Essentials of Corporate Finance (Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series in Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate)
9th Edition
ISBN: 9781259277214
Author: Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 1, Problem 1.14CTCR
Summary Introduction
To think critically about: Whether the compensation to the top managers is higher.
Introduction:
The managers will often have an important economic incentive to maximize the value of shares. Commonly, the first incentive is that the managerial compensation is often tied to the financial performance in common to offer share value.
The second incentive the managers relate to the prospects of the job is to promote the top performers in the firm.
Statement:
Person MF, a Chief Executive Officer in Company MG earned $89 million in the year 2014.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The issue of the size of executive compensation packages is explored in the text. The highest paid CEO in 2014 was David Zaslav, the CEO of Discovery Communications, whose total executive compensation package was $156.1 million, the vast majority of which was from stock awards. Critics claim that CEOs receive excessive executive compensation packages when compared with the average worker. Consider that NBA basketball star LeBron James took in $64.8 million in 2014, the majority of which was from endorsements, while radio and TV entertainer Howard Stern earned $95 million? Are the top paid corporate executives overpaid when compared to top entertainers? Why or why not?
Many financial managers and corporate officers are often criticized for (a) poor decisions, (b) lack of ethical behavior, (c) large salaries, (d) lucrative severance packagesworth millions of dollars, and (e) extravagant lifestyles. Is this criticism justified? Justify your opinion.
Consider again Milton Friedman’s article.
1. What does Friedman mean by “ethical custom”?
2. If the laws of the society are limiting the company’s profitability, would the company be within its rights to disobey the law?
3. What if the law is “on the books,” but the company could count on a lack of enforcement from state officials who were overworked and underpaid? Should the company limit its profits? Suppose that it could save money by discharging a pollutant into a nearby river, adversely affecting fish and, potentially, drinking water supplies for downstream municipalities. In polluting against laws that aren’t enforced, is it still acting “within the rules of the game”? What if almost all other companies in the industry were saving money by doing similar acts?
Chapter 1 Solutions
Essentials of Corporate Finance (Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series in Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate)
Ch. 1.1 - What are the major areas in finance?Ch. 1.1 - Prob. 1.1BCQCh. 1.2 - What is the capital budgeting decision?Ch. 1.2 - What do you call the specific mixture of long-term...Ch. 1.2 - Prob. 1.2CCQCh. 1.3 - Prob. 1.3ACQCh. 1.3 - Prob. 1.3BCQCh. 1.3 - Prob. 1.3CCQCh. 1.3 - Prob. 1.3DCQCh. 1.4 - Prob. 1.4ACQ
Ch. 1.4 - What are some shortcomings of the goal of profit...Ch. 1.5 - Prob. 1.5ACQCh. 1.5 - Prob. 1.5BCQCh. 1.5 - What incentives do managers in large corporations...Ch. 1.6 - What is a dealer market? How do dealer and auction...Ch. 1.6 - Prob. 1.6BCQCh. 1.6 - What does OTC stand for? What is the large OTC...Ch. 1 - Prob. 1.2CCh. 1 - Prob. 1.3CCh. 1 - Prob. 1.4CCh. 1 - Who are the stakeholders in a firm?Ch. 1 - What are the defining features of a primary...Ch. 1 - Prob. 1.1CTCRCh. 1 - Prob. 1.2CTCRCh. 1 - Prob. 1.3CTCRCh. 1 - Prob. 1.4CTCRCh. 1 - Prob. 1.5CTCRCh. 1 - Prob. 1.6CTCRCh. 1 - Primary versus Secondary Markets. Youve probably...Ch. 1 - Auction versus Dealer Markets. What does it mean...Ch. 1 - Prob. 1.9CTCRCh. 1 - Prob. 1.10CTCRCh. 1 - Prob. 1.11CTCRCh. 1 - Prob. 1.12CTCRCh. 1 - Prob. 1.13CTCRCh. 1 - Prob. 1.14CTCRCh. 1 - Prob. 1.15CTCRCh. 1 - The McGee Cake Company In early 2010, Doc and Lyn...Ch. 1 - The McGee Cake Company In early 2010, Doc and Lyn...Ch. 1 - The McGee Cake Company In early 2010, Doc and Lyn...
