Which of the following statements is the best description of a Nash equilibrium? Select one: O a.An equilibrium outcome achieved by cooperation between players in the game O b. An outcome that is achieved when players in the game have jointly maximized profits and divided those profits according to market share of each player c. An outcome where each player's strategy depends on the behaviour of its opponents d. An outcome where each player's best strategy is to maintain its present behaviour given the present behaviour of the other players

Which of the following statements is the best description of a Nash equilibrium? Select one: O a.An equilibrium outcome achieved by cooperation between players in the game O b. An outcome that is achieved when players in the game have jointly maximized profits and divided those profits according to market share of each player c. An outcome where each player's strategy depends on the behaviour of its opponents d. An outcome where each player's best strategy is to maintain its present behaviour given the present behaviour of the other players

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What is the Nash Equilibrium in a game?A. A situation where all players cooperate for maximum gainB. A situation where no player can improve their outcome by changing their strategy unilaterallyC. A situation where players always choose the same strategyD. A situation where players randomly select strategies
Consider the following price game: Firm 1 Firm 2 High Low High 20, 20 12, 24 Low 24, 12 14, 14 Remark: In simultaneous move games (games with rows and columns) theconvention is to write the row player’s payoff first and the column player’spayoff second. (a) What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? Recall that for each playeryou should find the best response to each of the opponents’ strategies andunderline the associated payoff. Then look for a cell where both strategiesare best responses to each other. This is a Nash equilibrium. (b) Does either firm have a dominate strategy (a strategy that is always abest response)?
Aedri Quick Lesson in Game Theory A Nash Equilibrium is an outcome in which neither player is better off by changing their strategy. 2.7 Is a Dominant Strategy equilibrium also a Nash equilibrium? a) Yes b) No esc The Ice Cream Guys $3.99 $4.99 + Chucky's Chunky CCT: $20,000 $3.99 ICG: $20,000 CCT: $60,000 ICG: $10,000 tab Treats CCT: $10,000 $4.99 ICG: $60,000 CCT: $40,000 ICG: $40,000 The table above is the payoff matrix for the annual profit of the only two ice-cream-truck firms operating in Beach City. They are deciding the price of an ice cream cone. %3D caps lo 2.8 What is Chucky's dominant strategy? a) $3.99 b) $4.99 c) Not enough information hift 2.9 What is the dominant strategy equilibrium in this situation? a) Both charge $3.99 b) Both charge $4.99 c) CCT charges $3.99 and ICG charges $4.99 d) CCT charges $4.99 and ICG charges $3.99 2.10 Suppose these two firms engaged in collusion (which, of course, totally doesn't happen because it is against the law). Which outcome would…
The payoff matrix below describes a one-shot game in which two farmers ("Player A" and "Player B") choose between planting corn or planting wheat. The payoffs in this matrix represent thousands of dollars of income, so more is better. Pla yer A Plant Corn Plant Wheat What kind of equilibrium is this? Plant Corn Dominant Strategy Equilibrium Nash equilibrium 3, 3 Player B 5,0 Both a Nash and a Dominant Strategy Equilibrium O No equilibrium Plant Wheat 0,5 1, 1
Consider the following classic game, called Hawk and Dove. Player 2 Hawk Dove Hewk 0,0 4,1 Player 1 Dove 1,4 33 Select all pure strategy Nash equilibria and check the corresponding option if you think there exists a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium too. O There exists also a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium OHawk, Dove ODove, Hawk O Hawk, Hawk O Hawk, Hawk
20.38 C 1 Search il 4G O Microeconom... 1. In the sequential games such as the sequential Battle of the Sexes, why does the Nash equilibrium allow for outcomes with noncredible threats? 2. Left Right Up 1, 3 3, 1 Down 2, 2 4, 4 a. Find the Nash equilibrium or equilibria b. Which player, if any, has a dominant strategy? c. Does A benefit from changing the game by reducing his or her payoff in this way? 3. Noah and Xaviera love to play "Hide and Seek." It is a simple game, but it continues to amuse. It goes like this. Xaviera hides upstairs or downstairs. Noah can look upstairs or downstairs but not in both places. If he finds Xaviera, Noah gets one scoop of ice cream and Xaviera gets none. If he does not find Xaviera, Xaviera gets one scoop of ice cream and Noah gets none. a. Fill in the payoffs in the matrix below! Is this a zero-sum game? What are the Nash equilibria in pure strategies? Hide and Seek Xaviera Upstairs Downstairs Upstairs Noah Downstairs b. Find a Nash equilibrium in…
What term refers to the optimal action that a player can take, regardless of the opponents' actions? Oa Nash strategy a payoff strategy a cooperative strategy a dominant strategy