Which of the following is not a criticism of utilitarian reasoning? It is consistent with decisions that seriously harm a small minority to bring about happiness for a large majority. It is consistent with decisions that violate human rights. It is consistent with decisions that violate important moral principles. It is consistent with decisions that bring about the unhappiness of the majority.

Utilitarian reasoning is an ethical approach that determines whether the actions are ethical or not…

Answered: Which of the following is not a…

Understanding Business

12th Edition

ISBN:9781259929434

Author:William Nickels

Publisher:William Nickels

Chapter1: Taking Risks And Making Profits Within The Dynamic Business Environment

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Explain the theories with examples. 1. Egoism theory 2. Social group relativism theory 3. Cultural relativism theory 4. Utilitarianism theory 5. Deontology theory
How does the law and sports legislation help to ensure that performers are protected during sporting contests?
I am currently taking Justice Adminstration: Police, Courts, and Corrections, and I'm having a hard time creating any educational opinion. I just have a hard time believing in my answers.. What are your opinions? And what supports them? Attempt to build a criminal justice organization that fulfills Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. What specific features of your organization could possibly get you from basic needs through self-actualization? You are contacted by a friend who belongs to a local civic club that is planning a Labor Day luncheon to recognize all workers in the community. Knowing of your background and prior study of organizational theory, she asks you to speak at this luncheon. How would you summarize the vast field of organizational theory—from the classic works to the more contemporary approaches?
How do the approaches of acting towards good consequences and acting on duty differ? which approach is better
Explain your understanding of the following maxim of equity with the use of examples or scenarios Equity looks at the intent rather than the form Equity aids the vigilant, not those who slumber on their rights. Equity will not suffer wrong without a remedy.
A key difference between civil rights and civil liberties is that Multiple Choice O O civil liberties may evolve, but civil rights remain static, permanent, and cannot be infringed civil liberties generally apply to groups, while civil rights are protections for individuals civil rights generally apply to groups, while civil liberties are protections for the individual there is no difference; the two terms are used interchangeably
Which one of the following ethical principles states that an individual is free in making his own decisions without being forced? O a. Principle of fairness O b. Principle of beneficence O c. Principle of justice O d. Principle of respect for autonomy
When it comes to ethical decision making in business, what is the most effective way to promote reasoned dialogue and create consensus
The US Supreme Court case that determined that if an employment practice has an adverse impact or unequal effect on minority groups then burden of proof is on the employer to show that the test is necessary was Griswold v. Connecticut Griggs v. Duke Power Company Anderson v. Richards Electricity O Harvie v. Vegas Engineering
You are caught in the middle of a dilemma. You have been subpoenaed to be a witness in a work-related sexual harassment case involving your boss and a coworker. On more than one occasion, you heard your boss make statements to this employee that could be interpreted as sexual advances. Your boss has made it clear that he will make things difficult for you at work if you testify in favor of the employee. You could choose to testify in a manner that would make it appear that your boss was not serious and that the employee was overreacting. However, you truly thought that your boss was not joking with the employee and that he was harassing her. What kind of repercussions could there be if you testify in favor of your coworker? Would you be willing to risk those repercussions?
What are the protected classes under the Fair Housing Act? familial status, color, race, national origin, sex, disability, religion, marital status color, race, national origin, sex, disability, religion familial status, color, race, national origin, sex, disability, religion familial status, color, race, national origin, sex, religion +
How are employees encouraged to speak up if they observe behavior that is inappropriate or harmful to the workplace culture?

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Understanding Business

Management

ISBN:

9781259929434

Author:

William Nickels

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

Management (14th Edition)

Management

ISBN:

9780134527604

Author:

Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter

Publisher:

PEARSON

Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…

Management

ISBN:

9781305947412

Author:

Cliff Ragsdale

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Understanding Business

Management

ISBN:

9781259929434

Author:

William Nickels

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

Management (14th Edition)

Management

ISBN:

9780134527604

Author:

Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter

Publisher:

PEARSON

Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…

Management

ISBN:

9781305947412

Author:

Cliff Ragsdale

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi…

Management

ISBN:

9780135191798

Author:

Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon

Publisher:

PEARSON

Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in…

Management

ISBN:

9780134728391

Author:

Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin

Publisher:

PEARSON

Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)

Management

ISBN:

9780134237473

Author:

Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo

Publisher:

PEARSON

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS

		It is consistent with decisions that seriously harm a small minority to bring about happiness for a large majority.
		It is consistent with decisions that violate human rights.
		It is consistent with decisions that violate important moral principles.
		It is consistent with decisions that bring about the unhappiness of the majority.