William Green, vice president of manufacturing for computer products (CPC), and his staff are studying three midwestern alternative locations for a new production facility for producing high-resolution scanners. His staff analysts predict that the scanners will be a growing market over the next ten years, and the analyst's group shares marketing's enthusiasm for planning facilities for producing this new product line. The analysts have developed these estimates for the three locations; In what range of production volume would each of the locations be preferred (at the minimum cost)?     Variable cost locations Annual Fixed costs per scanner Cleveland, Ohio $390,000 $34 South Bend, Indiana $360,000 $37 Grand Rapids, Michigan $310,000 $40

Metro has initiated discussions on attracting rail service. A depot would need to be constructed, which would require $2.5million in land and $7.5 million in construction costs. Annual operating and maintenance costs (O&M) for the facility would be $150,000, and personnel costs would be an additional $110,000. Other assorted costs would be born by the railroad and federal authorities. Annual benefits (B) of the rail service are estimated as listed: $120,000 for Railroad annual payments, $25,000 for Rail tax charged to passengers, $20,000 for Convenience benefits to local residents, and $12,000 for Additional tourism dollars for Metro. Apply the B-C ratio method, with a MARR of 8% per year and 20 year study period, to determine if the rail service should be established. a. BC ratio=2.12, good project b. BC ratio=-1.76, good project c. BC ratio=1.69, good project d. BC ratio=0.14, not good project

The Giant Farmer Company processes food for sale in discount food stores. It has two plants: one in Chicago and one in Houston. The company also operates warehouses in Miami, Florida; Denver, Colorado; Lincoln, Nebraska; and Jackson, Mississippi. Forecasts indicate that demand soon will exceed supply and that a new plant with a capacity of 8,000 cases per week is needed. The question is where to locate the new plant. Three potential sites are Buffalo, Atlanta, and Memphis. The two tables below give data on capacities, forecasted demand, and shipping costs that have been gathered. Plant Chicago Houston Capacity (cases per week) New plant Warehouse Plant Chicago Houston Buffalo (alternative 1) Atlanta (alternative 2) Memphis (alternative 3) For each alternative new plant location, determine the total cost of the shipping pattern that will minimize total transportation costs. Where should the new plant be located? If the new plant is located in Buffalo, the optimal cost is $ (Enter your…

Problem 8-10 Factor Initial cost Traffic Maintenance Dock space Neighborhood Location East #1 East #2 West Weight East #1 100 60 20 24 15 0 00 00 N West East #1 East #2 8 8 4 4 2 East #2 110 35 25 24 9 a. Using the above factor ratings, calculate the composite score for each location. West 110 35 Composite Score 25 13 11 b. Determine which location has the highest composite score:

Describe Strategic Importance of Location Decisions?

Marilyn Helm Retailers is attempting to decide on a location for a new retail outlet. At the moment, the firm has three alternatives: stay where it is but enlarge the facility; locate along the main street in nearby Newbury; or locate in a new shopping mall in Hyde Park. The company has selected the four factors listed in the following table as the basis for evaluation and has assigned weights as shown: Factor Description Hyde Park Factor Weight Present Newbury Location 1 Average community 0.30 40 60 50 income Community growth potential 2 0.15 20 20 80 Availability of public transportation 0.20 30 60 50 Labor availability, attitude, and cost 4 0.35 80 50 50 a) Based on the given information, the best location for Marilyn Helm Retailers is to open the new retail outlet in with a total weighted score of 3.