Concept explainers
Anton van Leeuwenhoek made an important contribution to the development of the cell theory. How?
a. He articulated that all organisms are made of cells.
b. He articulated that all cells come from preexisting cells.
c. He invented the first microscope and saw the first cell.
d. He invented more powerful microscopes and was the first to describe the diversity of cells.
Introduction:
The fundamental theory underlying the structural unit of life is known as cell theory. The cell theory is able to explain the structural unit, which is common in all the living organisms. The microscope development led to decoding the mystery about the fundamental unit and it confirmed that all the organisms are made up of cells. Anton van Leeuwenhoek was the first scientist to observe and describe the diversity of cells, such as blood cells, microscopic nematodes, and sperm cells.
Answer to Problem 1TYK
Correct answer:
Anton van Leeuwenhoek invented more powerful microscope and was the first to describe the diversity of cells. The efficient use of advanced magnification techniques, Anton van Leeuwenhoek observed the different type of cells.
Explanation of Solution
Explanation/Justification for the correct answer:
Option (d) is given as invention of the powerful microscope helped in describing the diversity of the cells. Anton van Leeuwenhoek was the first scientist who observes and describes the diversity of cells, such as blood cells, microscopic nematodes, and sperm cells. The magnifying power of microscopes was modified which resulted in the development of more powerful microscopes. Anton van Leeuwenhoek modified the magnifying power of microscopes, resulting in the invention of more powerful microscopes with magnification up to 300×. He was the first to observe the single-celled organisms and called them “animalcules”. Hence, Option (d) is correct.
Explanation for incorrect answers:
Option (a) is given as organisms made up of cells as an articulation. The claim was not just given by this scientist, rather a collective effort of scientists revealed that cells are the basic unit of all organism. So, it is a wrong answer.
Option (b) is given as the articulation that all cells have come from preexisting cells. This hypothesis was proposed by German scientist Rudolph Virchow. So, it is a wrong answer.
Option (c) is given as he invented the first microscope and observed by first cell Anton Van Leeuwenhoek. The first cell was observed by scientist Robert Hooke. So, it is a wrong answer.
In 1839, Schleiden & Schwann formally articulated that all organisms are composed of cells. A German scientist named Rudolph Virchow proposed that all cells arise from cells already in existence. Robert Hooke invented a microscope to examine the structure of cork from an oak tree. Leeuwenhoek further develop more powerful microscopes with magnification up to 300 ×; “×” refers to magnification power. Hence, the options (a), (b) and (c) are incorrect.
Anton van Leeuwenhoek made an important contribution to the development of the cell theory by inventing more powerful microscopes and was the first to describe the diversity of cells.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 1 Solutions
Biological Science
- Based on your results, which suspect's DNA best matches the DNA found at the crime scene?arrow_forwardIn oxidase test with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the cell cultures on the slide turn colorless to be purple after tetra-methyl-p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (TMPD) is added. In the reaction, OTMPD is electron acceptor O cytochrome c is the electron source oxygen is terminal electron acceptor OH2 produced is electron donorarrow_forwardYou will use the following scenario to answer a group of 5 questions. You have isolated a microbe from an environmental sample. The microbe has the ability to perform a new metabolic reaction at a very low temperature, so you are excited that it could be a new species. You have shipped your samples off for sequencing and are now waiting for the results. Out of curiosity (and maybe boredom...) you decide to test your culture for the Catalase and Oxidase enzymes. Upon testing your sample for catalase, you don't see any bubbles; however, you do see a color change to purple during the Oxidase test. What results can you conclude from this? O Catalase-/ Oxidase + O Catalase +/ Oxidase + Catalase + / Oxidase- O Catalase / Oxidase - O None of the abovearrow_forward
- Which of the following is not a strength of using 16S rRNA for phylogenetic analyses? OA. It's cheap OB. It's easy to do C. It can be used to identify all the way down to the strain level OD. Both A & B OE. None of the abovearrow_forwardWhy are molecular approaches important to the field of microbial taxonomy and phylogeny? Phylogenetic inferences based on molecular approaches provide the most robust analysis of microbial evolution currently available. It allows for the collection of a large and accurate dataset from many organisms Almost no fossil record was left by microbes when compared to plants and animals All of the above None of the abovearrow_forwardYou will use the following scenario to answer a group of 5 questions. You have isolated a microbe from an environmental sample. The microbe has the ability to perform a new metabolic reaction at a very low temperature, so you are excited that it could be a new species. You have already cultured it and gone through the plate isolation procedure. Before you ship your samples off for sequencing, you want to do one final check of the A260 ratios. You get back the following ratios: A260/280 ratio is 1.89; A260/230 is 2.01. These ratios are close enough to the accepted "pure" values so they could be considered "pure" and mostly (if not completely) free of contaminants from the PCR process. True Falsearrow_forward
- You will use the following scenario to answer a group of 5 questions. You have isolated a microbe from an environmental sample. The microbe has the ability to perform a new metabolic reaction at a very low temperature, so you are excited that it could be a new species. After receiving your sequence back from the sequencing lab, you feel that you have, in fact, discovered and isolated a new species. You ask a fellow labmate about how you should proceed, and he tells you the following is the proper way to introduce a new species for recognition: Cultures have to be sent to international culture collections. Then a paper must be published describing the new organism and providing a genus and species name. You recall learning about this in your Microbiology course in college. Is this information from your colleague true or false? True Falsearrow_forwardis often a good indication of phylogenetic relatedness in phenotypes. Life-cycle patterns Cleavage patterns O Gene expression O Morphological similarityarrow_forwardWhich of the following is a weakness of using 16S rRNA for phylogenetic analyses? It can only go down to the family and genus levels It takes months to complete O Both of the above O None of the abovearrow_forward
- An unrooted tree containing ten unrelated species can become rooted by adding a descendant group related to two of the species. an unrelated outgroup. O a distantly related outgroup. O a descendant related to only one of the species.arrow_forwardWhat is the most appropriate purpose of building a phylogenetic tree? They look awesome You can use a tree to compare morphological characteristics of organisms It can be used to establish and analyze evolutionary relationships between species All of the abovearrow_forwardWhich of the following sequencing techniques can identify down to the strain level? O Multilocus sequence typing Genomic fingerprinting Whole genome sequencing OSNP analysis All of the abovearrow_forward