Write a program in some language that has both static and stackdynamic local variables in subprograms. Create six large (at least 100 * 100) matrices in the subprogram—three static and three stack dynamic. Fill two of the static matrices and two of the stack-dynamic matrices with random numbers in the range of 1 to 100. The code in the subprogram must perform a large number of matrix multiplication operations on the static matrices and time the process. Then it must repeat this with the stack-dynamic matrices. Compare and explain the results.

Do it in C++

Write a C++ program that fills a 5 x 5 matrix of integers. The matrix must be a static matrix; its size must be fixed at compile-time. Display the contents of the matrix. Query the user for an integer. Pass the matrix and the integer to a bool function that searches for the first occurrence, and only the first occurrence, of the integer in thematrix. If the integer is found, the function returns true (and passes back the row and column coordinates of the first occurrence of the integer); if not, the function returns false. Main then displays whether the integer was found in the matrix and if so, the coordinates of the first occurrence. The use of a break to exit a loop or a function should be avoided. My code does not find the location of the first occurrence and does not use a bool function. Can you please help me to find the error. This is my code: #include <iostream> #include <random> using namespace std; int main() { int guess, array[5][5]; bool found = false; for(int…

Write a c++ code that compare the times to traverse a list (containing a large number of elements) implemented in an array, in a simple linked list, and in an unrolled linked list. In this experiment, you need to generate a large list, store it in each representation, and then measure the time to traverse the list in each representation. For the array, this is almost straightforward: Fill the array and then do a sequential scan. Here is the thing to watch for: When you fill the array, it all gets read into cache. So, somehow you need to ensure that almost all of the array is NOT in cache before you do your traversal.  One thing you can do is make your array big enough that most of it will not fit in cache at once.  You need to make sure that the node capacity is not too small, or it will behave too much like a simple linked list.