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Several managers in your company are experiencingpersonal financial problems and have asked that yourcompany switch from LIFO to FIFO so that they canreceive bigger bonuses, which are tied to the company’snet income. How would you respond to this request if youwere the company’s chief financial officer (CFO)? Wouldsuch a switch help the managers? Who could it hurt?arrow_forwardIn a strategy meeting, the president of a manufacturing company said, “If we were to raise the price of our product, the company’s break-even point would be lower.” The vice-president of finance responded by saying, “Then we should raise our price. The company will be less likely to incur a loss.” Do you agree with the president? Why/why not? Do you agree with the vice president? Why/why not?arrow_forwardCEO: "If we were to increase the price of our goods the company's break-even point would be lower," he noted in a strategy meeting. The vice president of finance answered by adding, "Then we should boost our pricing. As a result, the organization is less likely to suffer a financial loss." Do you share the president's sentiments? To what end? Is the vice president correct? To what end?arrow_forward
- In a strategy meeting, the computer manufacturing company's president said, "If we raised the price of our product, the company's break-even point will be lower." The financial vice president responded by saying, "The company will also be less likely to incur a loss." As a management accountant would you agree or disagree with these statements and why?arrow_forwardNancy John, a bright, female investment analyst about to give a major presentation to a group of bankers supporting a corporate acquisition. After walking in and meeting the bankers before you give the presentation, you're asked by your boss to "be a dear and serve them coffee." Imagine the insult and awkwardness of such a situation-what do you do? Do you carry through with the task, sacrificing your dignity or doing something wrong because you can't afford to lose the job? Or do you speak up? A group of Swiss occupational health researchers have recently started a program of research on illegitimate tasks, or tasks that violate "norms about what can reasonably be expected from a given person" in a job. Question: 1. What do you think of this situation? 2. What might cause supervisors and managers within organizations to allocate these kinds of tasks? 3. Can you explain it based on 'positive reinforcement' behavior and suggest some suggestion?arrow_forwardWhich of the following would be best considered to be an agency conflict problem in the behavior of the following financial managers? pack to later. O A. Bill chooses to pursue a risky investment for the company's funds because his compensation will substantially rise if it succeeds. O B. Sue instructs her staff to skip safety inspections in one of the company's factories, knowing that it will likely fail the inspection and incur significant costs to fix. OC. Michael chooses to enhance his firm's reputation at some cost to its shareholders by sponsoring a team of athletes for the Olympics. O D. James ignores an opportunity for his company to invest in a new drug to fight Alzheimer's disease, judging the drug's chances of succeeding as low. stv MacBook Air DII DD 888 F9 20 F7 F8 F6 F5 F4 esc F2 F3 F1 &arrow_forward
- Karen Johnson, CFO for Raucous Roasters (RR), a specialty coffee manufacturer, is rethinking her company’s working capital policy in light of a recent scare she faced when RR’s corporate banker, citing a nationwide credit crunch, balked at renewing RR’s line of credit. Had the line of credit not been renewed, RR would not have been able to make payroll, potentially forcing the company out of business. Although the line of credit was ultimately renewed, the scare has forced Johnson to examine carefully each component of RR’s working capital to make sure it is needed, with the goal of determining whether the line of credit can be eliminated entirely. In addition to (possibly) freeing RR from the need for a line of credit, Johnson is well aware that reducing working capital will improve free cash flow. Historically, RR has done little to examine working capital, mainly because of poor communication among business functions. In the past, the production manager resisted Johnson’s efforts to question his holdings of raw materials, the marketing manager resisted questions about finished goods, the sales staff resisted questions about credit policy (which affects accounts receivable), and the treasurer did not want to talk about the cash and securities balances. However, with the recent credit scare, this resistance has become unacceptable and Johnson has undertaken a company-wide examination of cash, marketable securities, inventory, and accounts receivable levels. Johnson also knows that decisions about working capital cannot be made in a vacuum. For example, if inventories could be lowered without adversely affecting operations, then less capital would be required, and free cash flow would increase. However, lower raw materials inventories might lead to production slowdowns and higher costs, and lower finished goods inventories might lead to stockouts and loss of sales. So, before inventories are changed, it will be necessary to study operating as well as financial effects. The situation is the same with regard to cash and receivables. Johnson has begun her investigation by collecting the ratios shown here. (The partial cash budget shown after the ratios is used later in this mini case.) Johnson plans to use the preceding ratios as the starting point for discussions with RR’s operating team. Based on the data, does RR seem to be following