The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305967304
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 1, Problem 3BS
Summary Introduction
Case Summary: The doctrine of stare decisis is one of the most followed common law in English as well as American jurisdiction.
To Explain: Meaning of stare decisis and the reason why this doctrine has been important in the development of legal traditions.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Does the concept of judicial interpretation of the law mean that judges can make whatever law they wish? And, how can courts remain flexible, if they are required to follow precedent?
Discuss why the legal system in the United States ensures that federal law preempts state law. What are the advantages of having one set of laws, such as federal law, above all others? Does this infringe upon the states' rights to govern their citizens? Even if the federal constitution should preempt all other laws, should federal statutes preempt state constitutions? Why/why not?
Should U.S. courts, and in particular the United States Supreme Court look to the laws of other nations for guidance when deciding important issues, including those involving rights granted by the Constitution? If so, what impact might this have on their decisions? Please explain.
Chapter 1 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Please defend your position on the following statement: “The Statute of Frauds is old law that has outlived its usefulness and should be abandoned by today’s courts.” Be sure to state your position and support it with at least THREE points. pls note this is business law question!arrow_forwardLawsuits always originate in Florida's District Courts of Appeal. True or Falsearrow_forwardState any two courts in Ghana which are known as lower courts?arrow_forward
- BUSINESS LAW 3 - David Ungar holds a Dunkin’ Donut's franchise. The terms of his franchise agreement require him to use only those ingredients furnished by Dunkin’ Donuts. He is also required to buy its napkins, cups, and so on, with the Dunkin’ Donut's trademark on them. Is this an illegal tying arrangement? What if Dunkin’ Donuts maintains that it needs these requirements to maintain its quality levels on a nationwide basis? [Ungar v. Dunkin’ Donuts of America, Inc., 429 U.S 5 - Hines Cosmetic Co. sold beauty preparations nationally to beauty shops at a standard or fixed- price schedule. Some of the shops were also supplied with a free demonstrator and free advertising materials. The shops that were not supplied with them claimed that giving the free services and materials constituted unlawful price discrimination. Hines replied that there was no price discrimination because it charged everyone the same. What it was giving free was merely a promotional campaign that was not…arrow_forwardwhats the difference between statutory law and case lawarrow_forwardWhat is the Criminal Court of the City of New York?arrow_forward
- Please discuss how Congressional enumerated powers relate to implied powers and the necessary and proper clause. In doing so. please define each power explain how they are related and give one concrete example of how they were/are constitutionally used togetherarrow_forwardYou may have seen the very popular Broadway show or movie Les Misérables, based on Victor Hugo’s epic nineteenthcentury French novel of the same name. The main character, Jean Valjean, steals a loaf of bread to feed his sister’sstarving family and is arrested and sent to prison. If we apply conventional reasoning and principles of law to his crime,Valjean genuinely is guilty as charged and we do not need to consider any extenuating circumstances. However, in aKantian ethical framework, we would take into account Valjean’s motives as well as his duty to treat his sister’s family asends in themselves who deserve to live. Valjean’s fate demonstrates what might occur when there is a gap between thelegal and the moral. Clearly, Valjean broke the law by stealing the bread. However, he acted morally by correcting awrong and possibly saving human lives. According to Kantian ethics, Valjean may have been ethical in stealing bread forhis family, particularly because the action was grounded in…arrow_forwardPlease explain the differences between public and private law. Also discuss the types?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning