually making the fraudulent
b. Explain why the consulting fees and importance of Enron to David Duncan and the Houston office of Arthur Andersen might have affected Duncan’s independence, and thus the quality of the audits he supervised.
c. Describe the likely users of Enron’s audited financial statements. How were these various user groups likely affected by the fraud?
d. How might the sequential list of frauds perpetrated by Arthur Andersen client (Wage Management, Sunbeam, and finally Enron) have affected the decision by the SEC and federal prosecutors to aggressively seek Arthur Andersen’s legal demise?
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 1 Solutions
ACP AUDITING - RISK BASED APPROACH
- Jane Ellerby and Sam Callison are discussing the recent fraud that occurred at LowRental Leasing, Inc. The fraud involved the improper reporting of revenue to ensure that the company would have income in excess of $1 million. What is fraudulent financial reporting, and how does it differ from an embezzlement of company funds?arrow_forwardKPMG LLP served as the external auditor for some of the largest subprimemortgage lenders in the U.S. leading up to and during the housingmarket crisis of the mid to late-2000s. The audits of two of theirlargest lending clients, New Century Financial Corporation and Countrywide,ultimately led the firm to settle litigation charges in 2010 for$44.7 and $24 million, respectively. The business model of these twosubprime mortgage lenders consisted of providing loans to borrowerswith weak credit histories. The business model had begun to fail during2007, when the economy weakened, borrowers began defaulting, andhome prices declined drastically. New Century filed for bankruptcy andCountrywide was purchased by Bank of America, which subsequentlysuffered massive losses related to business failures at Countrywide.Just before the housing crash of 2007 put the companies in severefinancial crises, KPMG had given both companies unqualified auditopinions.In both cases, KPMG was subsequently accused of…arrow_forwardABC Corporation (the "Company") incurred heavy losses over the past 10 years resulting in deficit and liquidity problems. The Company considers borrowing from different banks as a way to produce more funds for the company to continue operation and possibly, recover from losses. However, banks are afraid to grant loans to the Company due to recent issues with fraudulent issuance of financial statements by the companies just to obtain loans.In line with the above scenario, what good corporate governance practices may be implemented by the company to increase the confidence of banks (lenders) and avoid the high probability of issuing misstated financial statements by the company? - Have an independent external audit - Require internal audit to conduct examination/audit of Company’s FS - Have the financial statements certified by BIR, Management, and SEC before submission to Banks - Increase integrity and loyalty of BODarrow_forward
- e. Of the following, the most significant risk factor relating to the risk of misstatement arising from fraudulent financial reporting for SSC is that: Multiple Choice Company officers serve on the board of directors. The company must refinance a significant portion of its debt. The company operates in the Bisbee, Arizona, area. The company paid no dividend this year. Untitled docume...pdf Untitled docume....pdf docx Presentation se....pdf Untitled docume...pdf 身arrow_forwardA company has an agreement with a bondholder that prevents it from selling several of its coal-fired power plants. However, recent regulatory changes have made these plants less profitable and the value of the firm is falling. Which of the following is this agreement called? Collateral trust Lien Indenture Debenturearrow_forwardIn a huge fraud scandal, CEO and CFO stole $150 million and inflated the company income by$500 million. A general ledger clerk was also implicated in the scheme. It was reported that they siphoned money through unapproved loans and fraudulent stock sales. Money was smuggled out of company disguised as executive bonuses or benefits. The reason cited by the perpetrators was that they needed money to pay off some gambling debts.In addition, they also stated that they worked long and hard hours at the company without being properly compensated or recognized. Upon investigating, the auditors found that the fraud had taken place on two levels. The auditors documented in their report that all the three factors of fraud were present. In addition, the auditors found that the company’s control systems deviated from the COSO framework. You are required to: a. IDENTIFY and EXPLAIN the TWO (2) levels of fraud that the auditors found. b. Making reference to the case, IDENTIFY and EXPLAIN…arrow_forward