a relaxed, moderate, or restricted current asset usage policy?arrow_forwardYou are a member of the board of directors of a small manufacturing firm. The firm is about to hire a new CEO and is discussing the compensation package that will be offered. A salary of $350,000 has already been settled, but the board is uncertain how to structure the bonus. The proposal that has gained the most support is to pay a bonus based on some percentage of operating income. Some of the board members believe that the bonus should be based on absorption costing operating income while others think that variable costing operating income should be used. Which option do you support? State clearly why this option is best.arrow_forwardMr. Coco Knot is a company accountant and is confused about the ethical conduct that should be followed by him as he is facing a particular dilemma. Please explain to him what he should do and give justifications. ‘My company turns a blind eye to fiddling expenses’ - Coco Knot THE DILEMMA I am a company accountant and I feel uncomfortable that my company seems to turn a blind eye to some employees fiddling expenses. I raised it initially with the employees and then with the financial director, who said that she would rather not confront the employees as they are high-performing sales executives.arrow_forward
- Penco Ltd’s board of directors are looking into expanding the company’s business operations. Before investing in a new product, the board conducted one focus group, and based on this one bit of feedback, invested $5m of company funds to develop the product. Within two years, the company had lost $8m due to poor sales. Shareholders are furious and wish to hold directors personally liable for this loss. Analyse the likely outcome for directors if shareholders were to accuse the board of breaching CA s 180.arrow_forward“Too big to fail” was a common buzz phrase during the Great Recession. The idea behind it is that certain businesses are so important to an economy that disastrous consequences would result if they were allowed to fail and so government intervention is necessary. How is the concept of moral hazard relevant here?arrow_forwardConsider the following conversation between Gary Means, manager of a division that produces industrial machinery, and his controller, Donna Simpson, a certified management accountant and certified public accountant: Gary: Donna, we have a real problem. Our operating cash is too low, and we are in desperate need of a loan. As you know, our financial position is marginal, and we need to show as much income as possibleand our assets need bolstering as well. Donna: I understand the problem, but I dont see what can be done at this point. This is the last week of the fiscal year, and it looks like well report income just slightly above breakeven. Gary: I know all this. What we need is some creative accounting. I have an idea that might help us, and I wanted to see if you would go along with it. We have 200 partially finished machines in process, about 20% complete. That compares with the 1,000 units that we completed and sold during the year. When you computed the per-unit cost, you used 1,040 equivalent units, giving us a manufacturing cost of 1,500 per unit. That per-unit cost gives us cost of goods sold equal to 1.5 million and ending work in process worth 60,000. The presence of the work in process gives us a chance to improve our financial position. If we report the units in work in process as 80% complete, this will increase our equivalent units to 1,160. This, in turn, will decrease our unit cost to about 1,345 and cost of goods sold to 1.345 million. The value of our work in process will increase to 215,200. With those financial stats, the loan would be a cinch. Donna: Gary, I dont know. What youre suggesting is risky. It wouldnt take much auditing skill to catch this one. Gary: You dont have to worry about that. The auditors wont be here for at least 6 to 8 more weeks. By that time, we can have those partially completed units completed and sold. I can bury the labor cost by having some of our more loyal workers work overtime for some bonuses. The overtime will never be reported. And, as you know, bonuses come out of the corporate budget and are assigned to overheadnext years overhead. Donna, this will work. If we look good and get the loan to boot, corporate headquarters will treat us well. If we dont do this, we could lose our jobs. Required: 1. Should Donna agree to Garys proposal? Why or why not? To assist in deciding, review the corporate code of ethics standards described in Chapter 1. Do any apply? 2. Assume that Donna refuses to cooperate and that Gary accepts this decision and drops the matter. Does Donna have any obligation to report the divisional managers behavior to a superior? Explain. 3. Assume that Donna refuses to cooperate; however, Gary insists that the changes be made. Now what should she do? What would you do? 4. Suppose that Donna is 63 and that the prospects for employment elsewhere are bleak. Assume again that Gary insists that the changes be made. Donna also knows that his supervisor, the owner of the company, is his father-in-law. Under these circumstances, would your recommendations for Donna differ?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:Cengage
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage Learning
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337485913
Author:BROOKS
Publisher:Cengage
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337115773
Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. Heitger
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...
Finance
ISBN:9781337395083
Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves
Publisher:Cengage Learning