Which one of the following statements is correct? 1)A supergame must have a unique subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. 2)A supergame can only have finite number of subgame perfect Nash equilibrium points. 3)A supergame cannot have any subgame perfect Nash equilibrium 4)None of the above is correct.

Show that there does not exist a pure-strategy perfect Bayesian equilibrium in the following extensive-form game. What is the mixed- strategy perfect Bayesian equilibrium? R Player 1 M L Player 2 3

Identify a real-world situation in which you see game theory/strategic behavior in action. Explain the game: Who are the players ? What are the strategies they have at their disposal? How are payoffs determined? What, if any, is the Nash equilibrium? Note, this article from Up Journey might help you come up with an example: https://upjourney.com/game-theory-examples-in-real-life

For problem 1 and 2, consider the following game : с D A (0,5) (5,-5) B (3, 1) (1, 0) 1. Show that the game above doesn't have a pure Nash equilibrium. 2. Show that the game above has a unique mixed Nash equilibrium, and describe the playing strategy.

Player 2 Middle Left P1: $45 P1: $70 Up P2: $45 P2: $50 Player 1 P1: $50 P1: $60 Middle P2: $50 P2: $60 P1: $60 P1: $50 Down P2: $60 P2: $70 In the game shown above, list all of the Nash Equilibrium (please check ALL that apply) (up, left) (up, middle) (up, right) (middle, left) (middle, middle) (middle, right) (down, left) (down, middle) (down, right) No equilibrium Right P1: $45 P2: $60 P1: $50 P2: $70 P1: $60 P2: $60

Explain the difference between a Bayesian-Nash Equilibrium and a Nash Equilibrium.

In the sequential games such as the sequential Battle of the Sexes, why does the Nash equilibrium allow for outcomes with noncredible threats?

Using game theory what are some examples in where Nash equilibrium is incorporated?

help please answer in text form with proper workings and explanation for each and every part and steps with concept and introduction no AI no copy paste remember answer must be in proper format with all working

Player 2 Left P1: $40 Player 1 Up P2: $0 P1: $44 Down P2:$44 In the game shown above, list all of the EFFICIENT Nash Equilibrium (please check ALL that apply) (up, left) (up, right) (down, left) (down, right) No efficient Nash Equilibrium Right P1:$1 P2: $1 P1: $0 P2: $40