You have been asked to evaluate two alternatives, X and Y, that may increase plant capacity for manufacturing high-pressure hydraulic hoses. The parameters associated with each alternative have been estimated. Which one should be selected on the basis of a present worth comparison at an interest rate of 10% per year? Why is yours the correct choice? Alternative First Cost Maintenance cost, per Year Salvage Value Life X $-25,000 $-8000 $1,000 5 years Y $-55,000 $-2000 $2,000 5 years and that of alternative Y is $ The present worth of alternative X is ${ Alternativ (Click to selectis selected by the company.

You have been asked to evaluate two alternatives, X and Y, that may increase plant capacity for manufacturing high-pressure hydraulic hoses. The parameters associated with each alternative have been estimated. Which one should be selected on the basis of a present worth comparison at an interest rate of 10% per year? Why is yours the correct choice? Alternative First Cost Maintenance cost, per Year Salvage Value Life X $-25,000 $-8000 $1,000 5 years Y $-55,000 $-2000 $2,000 5 years and that of alternative Y is $ The present worth of alternative X is ${ Alternativ (Click to selectis selected by the company.

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter5: The Time Value Of Money

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

You have been asked to evaluate two alternatives, X and Y, that may increase plant capacity for manufacturing high-pressure hydraulic hoses. The parameters associated with each alternative have been estimated. Which one should be selected on the basis of a present worth comparison at an interest rate of 14% per year? Why is yours the correct choice? X $-40,000 $-12000 $1,500 5 years The present worth of alternative X is $ Alternative (Click to select) is selected by the company. Alternative First Cost Maintenance cost, per Year Salvage Value Life Y $-60,000 $-2000 $2,500 5 years and that of alternative Y is $
You have been asked to evaluate two alternatives, X and Y, that may increase plant capacity for manufacturing high-pressure hydraulic hoses. The parameters associated with each alternative have been estimated. Which one should be selected on the basis of a present worth comparison at an interest rate of 13% per year? Why is yours the correct choice? Alternative First Cost X $-45,000 Maintenance cost, per $-9000 Year Salvage Value $1,000 Life 5 years Y $-55,000 $-4000 $6,500 5 years The present worth of alternative X is $ 13888 and that of alternative Y is $ 44459.4 Alternative X is selected by the company.
Two copier machines can be used for fast printing. Which machine should be selected on the basis of a present worth analysis using the LCM, at an interest rate of 10% per year? Answer the below questions to select the best Option. Machine A 1.116,334 Machine B 598,852 First cost,$ Annual operating cost, S per year 65,061 32,000 Savage value, S Update cost at year 2, $ ife, years 80,000 130,000 15,000 8. PW for Process A=
A company has a choice between two machines with identical production capacity but different costs. Use incremental rate of return analysis to determine which machine should be selected if the MARR is 8% per year. (Show you calculation process and make sure to indicate which machine should be selected). A B Initial cost $100 Annual benefit $20 Useful life (years) 10 $50 $12 10
The costs associated with manufacturing a multifunction portable gas analyzer are estimated. At an interest rate of 8% per year and a present worth analysis, which method should be selected?
Zandri Industries is evaluating whether to invest in solar panels to provide some of the electrical needs of its main office building in Buffalo, New York. The solar panel project would cost $475,000 and would provide cost savings in its utility bills of $45,000 per year. It is anticipated that the solar panels would have a life of 15 years and would have no residual value. (Click the icon to view the present value factor table.) (Click the icon to view the present value annuity factor table.). (Click the icon to view the future value factor table.) (Click the icon to view the future value annuity factor Read the requirements. table.) Requirement 1. Calculate the payback period in years of the solar panel project. Determine the formula, then calcuste the payback period. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) Initial investment Expected annual net cash inflow Payback period %3D %24 475,000 $4 45,000 10.56 years Requirement 2. If the company uses a discount rate of 10%, what is the…
EVALUATION o Given the following mutually-exclusive alternatives and a Minimum Attractive Rate of Return (MARR) of 7%, which should be chosen? o Solve as PV, FV and AW (3 separate analyses for each Design) and show which Design gets chosen in each. SHOW YOUR WORK (including cash flow diagram) with tool formulas, not tables at this time to ensure you're understanding the concepts. Year 0 1 23 4 5 Total Design A ($2500) $0 $0 $0 $0 $3100 $600 Design B ($2700) $650 $650 $650 $650 $700 $600 Design C ($3000) $250 $500 $750 $1000 $1250 $750
REQUIRED Study the information given below and calculate the following: Payback period (in years, months and days) Net Present Value Internal Rate of Return (expressed to two decimal places). (Note: Your answer must include the interpolation.) information Eva Limited is considering the purchase of a machine. The company desires a minimum required rate of return of 12%. The machine will cost R2 200 000 plus installation costs of R200 000 and is expected to have a useful life of six years. It is anticipated that the machine will have a salvage value of R100 000. The machine is expected to increase revenues by R800 000 per year but will require the employment of two new machine operators at R100 000 per year for each operator, and it will also require maintenance and repairs averaging R50 000 per year. Depreciation is estimated to be R400 000 per year.
3. Use Expected NPVand PVR analysis for a minimum rate of return of 20.0% to evaluate the economic potential of buying and developing the rights to a new process with the following estimated costs, revenues, and success probabilities. The process rights would cost $100,000 at time zero, and it is considered 100% certain that an experimental development pilot plan work will be done one year later for a cost of $500,000. There is a 60.0% probability that the experimental development results will look good enough to take the project to production for a $400,000 capital cost at year one. If the experimental development results are unsatisfactory, a pilot plan abandonment cost of $40,000 will be incurred at year 1. If the project is taken to production, it is estimated there will be a 50.0% probability of generating production that will give $450,000 per year net positive cash flow for years 2 through 10, a 35.0% probability of generating $300,000 per year net positive cash flow for years 2…
Suppose a project with a 6% discount rate yields R5000 for the next three years. Annual operating costs amount to R1000 for each year, and the one time initial investment cost is R8000. a. Calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) of this project.b. Calculate the cost-benefit ratio for the project. c. Is the project acceptable? Motivate your answer.
Assume that a company is considering purchasing a machine for $50,500 that will have a five-year useful life and no salvage value. The machine will lower operating costs by $17,000 per year. The company's required rate of return is 18%. The profitability index for this investment is closest to: Click here to view Exhibit 14B-1 and Exhibit 14B-2, to determine the appropriate discount factor(s) using the tables provided. Multiple Choice C O 0.95. 1.01. 1.05. 1.11.
Gina Ripley, president of Dearing Company, is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The annual net cash benefits and savings associated with the system are described as follows: The system will cost 9,000,000 and last 10 years. The companys cost of capital is 12 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the payback period for the system. Assume that the company has a policy of only accepting projects with a payback of five years or less. Would the system be acquired? 2. Calculate the NPV and IRR for the project. Should the system be purchasedeven if it does not meet the payback criterion? 3. The project manager reviewed the projected cash flows and pointed out that two items had been missed. First, the system would have a salvage value, net of any tax effects, of 1,000,000 at the end of 10 years. Second, the increased quality and delivery performance would allow the company to increase its market share by 20 percent. This would produce an additional annual net benefit of 300,000. Recalculate the payback period, NPV, and IRR given this new information. (For the IRR computation, initially ignore salvage value.) Does the decision change? Suppose that the salvage value is only half what is projected. Does this make a difference in the outcome? Does salvage value have any real bearing on the companys decision?