- The following paragraphs describe fraudulent accounting committed by the company Rite-Aid in 1999. After reading the paragraphs, list the journal entries you think Rite-Aid would have used to do what is described here. You will have to make an educated guess as to what journal entries the company would use to cover up the fraud. In the fourth quarter of FY 1999, Rite Aid prematurely recognized $17 million relating to a litigation settlement with a vendor. Rite Aid should not have recognized this sum in that period because the settlement offer was expressly contingent upon the execution of a formal settlement agreement which did not take place until May 20, 1999. Moreover, the litigation settlement was also contingent upon the execution of a purchasing agreement that was not finalized until May 18, 1999. Both of these contingencies were expressly stated in the February 26, 1999 letter of intent signed by Grass.arrow_forwardThe Steinhoff saga, possibly the biggest case of corporate fraud in South African business history,has dominated financial and general news since the company’s share price collapsed on5 December 2017.The reality is that it seems as though the crisis at Steinhoff is more than an overstatement of incomeand asset values which has triggered a liquidity and credit crunch. It is about the collapse ofcorporate governance and great levels of unethical business leadership.Required: Do some research and explain why it is important for businesses to have ethical standards and codes of conduct for financial managers. Include another example where poor ethical practices by people in a management or trustposition have led to significant losses.arrow_forwardSeveral years ago, Prudential Securities was charged with fraud for late trading. This was the first major brokerage house to be charged with the illegal practice of buying mutual funds after hours. The regulators who accused Prudential Securities charged them with carrying out a large-scale, late-trading scheme that involved more than 1,212 trades that were valued at a remarkable $162.4 million. These trades were placed after hours in order to benefit favored hedge funds. The complaint did not contain information regarding any profits that were protected by the scandal. The regulators who accused Prudential stated that Prudential should have noticed the considerable number of trades that were being placed after 4 p.m. and should have begun an internal inquiry. However, the complaint stated that Prudential possessed “no internal supervisory procedures” to detect trades placed after hours. Market timing, often done in conjunction with late trading, involves rapid in and out…arrow_forward
- In the 1990s, GEC was a major UK company, specializing mainly as a defense contractor. It had a reputation as a risk-averse company with a large cash pile. In 1996 a new chief executive led the board into a major change in the company’s strategy. GEC sold off its defense interests and switched its business into telecommunications, mainly in the USA, buying large quantities of telecommunications assets. The company also changed its name to Marconi. A number of factors, including a huge over-capacity in network supply, led to a collapse in the market for telecommunications equipment in 2001. Many of Marconi’s competitors saw the downturn coming, but Marconi did not. It assumed, incorrectly, the market downturn would be brief and there would soon be recovery and growth. Within a year loss of shareholder confidence resulted in a collapse in the Marconi share price, reducing the value of its equity from about £35 billion to just £800 million. In July 2001, the company asked for trading in…arrow_forwardThe Beyond the Page feature, “Goldman Sachs Causes a Ruckus,” describes the controversial involvement of Goldman Sachs in a mortgage-backed securities deal in 2006. When this involvement was revealed, the market value of Goldman Sachs' common stock fell overnight by $10 billion. This was far more than any fine that might have been imposed. Explain.arrow_forwardAssume in the DigitPrint case that the venture capitalists do not provide additional financing to the company, even though the accrued expense adjustments have not been made. The company hires an audit firm to conduct an audit of its financial statements to take to a local bank for a loan. The auditors become aware of the unrecorded $1 million in accrued expenses. Liza Doolittle pressures them to delay recording the expenses until after the loan is secured. The auditors do not know whether Henry Higgins is aware of all the facts. Identify the stakeholders in this case. What alternatives are available to the auditors? Use the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and Josephson’s Six Pillars of Character to evaluate the ethics of the alternative courses of action.arrow_forward
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College PubAuditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage LearningIndividual Income TaxesAccountingISBN:9780357109731Author:HoffmanPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT