Chen et al. (2000) examined the foraging behaviour of northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris) that breed along the west coast of Mexico and the USA. They attached platform satellite transmitter terminals (PTTs) to 22 male seals and recorded, for each seal, the distance (km) to its main feeding area offshore and the amount of time (days) it spent at the feeding area. The results are presented below What two null hypotheses are being tested with the output shown above? What statistical conclusions would you draw about these hypotheses? Complete the regression equation by filling in the blanks (to the nearest 3 decimal places). duration = + * distance What is one biological interpretation of this relationship between duration and distance ? What % of the variation in duration at main feeding area was explained by distance to feeding area? Call:1m (formula duration ~Residuals:Mindistance, data = Dataset)10 Median3QMax-41.259 -5.804 1.950 6.859 30.703Coefficients:Estimate Std. Error t value Pr (>|t|)7.996893 9.651 5.73e-09 ***distance -0.009211 0.002509 -3.671 0.00152 **(Intercept) 77.177505Signif. codes: 0¹*** 0.001 ** 0.01 0.05 0.1¹ 1Residual standard error: 15.14 on 20 degrees of freedomMultiple R-squared: 0.4026, Adjusted R-squared: 0.3727F-statistic: 13.48 on 1 and 20 DF, p-value: 0.001515

What two null hypotheses are being tested with the output shown aboveH0 : b =0H1 : b ≠0What…

Answered: What is one biological interpretation…

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

Chen et al. (2000) examined the foraging behaviour of northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris) that breed along the west coast of Mexico and the USA. They attached platform satellite transmitter terminals (PTTs) to 22 male seals and recorded, for each seal, the distance (km) to its main feeding area offshore and the amount of time (days) it spent at the feeding area. The results are presented below

What two null hypotheses are being tested with the output shown above?
What statistical conclusions would you draw about these hypotheses?
Complete the regression equation by filling in the blanks (to the nearest 3 decimal places).

duration = + * distance

What is one biological interpretation of this relationship between duration and distance ?
What % of the variation in duration at main feeding area was explained by distance to feeding area?