A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9780134753119
Author: Sheldon Ross
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
You calculate a
There is not enough information in this question to provide an answer. |
||
The more of this fruit you eat, the lower your blood cholesterol will be. |
||
There is no correlation between eating this fruit and having a particular level of blood cholesterol. |
||
The more of this fruit you eat, the higher your blood cholesterol will be. |
||
There is a correlation between eating this fruit and having a particular blood cholesterol, but the value of 0.8 is too low to draw any conclusions. |
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, probability and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- A survey was taken in 2018 that asked people about their saving habits. Researchers wanted to know if people who saved more also spent less. The scatterplot below shows their results when comparing two variables: the amount people reported that they put into savings each month, and the amount they reported that they spent on clothes. The researchers found the correlation coefficient for this data to be -0.239. Which of the following is true about these variables? a. There is no relationship between savings and money spent on clothes each month.b. There is a weak, positive linear relationship between savings and money spent on clothes each month.c. There is a perfect, negative linear relationship between savings and money spent on clothes each month.d. There is a weak, negative linear relationship between savings and money spent on clothes each month.arrow_forwardA random sample of college students was surveyed about how they spend their time each week. The scatterplot below displays the relationship between the number of hours each student typically works per week at a part- or full-time job and the number of hours of television each student typically watches per week. The correlation between these variables is r = –0.63, and the equation we would use to predict hours spent watching TV based on hours spent working is as follows: Predicted hours spent watching TV = 17.21 – 0.23(hours spent working) Since we are using hours spent working to help us predict hours spent watching TV, we’d call hours spent working a(n) __________________ variable and hours spent watching TV a(n) __________________ variable. The correlation coefficient, along with what we see in the scatterplot, tells us that the relationship between the variables has a direction that is _________________ and a strength that is ______________________. According to the…arrow_forwardA negative correlation indicates that as the values of one variable increase, the values of a second variable decrease. O True O Falsearrow_forward
- What is another possible explanation for this correlational relationship? Since this is just a correlation, we can’t be sure if age causes changes in your field goal percentage. So, what is one possible other explanation that you can come up with for the correlation that you calculated (hint: think about possible "third variable" explanations for this correlation---what other variables or factors might be causing changes in both x and y that could explain this correlation?).arrow_forwardThe older that an adult tends to be before deciding to get married, the longer the person's marriage tends to last. What type of correlation exists between age of marriage and the number of years the marriage lasts? A. positive B. negativearrow_forwardThe results from a research study indicate that adolescents who watch more violent content on television also tend to engage in more violent behavior than their peers. The correlation between amount of TV violent content and amount of violent behavior is an example of Question 25 options: a positive correlation a negative correlation a correlation near zero a correlation near onearrow_forward
- Define and distinguish among positive correlation, negative correlation, and no correlation. How do we determine the strength of a correlation? A. positive correlation means that both variables tend to increase (or decrease) together B. positive correlation means that two variables tend to change in opposite directions, with one increasing all the other decreases. C. positive correlation means that there is no apparent relationship between the two variables. D. positive correlation means that there is a good relationship between the two variables. arrow_forwardAs temperature decreases, rates of crime also seem to decrease. Which of the following Pearsons R values represents the strongest possible correlation between these two variables?" -0.5 -1 0.5 1arrow_forward4. Put the r-values in order from the weakest to strongest correlation. r = -0.90 r = 0.050 r = 0.80 r = -0.72 r= 0.45 r= -0.88 r = 0.97arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)ProbabilityISBN:9780134753119Author:Sheldon RossPublisher:PEARSON
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
Probability
ISBN:9780134753119
Author:Sheldon Ross
Publisher:PEARSON