Y = -1.04+0.24X₁-0.27X₂ where Y = quarterly sales (in thousands of cases) of the cold remedy X₁ = Cascade's quarterly advertising (x $1,000) for the cold remedy X₂ = competitors' advertising for similar products (x $10,000) Here is additional information concerning the regression model: 8b1 = 0.052, 862 = 0.080, R² = 0.640, s 1.63, F-statistic = 31.402, and Durbin-Watson (d) statistic = 0.499. Which of the independent variables (if any) appears to be statistically significant (at the 0.05 level) in explaining sales of the remedy? (Hint: to.05/2,33-2.042.) Check all that apply. O X₁ OX₂ What proportion of the total variation in sales is explained by the regression equation? O 0.640 O 0.080 O 0.132 O 0.052 The given F-value shows that you reject the null hypothesis that neither of the independent variables explains a significant (at the 0.05 level) proportion of the variation in income. (Hint: F0.05,2,33-2-F3.316.)

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
14th Edition
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Chapter4: Estimating Demand
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 4E
icon
Related questions
Question
Y-1.04 +0.24X₁-0.27X2
where
Y = quarterly sales (in thousands of cases) of the cold remedy
X₁ = Cascade's quarterly advertising (x $1,000) for the cold remedy
X₂= competitors' advertising for similar products (x $10,000)
Here is additional information concerning the regression model:
8b1 = 0.052, 862 = 0.080, R² = 0.640, 8e-1.63, F-statistic=31.402, and Durbin-Watson (d) statistic=0.499.
Which of the independent variables (if any) appears to be statistically significant (at the 0.05 level) in explaining sales of the
remedy? (Hint: to.05/2,33-32.042.) Check all that apply.
□ X₁
OX2
What proportion of the total variation in sales is explained by the regression equation?
0.640
0.080
O 0.132
O 0.052
The given F-value shows that you
reject the null hypothesis that neither of the independent variables explains a
significant (at the 0.05 level) proportion of the variation in income. (Hint: Fo.05,2,33-2-F3.316.)
Transcribed Image Text:Y-1.04 +0.24X₁-0.27X2 where Y = quarterly sales (in thousands of cases) of the cold remedy X₁ = Cascade's quarterly advertising (x $1,000) for the cold remedy X₂= competitors' advertising for similar products (x $10,000) Here is additional information concerning the regression model: 8b1 = 0.052, 862 = 0.080, R² = 0.640, 8e-1.63, F-statistic=31.402, and Durbin-Watson (d) statistic=0.499. Which of the independent variables (if any) appears to be statistically significant (at the 0.05 level) in explaining sales of the remedy? (Hint: to.05/2,33-32.042.) Check all that apply. □ X₁ OX2 What proportion of the total variation in sales is explained by the regression equation? 0.640 0.080 O 0.132 O 0.052 The given F-value shows that you reject the null hypothesis that neither of the independent variables explains a significant (at the 0.05 level) proportion of the variation in income. (Hint: Fo.05,2,33-2-F3.316.)
where
Y = quarterly sales (in thousands of cases) of the cold remedy
X₁ Cascade's quarterly advertising (x $1,000) for the cold remedy
X2 competitors' advertising for similar products (x $10,000)
=
Here is additional information concerning the regression model:
$61 0.052, 862=0.080, R2 = 0.640, 8= 1.63, F-statistic 31.402, and Durbin-Watson (d) statistic = 0.499.
-
Which of the independent variables (if any) appears to be statistically significant (at the 0.05 level)'in explaining sales of the cold
remedy? (Hint: to.05/2,33-3 2.042.) Check all that apply.
O X₁
X₂
What proportion of the total variation in sales is explained by the regression equation?
O 0.640
O 0.080
O 0.132
0.052
reject the null hypothesis that neither of the independent variables explains a
The given F-value shows that you.
sinnificant fat the 0.05 level) proportion of the variation in income. (Hint: Fo.05,2,33-2- 3.316.)
Transcribed Image Text:where Y = quarterly sales (in thousands of cases) of the cold remedy X₁ Cascade's quarterly advertising (x $1,000) for the cold remedy X2 competitors' advertising for similar products (x $10,000) = Here is additional information concerning the regression model: $61 0.052, 862=0.080, R2 = 0.640, 8= 1.63, F-statistic 31.402, and Durbin-Watson (d) statistic = 0.499. - Which of the independent variables (if any) appears to be statistically significant (at the 0.05 level)'in explaining sales of the cold remedy? (Hint: to.05/2,33-3 2.042.) Check all that apply. O X₁ X₂ What proportion of the total variation in sales is explained by the regression equation? O 0.640 O 0.080 O 0.132 0.052 reject the null hypothesis that neither of the independent variables explains a The given F-value shows that you. sinnificant fat the 0.05 level) proportion of the variation in income. (Hint: Fo.05,2,33-2- 3.316.)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 17 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Regression Model
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning