When reviewing a research article, where would you expect to find the research (or PICO) question that the authors were trying to answer?

Was the Tuskegee a valid scientific study? Please state at least two reasons for your answer? Can you please help me with this question

Technical vs. scientific question?

1a) Describe the general process of a scientific investigation. 1b) State one difference between science and pseudoscience.

1) Summarize the main point of the study in two or three sentences.  (Make sure you use your own words). 2) Look at the citation at the beginning of the paper. Who is the first author of the paper?  And does this have any significance? 3) In one or two sentences, restate the title of the paper in a way that would be understandable to a member of the general public without a scientific background. And when was the paper published as well as who funded the research?

Please describe the ethical difficulties of international research. How would you reconcile the various ethical visions in an international research project?

How to peer review a research article

What are the different controversies associated with biotechnological research and its resulting products.  Be sure to provide details on exactly why the development is controversial.

how do you make a graph to plot and record data after a a experiment?

How is an experiment different from other scientific test such as observational studies or natural experiments?